Early postoperative oral feeding shortens first time of bowel evacuation and prevents long term hospital stay in patients undergoing elective small intestine anastomosis

Aim: This study was conducted to compare outcome of early oral feeding (EOF) versus traditional oral feeding (TOF) in patients undergoing elective small intestine anastomosis. Background: Appropriate nutritional support after major surgeries is a real medical concern. As traditional surgical techniques have been replaced by novel methods, postoperative care should be revised as well. Early postoperative oral feeding was studied in trauma and burn. However, there are few trials among patients after major surgeries. Methods: This randomized single-blinded controlled trial was performed on 108 patients who had small intestine anastomosis at Imam Hossein Medical Centre in 2012. The patients were randomly assigned to schedule EOF (with starting oral feeding on the first day after surgery and complete return of the Gag reflex) or TOF (with delaying oral feeding till first passage of flatus and bowel movement). We compared overall prevalence of postoperative complication, length of hospital stay and outcome of surgery in two groups. Results: The time of the first passage of stool was shorter in EOF group than in TOF group (3.2 ± 0.59 days versus 3.6 ± 0.66 days (p= 0.006). The mean length of hospital stay in EOF group was also shorter than in TOF group (3.8 ± 1.06 days versus 6.3 ± 1.0 days, p= 0.001). The length of hospital stay shorter than 4 days was found in 75.9% of patients in EOF group and 11.1% of those patients in TOF group (p < 0.001). Conclusion: The use of EOF in patients undergoing small intestine anastomosis can shorten time of the first passage of stool as well as reduce length of hospital stay.

[1]  M. Samsami,et al.  Early Versus Delayed (Traditional) Postoperative Oral Feeding in Patients Undergoing Colorectal Anastomosis , 2018, Advanced biomedical research.

[2]  A. Baghestani,et al.  Years of life lost due to gastric cancer is increased after Bayesian correcting for misclassification in Iranian population , 2016, Gastroenterology and hepatology from bed to bench.

[3]  B. Schirmer,et al.  Early Oral Feeding as Compared With Traditional Timing of Oral Feeding After Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis , 2016, Annals of surgery.

[4]  Liansheng Zheng,et al.  Is Early Oral Feeding after Gastric Cancer Surgery Feasible? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials , 2014, PloS one.

[5]  N. Gibran,et al.  Early Enteral Nutrition for Burn Injury. , 2014, Advances in wound care.

[6]  M. Radman,et al.  Early initiation of enteral nutrition improves outcomes in burn disease. , 2013, Asia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition.

[7]  P. Thapa,et al.  Early enteral feeding in intestinal anastomosis. , 2011, Journal of Nepal Health Research Council.

[8]  Shahjahan Khan,et al.  Early versus traditional postoperative feeding in patients undergoing resectional gastrointestinal surgery: a meta-analysis. , 2011, JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition.

[9]  B. Kurt,et al.  Fascin expression in colorectal carcinomas , 2010, Clinics.

[10]  M. Bozer,et al.  Effects of the Histamine H2 Receptor Antagonist Famotidine on the Healing of Colonic Anastomosis in Rats , 2009, Clinics.

[11]  B. Gulec,et al.  Persistent High Postoperative Carcinoembryonic Antigen in Colorectal Cancer Patients- Is it Important? , 2009, Clinics.

[12]  A. Campos,et al.  Influence of preoperative feeding on the healing of colonic anastomoses in malnourished rats. , 2009, JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition.

[13]  Wei-Dong Fan,et al.  Early removing gastrointestinal decompression and early oral feeding improve patients' rehabilitation after colorectostomy. , 2006, World journal of gastroenterology.

[14]  H. Kehlet,et al.  Convalescence after Colonic Resection with Fast-Track versus Conventional Care , 2004, Scandinavian journal of surgery : SJS : official organ for the Finnish Surgical Society and the Scandinavian Surgical Society.

[15]  Stephen J Lewis,et al.  Early enteral feeding versus “nil by mouth” after gastrointestinal surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[16]  J. Müller,et al.  [Tolerance of early oral feeding after operations of the lower gastrointestinal tract]. , 2000, Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen.

[17]  H. Demetriades,et al.  Effect of Early Postoperative Enteral Feeding on the Healing of Colonic Anastomoses in Rats , 1999, European Surgical Research.

[18]  J. Schilder,et al.  A prospective controlled trial of early postoperative oral intake following major abdominal gynecologic surgery. , 1997, Gynecologic oncology.

[19]  E. Weiss,et al.  Is Early Oral Feeding Safe After Elective Colorectal Surgery? A Prospective Randomized Trial , 1995, Annals of surgery.

[20]  W. Chapman,et al.  A meta-analysis of selective versus routine nasogastric decompression after elective laparotomy. , 1995, Annals of surgery.

[21]  E. Moore,et al.  Early Enteral Feeding, Compared With Parenteral, Reduces Postoperative Septic Complications The Results of a Meta‐Analysis , 1992, Annals of surgery.

[22]  M Jacobs,et al.  Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). , 1991, Surgical laparoscopy & endoscopy.

[23]  W. Hammond,et al.  Nutritional support in surgical practice: Part II. , 1990, American journal of surgery.

[24]  G. Moss Is routine postoperative nasogastric decompression really necessary? , 1985, Annals of surgery.