Performance in international computer science collaboration between distributed student teams

Technology has developed such that it allows for effective remote collaboration. International collaboration gives students the opportunity to use different technologies for collaboration across time and distance as well as problem-solving experience with different cultures in a team-based environment. This paper investigates the interactions of highand low performing distributed student teams. These teams were involved in a software development project, part of a computer science course at two universities. A set of categories was developed for this study to examine the communication produced. This paper tracks the progression and changes in each team's communication via coded categories. In particular, the use of communication media available, the amount of communication per team and decision-making patterns throughout the software development process. Results indicate that not only is communication crucial to a team's success but the process and timing of specific actions can have an impact on a team's performance.

[1]  Olugbemiro J. Jegede,et al.  Help-Seeking Strategies Used by High-Achieving and Low-Achieving Distance Education Students , 2001 .

[2]  M. S. Poole.  Decision development in small groups: III. A multiple sequence model of group decision development. , 1983 .

[3]  Mark R. Woodroffe,et al.  Team Performance Factors in Distributed Collaborative Software Development , 2001, PPIG.

[4]  T. Mills,et al.  The Sociology of Small Groups , 1968 .

[5]  J. Kidd.  Management Teams: Why They Succeed or Fail , 1982 .

[6]  Marshall Scott Poole,et al.  Decision development in small groups I: A comparison of two models , 1981 .

[7]  Vicki L. Almstrum,et al.  Interaction factors in software development performance in distributed student teams in computer science , 2001, ITiCSE '01.

[8]  Hugh Coolican.  Research Methods and Statistics in Psychology , 1993 .

[9]  M. Daniels,et al.  RUNESTONE, an international student collaboration project , 1998, FIE '98. 28th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Moving from 'Teacher-Centered' to 'Learner-Centered' Education. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.98CH36214).

[10]  Mats Daniels,et al.  Learning from students: continuous improvement in international collaboration , 2002, ITiCSE '02.

[11]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Building A Global Learning Community , 2001, CACM.

[12]  Michael W. Kramer,et al.  Interpersonal communication. , 1977, Australian family physician.

[13]  Vicki L. Almstrum,et al.  Interaction factors in software development performance in distributed student teams in computer science , 2001 .

[14]  Roger S. Pressman,et al.  Software Engineering: A Practitioner's Approach , 1982 .

[15]  Judith S. Olson,et al.  Small Group Design Meetings: An Analysis of Collaboration , 1992, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[16]  Anders Berglund,et al.  Are you guys really concerned about the grades , 2002 .

[17]  R. Bales,et al.  Phases in group problem-solving. , 1951, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[18]  Stephanie D. Teasley,et al.  How does radical collocation help a team succeed? , 2000, CSCW '00.