Sensitivity of a Direct Computer-aided Detection System in Full-field Digital Mammography for Detection of Microcalcifications Not Associated with Mass or Architectural Distortion

Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity of a direct computer-aided detection (CAD) system (d-CAD) in full-field digital mammography (FFDM) for the detection of microcalcifications not associated with mass or architectural distortion. Materials and Methods A database search of 1063 consecutive stereotactic core biopsies performed between 2002 and 2005 identified 196 patients with Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 4 and 5 microcalcifications not associated with mass or distortion detected exclusively by bilateral FFDM. A commercially available CAD system (Second Look, version 7.2) was retrospectively applied to the craniocaudal and mediolateral oblique views in these patients (mean age, 59 years; range, 35–84 years). Breast density, location and mammographic size of the lesion, distribution, and tumour histology were recorded and analysed by using χ2, Fisher exact, or McNemar tests, when applicable. Results When using d-CAD, 71 of 74 malignant microcalcification cases (96%) and 101 of 122 benign microcalcifications (83%) were identified. There was a significant difference (P < .05) between CAD sensitivity on the craniocaudal view, 91% (68 of 75), vs CAD sensitivity on the mediolateral oblique view, 80% (60 of 75). The d-CAD sensitivity for dense breast tissue (American College of Radiology [ACR] density 3 and 4) was higher (97%) than d-CAD sensitivity (95%) for nondense tissue (ACR density 1 and 2), but the difference was not statically significant. All 28 malignant calcifications larger than 10 mm were detected by CAD, whereas the sensitivity for lesions small than or equal to 10 mm was 94%. Conclusions D-CAD had a high sensitivity in the depiction of asymptomatic breast cancers, which were seen as microcalcifications on FFDM screening, with a sensitivity of d-CAD on the craniocaudal view being significantly better. All malignant microcalcifications larger than 10 mm were detected by d-CAD.

[1]  Jeffrey W Hoffmeister,et al.  Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection for breast cancer. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[2]  E. Grabbe,et al.  Computer-aided detection in direct digital full-field mammography: initial results , 2002, European Radiology.

[3]  Woo Kyung Moon,et al.  Screening mammography-detected cancers: sensitivity of a computer-aided detection system applied to full-field digital mammograms. , 2007, Radiology.

[4]  Jay A Baker,et al.  Computer-aided detection in screening mammography: variability in cues. , 2004, Radiology.

[5]  Wende Logan-Young,et al.  Evaluation of computer-aided detection systems in the detection of small invasive breast carcinoma. , 2007, Radiology.

[6]  Bin Zheng,et al.  Mammography with computer-aided detection: reproducibility assessment initial experience. , 2003, Radiology.

[7]  J. Im,et al.  Reproducibility of Computer-Aided Detection Marks in Digital Mammography , 2007, Korean journal of radiology.

[8]  W. T. Ho,et al.  Clinical performance of computer-assisted detection (CAD system in detecting carcinoma in breasts of different densities. , 2003, Clinical Radiology.

[9]  W A Kaiser,et al.  Reproducibility--an important factor determining the quality of computer-aided detection (CAD) systems. , 2000, European journal of radiology.

[10]  Joachim Böttcher,et al.  Effect of Breast Density on Computer Aided Detection , 2005, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[11]  Debra M Ikeda,et al.  Computer-aided detection with screening mammography in a university hospital setting. , 2005, Radiology.

[12]  Jeffrey W Hoffmeister,et al.  Detection of breast cancer with full-field digital mammography and computer-aided detection. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[13]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Effect of soft-copy display supported by CAD on mammography screening performance , 2005, European Radiology.

[14]  Martin P DeSimio,et al.  A computer-aided detection system for the evaluation of breast cancer by mammographic appearance and lesion size. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[15]  M. Rebner,et al.  Ductal carcinoma in situ: computer-aided detection in screening mammography. , 2006, Radiology.

[16]  Christina Ilvento,et al.  Improved cancer detection using computer-aided detection with diagnostic and screening mammography: prospective study of 104 cancers. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[17]  Woo Kyung Moon,et al.  Computer-aided detection in digital mammography: comparison of craniocaudal, mediolateral oblique, and mediolateral views. , 2006, Radiology.

[18]  T. Freer,et al.  Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center. , 2001, Radiology.

[19]  L. Tabár,et al.  Potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography. , 2000, Radiology.

[20]  Mary Scott Soo,et al.  Computer-aided detection of amorphous calcifications. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[21]  KathleenR. Brandt,et al.  Screening mammograms: interpretation with computer-aided detection--prospective evaluation. , 2006, Radiology.

[22]  C. D'Orsi,et al.  Influence of computer-aided detection on performance of screening mammography. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  M. J. Yaffe,et al.  Screening Mammography-detected Cancers: Sensitivity of a Computer-aided Detection System Applied to Full-Field Digital Mammograms , 2008 .

[24]  Woo Kyung Moon,et al.  Computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography: sensitivity and reproducibility in serial examinations. , 2008, Radiology.

[25]  Priscilla J Slanetz,et al.  Prospective assessment of computer-aided detection in interpretation of screening mammography. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[26]  D. Ikeda,et al.  Mammographic characteristics of 115 missed cancers later detected with screening mammography and the potential utility of computer-aided detection. , 2001, Radiology.

[27]  Carola Werner,et al.  Impact of Breast Density on Computer-Aided Detection in Full-Field Digital Mammography , 2006, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[28]  Thomas Boehm,et al.  Influence of breast lesion size and histologic findings on tumor detection rate of a computer-aided detection system. , 2003, Radiology.

[29]  K. O'Shaughnessy,et al.  Computer-aided detection in diagnostic mammography: detection of clinically unsuspected cancers. , 2004, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.