Effects of Speech Output on Maintenance of Requesting and Frequency of Vocalizations in Three Children with Developmental Disabilities

We evaluated the role of digitized speech output on the maintenance of requesting and frequency of vocalizations in three children with developmental disabilities. The children were taught to request access to preferred objects using an augmentative communication speech-generating device (SGD). Following acquisition, rates of requesting and vocalizations were compared across two conditions (speech output on versus speech output off) that were alternated on a session-by-session basis. There were no major or consistent differences across the two conditions for the three children, suggesting that access to preferred objects was the critical variable maintaining use of the SGDs. The results also suggest that feedback in the form of digitized speech from the SGD did not inhibit vocalizations. One child began to speak single words during the latter part of the study, suggesting that in some cases AAC intervention involving SGDs may facilitate speech.

[1]  J. Michael.  Verbal behavior. , 1984, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[2]  R. Horner,et al.  Acquisition of Manual Sign Use: Collateral Reduction of Maladaptive Behavior, and Factors Limiting Generalization. , 1985 .

[3]  Pat Mirenda,et al.  A computer-supported communication approach for a child with severe communication, visual, and cognitive impairments: A case study , 1988 .

[4]  R. Sevcik,et al.  Establishment of symbolic communication in persons with severe retardation. , 1988, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[5]  David A. Rotholz,et al.  Functionality of Two Modes of Communication in the Community by Students with Developmental Disabilities: A Comparison of Signing and Communication Books , 1989 .

[6]  Jeff Sigafoos,et al.  Initial comparison of the efficiency of a variety of AAC systems for ordering meals in fast food restaurants , 1991 .

[7]  Jennifer Angelo,et al.  Implementing Augmentative and Alternative Communication: Strategies for Learners With Severe Disabilities , 1992 .

[8]  G. Soto.  Teaching Specific Requests: A Comparative Analysis on Skill Acquisition and Preference Using Two Augmentative and Alternative Communication Aids. , 1993 .

[9]  David R. Beukelman,et al.  Augmentative and Alternative Communication: Management of Severe Communication Disorders in Children and Adults , 1995 .

[10]  J. Sigafoos,et al.  Parent and Teacher Assessment of Receptive and Expressive Language in Preschool Children with Developmental Disabilities. , 1995 .

[11]  E. Drasgow,et al.  Using Behavioral Indication and Functional Communication Training to Establish an Initial Sign Repertoire with a Young Child with Severe Disabilities , 1996 .

[12]  M M Schepis,et al.  Acquisition and Functional Use of Voice Output Communication by Persons with Profound Multiple Disabilities , 1996, Behavior modification.

[13]  R. Sevcik,et al.  Breaking the speech barrier : language development through augmented means , 1996 .

[14]  P. Duker,et al.  Establishing Gestural Yes-No Responding with Individuals with Profound Mental Retardation. , 1997 .

[15]  J. Sigafoos.  Assessing Conditional Use of Graphic Mode Requesting in a Young Boy with Autism , 1998 .

[16]  A. Bondy,et al.  The Picture Exchange Communication System , 2001, Behavior modification.

[17]  F. Meire,et al.  Mental retardation in amaurosis congenita of Leber. , 1998, Neuropediatrics.

[18]  D. Reid,et al.  Increasing communicative interactions of young children with autism using a voice output communication aid and naturalistic teaching. , 1998, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[19]  J. Sigafoos,et al.  Teaching communication to learners with severe disabilities: Motivation, response competition, and generalisation , 1999 .

[20]  Jeff Sigafoos,et al.  Conditional Use of Aided and Unaided AAC , 2001 .

[21]  Ralf W. Schlosser,et al.  Is There a Role for Speech Output in Interventions for Persons with Autism? , 2001 .

[22]  J. Sigafoos,et al.  Strengthening communicative behaviors for gaining access to desired items and activities , 2002 .

[23]  Ralf W. Schlosser,et al.  Selecting graphic symbols for an initial request lexicon: integrative review , 2002 .

[24]  Rajinder Koul,et al.  Synthetic Speech Perception in Individuals With and Without Disabilities , 2003, Augmentative and alternative communication.

[25]  DOREEN BLISCHAK,et al.  Use of Speech-Generating Devices: In Support of Natural Speech , 2003, Augmentative and alternative communication.

[26]  Ralf W. Schlosser,et al.  The Efficacy of Augmentative and Alternative Communication: Toward Evidence-Based Practice , 2003 .

[27]  R. Schlosser,et al.  Roles of Speech Output in Augmentative and Alternative Communication: Narrative Review , 2003, Augmentative and alternative communication.

[28]  Pat Mirenda,et al.  Toward Functional Augmentative and Alternative Communication for Students With Autism: Manual Signs, Graphic Symbols, and Voice Output Communication Aids. , 2003, Language, speech, and hearing services in schools.