The objective of this article is to report on the effectiveness of Rollover Protective Structures (ROPS) in preventing continuous overturns of compactors/rollers. This study is a case-based analysis of government investigation reports of injury-related overturns of compactors/rollers. The overturns were predominately on construction sites including road and embankment construction in the USA. Other sites included driveway and roadway maintenance or repair and transporting of compactors/rollers either by driving or when loading on or unloading from trailers. The principle intervention observed in controlling a continuous overturn (a roll beyond 90° relative to the impact surface) was the presence of a ROPS on a compactor/roller that serves as an anti-roll bar. The main outcome measures are cases of compactor/roller overturns that are restricted to a 90° roll or are continuous (exceed a 90° roll.) All cases of an overturn in which a ROPS was present resulted in no continuous overturn, and the cases involved with no ROPS averaged an overturn of 301°, showing a propensity for a continuous overturn. This case-based analysis identified a ROPS on compactors/rollers as an effective control for reducing the risk of an overturn to 90° relative to the impact plane.
[1]
M L Myers.
Prevention effectiveness of rollover protective structures--Part I: Strategy evolution.
,
2000,
Journal of agricultural safety and health.
[2]
Safety Panel,et al.
1 – General safety requirements
,
1991
.
[3]
H. Kendler.
Let's look at the record.
,
1986
.
[4]
L. H. Lamouria,et al.
Design Criteria for a Driver-Safe Tractor Frame
,
1964
.
[5]
Xingmei Wang,et al.
The influence of deck size on the continuous roll behavior of front-drive mowers
,
2006
.
[6]
Melvin J. Dubnick.
Army Corps of Engineers
,
1998
.
[7]
M L Myers.
Tractor risk abatement and control as a coherent strategy.
,
2002,
Journal of agricultural safety and health.