Iteratively improving Hi-C experiments one step at a time.

The 3D organization of eukaryotic chromosomes affects key processes such as gene expression, DNA replication, cell division, and response to DNA damage. The genome-wide chromosome conformation capture (Hi-C) approach can characterize the landscape of 3D genome organization by measuring interaction frequencies between all genomic regions. Hi-C protocol improvements and rapid advances in DNA sequencing power have made Hi-C useful to study diverse biological systems, not only to elucidate the role of 3D genome structure in proper cellular function, but also to characterize genomic rearrangements, assemble new genomes, and consider chromatin interactions as potential biomarkers for diseases. Yet, the Hi-C protocol is still complex and subject to variations at numerous steps that can affect the resulting data. Thus, there is still a need for better understanding and control of factors that contribute to Hi-C experiment success and data quality. Here, we evaluate recently proposed Hi-C protocol modifications as well as often overlooked variables in sample preparation and examine their effects on Hi-C data quality. We examine artifacts that can occur during Hi-C library preparation, including microhomology-based artificial template copying and chimera formation that can add noise to the downstream data. Exploring the mechanisms underlying Hi-C artifacts pinpoints steps that should be further optimized in the future. To improve the utility of Hi-C in characterizing the 3D genome of specialized populations of cells or small samples of primary tissue, we identify steps prone to DNA loss which should be considered to adapt Hi-C to lower cell numbers.

[1]  E. Crespan,et al.  Microhomology-mediated DNA strand annealing and elongation by human DNA polymerases λ and β on normal and repetitive DNA sequences , 2012, Nucleic acids research.

[2]  D. E. Olins,et al.  Nucleosome repositioning during differentiation of a human myeloid leukemia cell line , 2017, Nucleus.

[3]  William Stafford Noble,et al.  GenomeDISCO: A concordance score for chromosome conformation capture experiments using random walks on contact map graphs , 2017 .

[4]  A S Belmont,et al.  In vivo localization of DNA sequences and visualization of large-scale chromatin organization using lac operator/repressor recognition , 1996, The Journal of cell biology.

[5]  J. Dekker,et al.  The hierarchy of the 3D genome. , 2013, Molecular cell.

[6]  L. Mirny,et al.  Iterative Correction of Hi-C Data Reveals Hallmarks of Chromosome Organization , 2012, Nature Methods.

[7]  Sigal Shachar,et al.  Identification of Gene Positioning Factors Using High-Throughput Imaging Mapping , 2015, Cell.

[8]  A. Visel,et al.  Disruptions of Topological Chromatin Domains Cause Pathogenic Rewiring of Gene-Enhancer Interactions , 2015, Cell.

[9]  J. Aldrich,et al.  In situ fixation and subsequent collection of cultured endothelial cells in a shear flow , 2019, MethodsX.

[10]  Job Dekker,et al.  Invariant TAD Boundaries Constrain Cell-Type-Specific Looping Interactions between Promoters and Distal Elements around the CFTR Locus. , 2016, American journal of human genetics.

[11]  S. Zhong,et al.  3D Chromatin Architecture of Large Plant Genomes Determined by Local A/B Compartments. , 2017, Molecular plant.

[12]  A. Villeneuve,et al.  A streamlined tethered chromosome conformation capture protocol , 2016, BMC Genomics.

[13]  Andrew S. Belmont,et al.  Large-scale chromatin organization: the good, the surprising, and the still perplexing. , 2014, Current opinion in cell biology.

[14]  D. Sheer,et al.  The role of microhomology in genomic structural variation. , 2014, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[15]  William Stafford Noble,et al.  Topologically associating domains and their long-range contacts are established during early G1 coincident with the establishment of the replication-timing program , 2015, Genome research.

[16]  Shaojie Zhang,et al.  Multicolor CRISPR labeling of chromosomal loci in human cells , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  J. Dekker,et al.  Capturing Chromosome Conformation , 2002, Science.

[18]  P. Fraser,et al.  Capturing Three-Dimensional Genome Organization in Individual Cells by Single-Cell Hi-C. , 2017, Methods in molecular biology.

[19]  J. Telenius,et al.  Multiplexed analysis of chromosome conformation at vastly improved sensitivity , 2015, Nature Methods.

[20]  H. Bryant DNA double-strand break damage and repair assessed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. , 2012, Methods in molecular biology.

[21]  John K. McCooke,et al.  A chromosome conformation capture ordered sequence of the barley genome , 2017, Nature.

[22]  Rolf Ohlsson,et al.  High-resolution circular chromosome conformation capture assay , 2008, Nature Protocols.

[23]  J. Dekker,et al.  Hi-C: a comprehensive technique to capture the conformation of genomes. , 2012, Methods.

