Genome-Wide Kinetics of Nucleosome Turnover Determined by Metabolic Labeling of Histones

Everything Changes Nucleosomes package DNA, and their assembly and disassembly regulate access to the genome. The ability to follow these changes is limited to steady-state methods in higher eukaryotes, although direct kinetic analyses are available in yeast. To address this deficiency, Deal et al. (p. 1161) developed a general method for following the genome-wide dynamics of nucleosome assembly and disassembly. High levels of nucleosome turnover were observed across gene bodies and at the sites of epigenetic regulatory elements in fruit fly tissue culture cells. Nucleosomes were replaced multiple times during each 20-hour cell cycle, suggesting that histone modifications themselves are unlikely to transmit epigenetic information. Furthermore, analysis of replication origins indicates that they are determined by chromatin dynamics and not by sequence features. Differences between active and silent chromatin states are critical for maintaining the epigenome. Nucleosome disruption and replacement are crucial activities that maintain epigenomes, but these highly dynamic processes have been difficult to study. Here, we describe a direct method for measuring nucleosome turnover dynamics genome-wide. We found that nucleosome turnover is most rapid over active gene bodies, epigenetic regulatory elements, and replication origins in Drosophila cells. Nucleosomes turn over faster at sites for trithorax-group than polycomb-group protein binding, suggesting that nucleosome turnover differences underlie their opposing activities and challenging models for epigenetic inheritance that rely on stability of histone marks. Our results establish a general strategy for studying nucleosome dynamics and uncover nucleosome turnover differences across the genome that are likely to have functional importance for epigenome maintenance, gene regulation, and control of DNA replication.

[1]  K. Yamasu,et al.  Conservative segregation of tetrameric units of H3 and H4 histones during nucleosome replication. , 1990, Journal of biochemistry.

[2]  David M. Gilbert,et al.  In search of the holy replicator , 2004, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[3]  A. Pombo,et al.  Variant histone H3.3 marks promoters of transcriptionally active genes during mammalian cell division , 2005, EMBO reports.

[4]  D. Schübeler,et al.  Variant histone H3.3 is deposited at sites of nucleosomal displacement throughout transcribed genes while active histone modifications show a promoter-proximal bias. , 2005, Genes & development.

[5]  Jennifer A. Prescher,et al.  Chemistry in living systems , 2005, Nature chemical biology.

[6]  S. Henikoff,et al.  Genome-scale profiling of histone H3.3 replacement patterns , 2005, Nature Genetics.

[7]  Richard Bourgon,et al.  Genome-wide analysis of Polycomb targets in Drosophila melanogaster , 2006, Nature Genetics.

[8]  Daniela C Dieterich,et al.  Selective identification of newly synthesized proteins in mammalian cells using bioorthogonal noncanonical amino acid tagging (BONCAT). , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  Nir Friedman,et al.  Dynamics of Replication-Independent Histone Turnover in Budding Yeast , 2007, Science.

[10]  T. Shimojima,et al.  Drosophila GAGA factor directs histone H3.3 replacement that prevents the heterochromatin spreading. , 2007, Genes & development.

[11]  Adil Jamai,et al.  Continuous histone H2B and transcription-dependent histone H3 exchange in yeast cells outside of replication. , 2007, Molecular cell.

[12]  F. Robert,et al.  Genome-wide replication-independent histone H3 exchange occurs predominantly at promoters and implicates H3 K56 acetylation and Asf1. , 2007, Molecular cell.

[13]  S. Henikoff,et al.  Histone Replacement Marks the Boundaries of cis-Regulatory Domains , 2007, Science.

[14]  Juri Rappsilber,et al.  A model for transmission of the H3K27me3 epigenetic mark , 2008, Nature Cell Biology.

[15]  Steven Henikoff,et al.  Nucleosome destabilization in the epigenetic regulation of gene expression , 2008, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[16]  J. Lis,et al.  Rapid, Transcription-Independent Loss of Nucleosomes over a Large Chromatin Domain at Hsp70 Loci , 2008, Cell.

[17]  S. Henikoff,et al.  Genome-wide profiling of salt fractions maps physical properties of chromatin. , 2009, Genome research.

[18]  B. van Steensel,et al.  UvA-DARE ( Digital Academic Repository ) Reading the maps : Organization and function of chromatin types in Drosophila Braunschweig , 2010 .

[19]  B. McConkey,et al.  The origin recognition complex protein family , 2009, Genome Biology.

[20]  Kairong Cui,et al.  H3.3/H2A.Z double variant-containing nucleosomes mark ‘nucleosome-free regions’ of active promoters and other regulatory regions in the human genome , 2009, Nature Genetics.

[21]  J. Lamarque,et al.  Global Biodiversity: Indicators of Recent Declines , 2010, Science.

[22]  Christopher D. Brown,et al.  A Comprehensive Map of Insulator Elements for the Drosophila Genome , 2010, PLoS genetics.

[23]  S. Henikoff,et al.  A native chromatin purification system for epigenomic profiling in Caenorhabditis elegans , 2009, Nucleic acids research.

[24]  R. Gordân,et al.  Drosophila ORC localizes to open chromatin and marks sites of cohesin complex loading. , 2010, Genome research.