Hardware Complexity Reduction in Universal Filtered Multicarrier Transmitter Implementation

The inclusion of machine-type communication in the 5G technology has motivated the research community to explore new derivative waveforms of orthogonal frequency division multiplexing. Filter bank multicarrier, universal filtered multicarrier (UFMC), and generalized frequency division multiplexing techniques are under evaluation with respect to their suitability to 5G requirements. In addition to acceptable spectral performance, investigation on computational complexity reduction while addressing flexibility can help in the selection of suitable waveform among multiple options available for 5G. In this regard, based on analysis of computation involved in UFMC waveform construction, few reduced complexity solution for UFMC transmitter implementations are recently proposed. However, hardware-implementation-related issues have not been discussed in detail. In this paper, we have proposed reduced complexity hardware solutions for all three constituent blocks, i.e., inverse discrete Fourier transform (IDFT), finite impulse response (FIR) filter, and spectrum shifting blocks of a UFMC transmitter. For IDFT part, a reduced complexity IFFT solution using Radix-2 decimation in a time technique is presented, where more than 42% computations can be avoided. It is also shown that how five times less number of multipliers can be used in an FIR filter to simplify filter architecture. Finally, a highly efficient method is presented to compute spectrum shifting coefficients through small sized lookup table.

[1]  Frank Schaich,et al.  Universal-filtered multi-carrier technique for wireless systems beyond LTE , 2013, 2013 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps).

[2]  Richard G. Lyons,et al.  Understanding Digital Signal Processing (2nd Edition) , 2004 .

[3]  Frank Schaich,et al.  A Reduced Complexity Transmitter for UF-OFDM , 2015, 2015 IEEE 81st Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring).

[4]  Hugo M. Tullberg,et al.  METIS research and standardization: A path towards a 5G system , 2014, 2014 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps).

[5]  Behrouz Farhang-Boroujeny,et al.  OFDM Versus Filter Bank Multicarrier , 2011, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[6]  Raymond Knopp,et al.  Universal filtered multicarrier for machine type communications in 5G , 2016 .

[7]  Frank Schaich,et al.  5GNOW: non-orthogonal, asynchronous waveforms for future mobile applications , 2014, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[8]  Frank Schaich,et al.  Waveform Contenders for 5G - Suitability for Short Packet and Low Latency Transmissions , 2014, 2014 IEEE 79th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring).

[9]  Rahim Tafazolli,et al.  Subband Filtered Multi-Carrier Systems for Multi-Service Wireless Communications , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[10]  Xavier Mestre,et al.  The 5G candidate waveform race: a comparison of complexity and performance , 2017, EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking.

[11]  Gerhard Fettweis,et al.  GFDM - Generalized Frequency Division Multiplexing , 2009, VTC Spring 2009 - IEEE 69th Vehicular Technology Conference.

[12]  Thorsten Wild,et al.  Waveform contenders for 5G — OFDM vs. FBMC vs. UFMC , 2014, 2014 6th International Symposium on Communications, Control and Signal Processing (ISCCSP).