Perceptual detectability of ocular accommodation microfluctuations.

When the eye fixates a stationary stimulus, the power of the lens is known to change rapidly and continuously. Although the basic characteristics of this fluctuating activity are known and the influencing factors have been identified, their exact role in the control of accommodation is uncertain. It is thought that, for the fluctuations to be useful, a detectable change in the retinal image is necessary, yet an accommodation response can be provoked by a stimulus change of only 0.1 D, well within the ocular depth of focus as conventionally measured. In this study we examine whether the fluctuations of accommodation are able to provide perceptual sign information or whether the presence of a sensorimotor mechanism utilizing subthreshold blur is required. Normal accommodation fluctuations for steady-state viewing were recorded using an infrared optometer and subsequently were used to drive a Badal stimulus optometer. The perceptual threshold of the fluctuation signal for an eye under cycloplegia was then determined. The threshold for the detection of the fluctuations at optimal focus was not significantly different from the root-mean-square value of the actual response. Hence a portion of the fluctuations more than spans the dead space (depth of focus) and is therefore capable of providing information to control accommodation without the need for a subthreshold mechanism.

[1]  P. A. Ward,et al.  Effect of pupil size on steady state accommodation , 1985, Vision Research.

[2]  W. N. Charman,et al.  Chapter 1 The retinal image in the human eye , 1983 .

[3]  Kazuhiko Ukai,et al.  A QUASI‐STATIC STUDY OF ACCOMMODATION IN AMBLYOPIA* , 1986, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[4]  J R Pugh,et al.  POWER SPECTRUM ANALYSIS IN THE STUDY OF OCULAR MECHANISMS , 1987, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[5]  William M. Ludlam,et al.  ACCOMMODATIVE RESPONSES TO SMALL CHANGES IN DIOPTRIC STIMULUS* , 1968, American journal of optometry and archives of American Academy of Optometry.

[6]  M. Alpern,et al.  Variability of accommodation during steady fixation at various levels of illuminance. , 1958, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[7]  W. N. Charman,et al.  Visual sensitivity to temporal change in focus and its relevance to the accommodation response , 1988, Vision Research.

[8]  K N OGLE,et al.  Depth of focus of the human eye. , 1959, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[9]  F. Campbell,et al.  Correlation of accommodation between the two eyes. , 1960, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[10]  J. C. Kotulak,et al.  Temporal variations in accommodation during steady-state conditions. , 1986, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[11]  G. Westheimer,et al.  Fluctuations of accommodation under steady viewing conditions , 1959, The Journal of physiology.

[12]  Jay M. Enoch,et al.  On voluntary ocular accommodation , 1975 .

[13]  P. Denieul,et al.  Effects of stimulus vergence on mean accommodation response, microfluctuations of accommodation and optical quality of the human eye , 1982, Vision Research.

[14]  J. C. Kotulak,et al.  The Accommodative Response to Subthreshold Blur and to Perceptual Fading during the Troxler Phenomenon , 1986, Perception.

[15]  W N Charman,et al.  Accommodation as a Function of Object Form , 1978, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.