[24]  M. Bulyk,et al.  Distant cis-regulatory elements in human skeletal muscle differentiation. , 2011, Genomics.

[25]  Job Dekker,et al.  Organization of the Mitotic Chromosome , 2013, Science.

[26]  Edgars Celms,et al.  Topological structure analysis of chromatin interaction networks , 2019, BMC Bioinformatics.

[27]  L. Mirny,et al.  The 3D Genome as Moderator of Chromosomal Communication , 2016, Cell.

[28]  B. Steensel,et al.  Nuclear organization of active and inactive chromatin domains uncovered by chromosome conformation capture–on-chip (4C) , 2006, Nature Genetics.

[29]  Donald E. Olins,et al.  Spheroid Chromatin Units (ν Bodies) , 1974, Science.

[30]  Victor O. Leshyk,et al.  The 4D nucleome project , 2017, Nature.

[31]  Job Dekker,et al.  Hi-C 2.0: An optimized Hi-C procedure for high-resolution genome-wide mapping of chromosome conformation. , 2017, Methods.

[32]  Rachel Patton McCord,et al.  Correlated alterations in genome organization, histone methylation, and DNA–lamin A/C interactions in Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome , 2013, Genome research.

[33]  G. Shivashankar,et al.  Nuclear deformability and telomere dynamics are regulated by cell geometric constraints , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  Noam Kaplan,et al.  High-throughput genome scaffolding from in-vivo DNA interaction frequency , 2013, Nature Biotechnology.

[35]  L. Mirny,et al.  The genome-wide multi-layered architecture of chromosome pairing in early Drosophila embryos , 2019, Nature Communications.

[36]  J. Dekker,et al.  Condensin-Driven Remodeling of X-Chromosome Topology during Dosage Compensation , 2015, Nature.

[37]  C. Pilarsky,et al.  Cancer Is Associated with Alterations in the Three-Dimensional Organization of the Genome , 2019, Cancers.

[38]  N. Destainville,et al.  Physics of base-pairing dynamics in DNA , 2015, 1510.05574.

[39]  Nick Kepper,et al.  Targeted Chromatin Capture (T2C): a novel high resolution high throughput method to detect genomic interactions and regulatory elements , 2014, Epigenetics & Chromatin.

[40]  P. Fraser,et al.  Comparison of Hi-C results using in-solution versus in-nucleus ligation , 2015, Genome Biology.

[41]  K. Sandhu,et al.  Circular chromosome conformation capture (4C) uncovers extensive networks of epigenetically regulated intra- and interchromosomal interactions , 2006, Nature Genetics.

[42]  C. Nusbaum,et al.  Chromosome Conformation Capture Carbon Copy (5C): a massively parallel solution for mapping interactions between genomic elements. , 2006, Genome research.

[43]  M. Lieber,et al.  The mechanism of double-strand DNA break repair by the nonhomologous DNA end-joining pathway. , 2010, Annual review of biochemistry.

[44]  I. Amit,et al.  Comprehensive mapping of long range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome , 2011 .

[45]  Anthony D. Schmitt,et al.  Genome-wide mapping and analysis of chromosome architecture , 2016, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[46]  Stefan Schoenfelder,et al.  Hi-C as a tool for precise detection and characterisation of chromosomal rearrangements and copy number variation in human tumours , 2017, Genome Biology.

[47]  Andrew C. Adey,et al.  Chromosome-scale scaffolding of de novo genome assemblies based on chromatin interactions , 2013, Nature Biotechnology.

[48]  Noam Kaplan,et al.  The Hitchhiker's guide to Hi-C analysis: practical guidelines. , 2015, Methods.

[49]  Howard Y. Chang,et al.  HiChIP: efficient and sensitive analysis of protein-directed genome architecture , 2016, Nature Methods.

[50]  Brian L. Frey,et al.  Formaldehyde Crosslinking: A Tool for the Study of Chromatin Complexes* , 2015, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[51]  Nuno A. Fonseca,et al.  Two independent modes of chromatin organization revealed by cohesin removal , 2017, Nature.

[52]  M. Gobbi,et al.  Analysis of hundreds of cis-regulatory landscapes at high resolution in a single, high-throughput experiment , 2014, Nature Genetics.

[53]  K. Yoshikawa,et al.  Chromatin Compaction Protects Genomic DNA from Radiation Damage , 2013, PloS one.

[54]  Neva C. Durand,et al.  A 3D Map of the Human Genome at Kilobase Resolution Reveals Principles of Chromatin Looping , 2014, Cell.

[55]  R. Houlston,et al.  Capture Hi-C identifies the chromatin interactome of colorectal cancer risk loci , 2015, Nature Communications.

[56]  Michael S. Becker,et al.  Spatial Organization of the Mouse Genome and Its Role in Recurrent Chromosomal Translocations , 2012, Cell.