A Visual Tool for the Analysis of Algorithms for Tomographic Fiber Reconstruction in Materials Science

We present visual analysis methods for the evaluation of tomographic fiber reconstruction algorithms by means of analysis, visual debugging and comparison of reconstructed fibers in materials science. The methods are integrated in a tool (FIAKER) that supports the entire workflow. It enables the analysis of various fiber reconstruction algorithms, of differently parameterized fiber reconstruction algorithms and of individual steps in iterative fiber reconstruction algorithms. Insight into the performance of fiber reconstruction algorithms is obtained by a list‐based ranking interface. A 3D view offers interactive visualization techniques to gain deeper insight, e.g., into the aggregated quality of the examined fiber reconstruction algorithms and parameterizations. The tool was designed in close collaboration with researchers who work with fiber‐reinforced polymers on a daily basis and develop algorithms for tomographic reconstruction and characterization of such materials. We evaluate the tool using synthetic datasets as well as tomograms of real materials. Five case studies certify the usefulness of the tool, showing that it significantly accelerates the analysis and provides valuable insights that make it possible to improve the fiber reconstruction algorithms. The main contribution of the paper is the well‐considered combination of methods and their seamless integration into a visual tool that supports the entire workflow. Further findings result from the analysis of (dis‐)similarity measures for fibers as well as from the discussion of design decisions. It is also shown that the generality of the analytical methods allows a wider range of applications, such as the application in pore space analysis.

[1]  Johann Kastner,et al.  Consideration of Accuracy of Quantitative X-Ray CT Analyses for Short-Glass-Fibre-Reinforced Polymers , 2015 .

[2]  Torsten Möller,et al.  Hypersliceplorer: Interactive visualization of shapes in multiple dimensions , 2018, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[3]  Lei Zheng,et al.  Fully Convolutional Deep Network Architectures for Automatic Short Glass Fiber Semantic Segmentation from CT scans , 2019, ArXiv.

[4]  Stefan Bruckner,et al.  Visual Parameter Space Analysis: A Conceptual Framework , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[5]  Marc Streit,et al.  WeightLifter: Visual Weight Space Exploration for Multi-Criteria Decision Making , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[6]  Eduard Gröller,et al.  FiberScout: An Interactive Tool for Exploring and Analyzing Fiber Reinforced Polymers , 2014, 2014 IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium.

[7]  Christoph Heinzl,et al.  open_iA: A tool for processing and visual analysis of industrial computed tomography datasets , 2019, J. Open Source Softw..

[8]  Jan Sijbers,et al.  Parametric Reconstruction of Glass Fiber-reinforced Polymer Composites from X-ray Projection Data—A Simulation Study , 2018, Journal of nondestructive evaluation.

[9]  Eduard Gröller,et al.  PorosityAnalyzer: Visual analysis and evaluation of segmentation pipelines to determine the porosity in fiber-reinforced polymers , 2016, 2016 IEEE Conference on Visual Analytics Science and Technology (VAST).

[10]  Christoph Heinzl,et al.  GEMSe: Visualization‐Guided Exploration of Multi‐channel Segmentation Algorithms , 2016, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[11]  Hanspeter Pfister,et al.  LineUp: Visual Analysis of Multi-Attribute Rankings , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[12]  Carl-Fredrik Westin,et al.  Automatic Tractography Segmentation Using a High-Dimensional White Matter Atlas , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[13]  Michael Wimmer,et al.  YMCA — Your mesh comparison application , 2014, 2014 IEEE Conference on Visual Analytics Science and Technology (VAST).

[14]  F. Natterer X-ray Tomography , 2008 .

[15]  Bay Vo,et al.  Similarity Measure for Fiber Clustering: A Constant Time Complexity Algorithm , 2015, 2015 Seventh International Conference on Knowledge and Systems Engineering (KSE).

[16]  Markus Hadwiger,et al.  A Visual Approach to Efficient Analysis and Quantification of Ductile Iron and Reinforced Sprayed Concrete , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[17]  Tovi Grossman,et al.  Dream Lens: Exploration and Visualization of Large-Scale Generative Design Datasets , 2018, CHI.

[18]  Rephael Wenger,et al.  Interactive Exploration and Visualization Using MetaTracts extracted from Carbon Fiber Reinforced Composites , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[19]  Thomas Ertl,et al.  Visualization of Bubble Formation in Porous Media , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[20]  Christoph Heinzl,et al.  Visual analysis of void and reinforcement characteristics in X-ray computed tomography dataset series of fiber-reinforced polymers , 2018, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering.

[21]  Thomas Schultz,et al.  Diffusion MRI visualization , 2019, NMR in biomedicine.

[22]  Tamara Munzner,et al.  Design Study Methodology: Reflections from the Trenches and the Stacks , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[23]  Johann Kastner,et al.  Evaluation of Computed Tomography Data from Fibre Reinforced Polymers to Determine Fibre Length Distribution , 2011 .

[24]  Jean-Francois Mangin,et al.  Fast Automatic Segmentation of White Matter Streamlines Based on a Multi-Subject Bundle Atlas , 2016, Neuroinformatics.

[25]  Jan Sijbers,et al.  Fast and flexible X-ray tomography using the ASTRA toolbox. , 2016, Optics express.