Hierarchical Procrustes Matching for Shape Retrieval

We introduce Hierarchical Procrustes Matching (HPM), a segment-based shape matching algorithm which avoids problems associated with purely global or local methods and performs well on benchmark shape retrieval tests. The simplicity of the shape representation leads to a powerful matching algorithm which incorporates intuitive ideas about the perceptual nature of shape while being computationally efficient. This includes the ability to match similar parts even when they occur at different scales or positions. While comparison of multiscale shape representations is typically based on specific features, HPM avoids the need to extract such features. The hierarchical structure of the algorithm captures the appealing notion that matching should proceed in a global to local direction.

[1]  Fred L. Bookstein,et al.  Landmark methods for forms without landmarks: morphometrics of group differences in outline shape , 1997, Medical Image Anal..

[2]  K. Mardia,et al.  Statistical Shape Analysis , 1998 .

[3]  Alberto Del Bimbo,et al.  Shape indexing by multi-scale representation , 1999, Image Vis. Comput..

[4]  Ulrich Eckhardt,et al.  Shape descriptors for non-rigid shapes with a single closed contour , 2000, Proceedings IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. CVPR 2000 (Cat. No.PR00662).

[5]  Euripides G. M. Petrakis,et al.  Shape retrieval based on dynamic programming , 2000, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[6]  Luciano da Fontoura Costa,et al.  Shape Analysis and Classification: Theory and Practice , 2000 .

[7]  Serge J. Belongie,et al.  Matching with shape contexts , 2000, 2000 Proceedings Workshop on Content-based Access of Image and Video Libraries.

[8]  Longin Jan Latecki,et al.  Application of planar shape comparison to object retrieval in image databases , 2002, Pattern Recognit..

[9]  Nicolai Petkov,et al.  Distance sets for shape filters and shape recognition , 2003, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[10]  Miroslaw Bober,et al.  Curvature Scale Space Representation: Theory, Applications, and MPEG-7 Standardization , 2011, Computational Imaging and Vision.

[11]  Philip N. Klein,et al.  On Aligning Curves , 2003, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[12]  X. Zhang,et al.  Object representation and recognition in shape spaces , 2003, Pattern Recognit..

[13]  Noel E. O'Connor,et al.  A multiscale representation method for nonrigid shapes with a single closed contour , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology.

[14]  Boaz J. Super Learning Chance Probability Functions for Shape Retrieval or Classification , 2004, 2004 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshop.

[15]  Zhuowen Tu,et al.  Shape Matching and Recognition - Using Generative Models and Informative Features , 2004, ECCV.

[16]  Pepe Siy,et al.  Robust shape similarity retrieval based on contour segmentation polygonal multiresolution and elastic matching , 2005, Pattern Recognit..

[17]  Haibin Ling,et al.  Using the inner-distance for classification of articulated shapes , 2005, 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05).

[18]  Sethu Vijayakumar,et al.  2D Shape Classification and Retrieval , 2005, IJCAI.

[19]  Michael H. F. Wilkinson,et al.  Shape representation and recognition through morphological curvature scale spaces , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.