Environmental sustainability comparison of a hypothetical pneumatic waste collection system and a door-to-door system.

Waste collection is one of the life cycle phases that influence the environmental sustainability of waste management. Pneumatic waste collection systems represent a new way of arranging waste collection in densely populated urban areas. However, limited information is available on the environmental impacts of this system. In this study, we compare the environmental sustainability of conventional door-to-door waste collection with its hypothetical pneumatic alternative. Furthermore, we analyse whether the size of the hypothetical pneumatic system, or the number of waste fractions included, have an impact on the results. Environmental loads are calculated for a hypothetical pneumatic waste collection system modelled on an existing dense urban area in Helsinki, Finland, and the results are compared to those of the prevailing, container-based, door-to-door waste collection system. The evaluation method used is the life-cycle inventory (LCI). In this study, we report the atmospheric emissions of greenhouse gases (GHG), SO(2) and NO(x). The results indicate that replacing the prevailing system with stationary pneumatic waste collection in an existing urban infrastructure would increase total air emissions. Locally, in the waste collection area, emissions would nonetheless diminish, as collection traffic decreases. While the electricity consumption of the hypothetical pneumatic system and the origin of electricity have a significant bearing on the results, emissions due to manufacturing the system's components prove decisive.

[1]  Anna Björklund,et al.  Evaluating a municipal waste management plan using orware , 1999 .

[2]  Sampo Soimakallio,et al.  CO2 emissions attributed to annual average electricity consumption in OECD (the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) countries , 2012 .

[3]  Stefan Salhofer,et al.  The ecological relevance of transport in waste disposal systems in Western Europe. , 2007, Waste management.

[4]  Anna Björklund,et al.  Municipal solid waste management from a systems perspective , 2005 .

[5]  T. H. Christensen,et al.  Collection, transfer and transport of waste: accounting of greenhouse gases and global warming contribution , 2009, Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA.

[6]  Hans-Jürgen Dr. Klüppel,et al.  The Revision of ISO Standards 14040-3 - ISO 14040: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework - ISO 14044: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines , 2005 .

[7]  J H Tanskanen,et al.  Comparison of methods used in the collection of source-separated household waste , 2001, Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA.

[8]  Thomas H Christensen,et al.  Diesel consumption in waste collection and transport and its environmental significance , 2009, Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA.

[9]  Markku Ollikainen,et al.  Jätteiden kierrätyksen ja polton käsittelyketjujen ympäristökuormitus ja kustannukset. Inventaarioraportti , 2008 .

[10]  Paolo S Calabrò,et al.  Greenhouse gases emission from municipal waste management: The role of separate collection. , 2009, Waste management.

[11]  X. Gabarrell,et al.  LCA of selective waste collection systems in dense urban areas. , 2009, Waste management.

[12]  Giovanni Dotelli,et al.  Accounting for transportation impacts in the environmental assessment of waste management plans , 2009 .

[13]  T H Christensen,et al.  Waste collection systems for recyclables: an environmental and economic assessment for the municipality of Aarhus (Denmark). , 2010, Waste management.

[14]  Yasuhiko Wada,et al.  Evaluating household waste treatment systems with specific examination of collection and transportation processes , 2009 .

[15]  Simone Manfredi,et al.  Environmental assessment of different management options for individual waste fractions by means of life-cycle assessment modelling , 2011 .

[16]  Markku Ollikainen,et al.  Pneumatic vs. door-to-door waste collection systems in existing urban areas: a comparison of economic performance. , 2012, Waste management.

[17]  N. H. Ravindranath,et al.  2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories , 2006 .