Gold Standard Myths: Observations on the Experimental Turn in Quantitative Criminology

[1]  P. Sharkey,et al.  Neighborhood selection and the social reproduction of concentrated racial inequality , 2008, Demography.

[2]  R. Moffitt,et al.  Remarks on the analysis of causal relationships in population research , 2005, Demography.

[3]  M. Gangl Causal Inference in Sociological Research , 2010 .

[4]  David Weisburd,et al.  Justifying the use of non-experimental methods and disqualifying the use of randomized controlled trials: challenging folklore in evaluation research in crime and justice , 2010 .

[5]  R. Berk,et al.  When second best is good enough: a comparison between a true experiment and a regression discontinuity quasi-experiment , 2010 .

[6]  Michael Keane,et al.  A Structural Perspective on the Experimentalist School , 2010 .

[7]  Joshua D. Angrist,et al.  The Credibility Revolution in Empirical Economics: How Better Research Design is Taking the Con Out of Econometrics , 2010, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[8]  P. Carr The problem with experimental criminology: A response to Sherman’s ‘Evidence and Liberty’ , 2010 .

[9]  Todd R. Clear,et al.  POLICY AND EVIDENCE: THE CHALLENGE TO THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CRIMINOLOGY: 2009 PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS TO THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CRIMINOLOGY* , 2010 .

[10]  M. Hough Gold standard or fool’s gold? The pursuit of certainty in experimental criminology , 2010 .

[11]  C. Manski Policy choice with partial knowledge of policy effectiveness , 2011 .

[12]  D. Green,et al.  Using Random Judge Assignments to Estimate the Effects of Incarceration and Probation on Recidivism Among Drug Offenders , 2009 .

[13]  P. Nieuwbeerta,et al.  Assessing the Impact of First-Time Imprisonment on Offenders’ Subsequent Criminal Career Development: A Matched Samples Comparison , 2009 .

[14]  Nick Tilley,et al.  Sherman vs Sherman , 2009 .

[15]  Tim Hope The illusion of control , 2009 .

[16]  L. Sherman Evidence and liberty , 2009 .

[17]  A. Deaton Instruments of Development: Randomization in the Tropics, and the Search for the Elusive Keys to Economic Development , 2009 .

[18]  Herbert L. Smith Causation and Its Discontents , 2009 .

[19]  A. Prskawetz,et al.  Causal Analysis in Population Studies , 2009 .

[20]  Vivian C. Wong,et al.  Three conditions under which experiments and observational studies produce comparable causal estimates: New findings from within‐study comparisons , 2008 .

[21]  S. Raudenbush,et al.  Causal Inference for Time-Varying Instructional Treatments , 2008 .

[22]  D. Massey,et al.  Neighborhood Effects on Economic Self‐Sufficiency: A Reconsideration of the Moving to Opportunity Experiment1 , 2008, American Journal of Sociology.

[23]  Robert J. Sampson,et al.  Moving to Inequality: Neighborhood Effects and Experiments Meet Social Structure1 , 2008, American Journal of Sociology.

[24]  Lawrence F. Katz,et al.  What Can We Learn about Neighborhood Effects from the Moving to Opportunity Experiment?1 , 2008, American Journal of Sociology.

[25]  M. Hudgens,et al.  Toward Causal Inference With Interference , 2008, Journal of the American Statistical Association.

[26]  S. Raudenbush Advancing Educational Policy by Advancing Research on Instruction , 2008 .

[27]  Mary Carlson,et al.  Young citizens as health agents: use of drama in promoting community efficacy for HIV/AIDS. , 2008, American journal of public health.

[28]  C. R. Tittle,et al.  Product Review: The Explanation of Crime: Context, Mechanisms and Development , 2007 .

[29]  Christopher Winship,et al.  Counterfactuals and Causal Inference: Methods and Principles for Social Research , 2007 .

[30]  P. Rosenbaum Interference Between Units in Randomized Experiments , 2007 .

[31]  Nancy Cartwright,et al.  Are RCTs the Gold Standard? , 2007 .

[32]  A. Petrosino,et al.  The Academy of Experimental Criminology: Advancing Randomized Trials in Crime and Justice , 2007 .

[33]  E. Stuart,et al.  Misunderstandings among Experimentalists and Observationalists about Causal Inference , 2007 .

[34]  Michael E. Sobel,et al.  What Do Randomized Studies of Housing Mobility Demonstrate? , 2006 .

[35]  John E. Eck,et al.  DOES CRIME JUST MOVE AROUND THE CORNER? A CONTROLLED STUDY OF SPATIAL DISPLACEMENT AND DIFFUSION OF CRIME CONTROL BENEFITS* , 2006 .

[36]  C. Wimer,et al.  DOES MARRIAGE REDUCE CRIME? A COUNTERFACTUAL APPROACH TO WITHIN‐INDIVIDUAL CAUSAL EFFECTS* , 2006 .

[37]  Amelia M. Haviland,et al.  Causal inferences with group based trajectory models , 2005 .

[38]  Richard A. Berk,et al.  Randomized experiments as the bronze standard , 2005 .

[39]  James J. Heckman,et al.  1. The Scientific Model of Causality , 2005 .

[40]  J. Pearl Statistics and causal inference: A review , 2003 .

[41]  Stanley Lieberson,et al.  B ARKING U P THE W RONG B RANCH : Scientific Alternatives to the Current Model of Sociological Science , 2002 .

[42]  R. Winett,et al.  Outcomes of a randomized community-level HIV prevention intervention for women living in 18 low-income housing developments. , 2000, American journal of public health.

[43]  Joshua D. Angrist,et al.  Identification of Causal Effects Using Instrumental Variables , 1993 .

[44]  Charles F. Manski,et al.  Evaluating Welfare and Training Programs. , 1994 .

[45]  James J. Heckman,et al.  Randomization and Social Policy Evaluation , 1991 .

[46]  Stanley Lieberson,et al.  Making It Count: The Improvement of Social Research and Theory. , 1987 .

[47]  R. Lalonde Evaluating the Econometric Evaluations of Training Programs with Experimental Data , 1984 .