The disconnection syndrome. Basic findings reaffirmed.

Recent challenges to the traditional view of the disconnection syndrome have been based primarily on evidence of information shared between the hemispheres in commissurotomy patients L.B. and N.G. of the West Coast series. In order to evaluate the generality of these claims, patients J.W., V.P. and D.R. were tested using a series of experiments which replicated and extended some of the experiments carried out in the West Coast series. Using comparisons of numerical identity and value as the model tasks, we found no indication that the separated hemispheres of J.W. or D.R. could share information on any of the tasks they performed. V.P., who has spared callosal fibres and has shown highly specific transfer in previous investigations, performed above chance (60%) in one out of three between field conditions. Together the data fail to support the claims that split-brain patients show evidence of unified cognitive functioning particularly for more abstract, nonperceptual tasks. The data are consistent with the traditional view of the corpus callosum as the primary interhemispheric pathway by which sensory and high-level cognitive integration is achieved.

[1]  Explicit dialogue between left and right half-systems of split brains , 1982, Nature.

[2]  M. Gazzaniga Interhemispheric communication of visual learning , 1966 .

[3]  Michael S. Gazzaniga,et al.  Human callosal function , 1989, Neurology.

[4]  Michael S. Gazzaniga,et al.  MRI assessment of human callosal surgery with neuropsychological correlates , 1985, Neurology.

[5]  Y Toyokura,et al.  [Disconnection syndrome]. , 1978, Nihon rinsho. Japanese journal of clinical medicine.

[6]  William Hirst,et al.  Profiles of right hemisphere language and speech following brain bisection , 1984, Brain and Language.

[7]  R W Sperry,et al.  Perceptual unity of the ambient visual field in human commissurotomy patients. , 1973, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[8]  Joseph E LeDoux,et al.  Plasticity in speech organization following commissurotomy. , 1979, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[9]  M. Gazzaniga,et al.  Speech without conscious awareness , 1987, Neurology.

[10]  R. Sperry,et al.  Some functional effects of sectioning the cerebral commissures in man* , 1962, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  R. Sperry,et al.  Interhemispheric Communication After Section of the Forebrain Commissures , 1985, Cortex.

[12]  M. Gazzaniga,et al.  Reading with a limited lexicon in the right hemisphere of a callosotomy patient , 1992, Neuropsychologia.

[13]  A. Cronin-Golomb,et al.  Subcortical Transfer of Cognitive Information in Subjects With Complete Forebrain Commissurotomy , 1986, Cortex.

[14]  J Sergent,et al.  A new look at the human split brain. , 1987, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[15]  David W. Roberts,et al.  Neurologic Perspectives on Right Hemisphere Language Following Surgical Section of the Corpus Callosum , 1984 .

[16]  N. Geschwind Disconnexion syndromes in animals and man. I. , 1965, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[17]  R. Sperry,et al.  Interhemispheric interaction during simultaneous bilateral presentation of letters or digits in commissurotomized patients. , 1973, Neuropsychologia.

[18]  Patricia A. Reuter-Lorenz,et al.  Modes of Lexical Access in the Callosotomized Brain , 1992, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[19]  J. Sergent Unified response to bilateral hemispheric stimulation by a split-brain patient , 1983, Nature.

[20]  D. O. Hebb,et al.  The organization of behavior , 1988 .

[21]  J. Sergent,et al.  Judgements about numerosity by a commissurotomized subject , 1992, Neuropsychologia.

[22]  Michael S. Gazzaniga,et al.  Interhemispheric relationships: the neocortical commissures; syndromes of hemisphere disconnection , 1969 .

[23]  Larry E. Johnson Bilateral visual cross-integration by human forebrain commissurotomy subjects , 1984, Neuropsychologia.

[24]  J. Bogen,et al.  Completeness of callosotomy shown by magnetic resonance imaging in the long term. , 1988, Archives of neurology.

[25]  A. Lambert Interhemispheric interaction in the split-brain , 1991, Neuropsychologia.

[26]  M S Gazzaniga,et al.  Variability in right hemisphere language function after callosal section: evidence for a continuum of generative capacity , 1981, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[27]  M. Gazzaniga The Bisected Brain , 1970 .

[28]  Michael S. Gazzaniga,et al.  Evidence of foveal splitting in a commissurotomy patient , 1989, Neuropsychologia.

[29]  M. Gazzaniga,et al.  Hemispheric processing of spatial frequencies in two commissurotomy patients , 1990, Neuropsychologia.

[30]  J. Sergent,et al.  Furtive incursions into bicameral minds. Integrative and coordinating role of subcortical structures. , 1990, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[31]  Jeffrey D. Holtzman,et al.  Interactions between cortical and subcortical visual areas: Evidence from human commissurotomy patients , 1984, Vision Research.

[32]  P. Reuter-Lorenz,et al.  Orienting Attention across the Vertical Meridian: Evidence from Callosotomy Patients , 1990, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[33]  J D Holtzman,et al.  Dissociation of spatial information for stimulus localization and the control of attention. , 1981, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[34]  C. Hamilton,et al.  Interocular transfer of reversed and nonreversed discrimination via the anterior commissure in monkeys. , 1973, Physiology & behavior.

[35]  R. Sperry Mental unity following surgical disconnection of the cerebral hemispheres. , 1966, Harvey lectures.

[36]  J. Sergent Subcortical coordination of hemisphere activity in commissurotomized patients. , 1986, Brain : a journal of neurology.