Joint calibrated estimation of inverse probability of treatment and censoring weights for marginal structural models

Marginal structural models (MSMs) with inverse probability weighted estimators (IPWEs) are widely used to estimate causal effects of treatment sequences on longitudinal outcomes in the presence of time-varying confounding and dependent censoring. However, IPWEs for MSMs can be inefficient and unstable if weights are estimated by maximum likelihood. To improve the performance of IPWEs, covariate balancing weight (CBW) methods have been proposed and recently extended to MSMs. However, existing CBW methods for MSMs are inflexible for practical use because they often do not handle dependent censoring, non-binary treatments, and longitudinal outcomes (instead of eventual outcomes at a study end). In this paper, we propose a joint calibration approach to CBW estimation for MSMs that can accommodate (1) both time-varying confounding and dependent censoring, (2) binary and non-binary treatments, (3) eventual outcomes and longitudinal outcomes. We develop novel calibration restrictions by jointly eliminating covariate associations with both treatment assignment and censoring processes after weighting the observed data sample (i.e., to optimize covariate balance in finite samples). Two different methods are proposed to implement the calibration. Simulations show that IPWEs with calibrated weights perform better than IPWEs with weights from maximum likelihood and the 'Covariate Balancing Propensity Score' method. We apply our method to a natural history study of HIV for estimating the effects of highly active antiretroviral therapy on CD4 cell counts over time.

[1]  Jing Ning.  Estimating causal treatment effects for post-randomization marker data with failure event censoring , 2008 .

[2]  J. Robins,et al.  Marginal Structural Models to Estimate the Joint Causal Effect of Nonrandomized Treatments , 2001 .

[3]  K. Imai,et al.  Robust Estimation of Inverse Probability Weights for Marginal Structural Models , 2015 .

[4]  Lane F Burgette,et al.  A tutorial on propensity score estimation for multiple treatments using generalized boosted models , 2013, Statistics in medicine.

[5]  J. Robins,et al.  Analysis of semiparametric regression models for repeated outcomes in the presence of missing data , 1995 .

[6]  Chad Hazlett,et al.  Covariate balancing propensity score for a continuous treatment: Application to the efficacy of political advertisements , 2018 .

[7]  M. Davidian,et al.  Improving efficiency and robustness of the doubly robust estimator for a population mean with incomplete data , 2009, Biometrika.

[8]  Sebastian Juhl.  The Sensitivity of Spatial Regression Models to Network Misspecification , 2019, Political Analysis.

[9]  Yixin Wang,et al.  Minimal dispersion approximately balancing weights: asymptotic properties and practical considerations , 2017, Biometrika.

[10]  Zhiqiang Tan,et al.  Regularized calibrated estimation of propensity scores with model misspecification and high-dimensional data , 2017, Biometrika.

[11]  Jens Hainmueller,et al.  Entropy Balancing for Causal Effects: A Multivariate Reweighting Method to Produce Balanced Samples in Observational Studies , 2012, Political Analysis.

[12]  K. C. G. Chan,et al.  Globally efficient non‐parametric inference of average treatment effects by empirical balancing calibration weighting , 2016, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, Statistical methodology.

[13]  S. Vansteelandt,et al.  On model selection and model misspecification in causal inference , 2012, Statistical methods in medical research.

[14]  S. Cole,et al.  American Journal of Epidemiology Practice of Epidemiology Limitation of Inverse Probability-of-censoring Weights in Estimating Survival in the Presence of Strong Selection Bias , 2022 .

[15]  Kari Lock Morgan,et al.  Rerandomization to improve covariate balance in experiments , 2012, 1207.5625.

[16]  Xiang Zhou,et al.  Residual Balancing: A Method of Constructing Weights for Marginal Structural Models , 2018, Political Analysis.

[17]  Gary King,et al.  Misunderstandings between experimentalists and observationalists about causal inference , 2008 .

[18]  Joseph Kang,et al.  Demystifying Double Robustness: A Comparison of Alternative Strategies for Estimating a Population Mean from Incomplete Data , 2007, 0804.2958.

[19]  J. Robins,et al.  Semiparametric regression estimation in the presence of dependent censoring , 1995 .

[20]  B L De Stavola,et al.  Methods for dealing with time‐dependent confounding , 2013, Statistics in medicine.

[21]  Joseph W Hogan,et al.  Estimating Causal Treatment Effects from Longitudinal HIV Natural History Studies Using Marginal Structural Models , 2003, Biometrics.

[22]  James M. Robins,et al.  Association, Causation, And Marginal Structural Models , 1999, Synthese.

[23]  K. Imai,et al.  Covariate balancing propensity score , 2014 .

[24]  D. Rubin,et al.  The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects , 1983 .

[25]  J. Robins,et al.  Comment: Performance of Double-Robust Estimators When “Inverse Probability” Weights Are Highly Variable , 2007, 0804.2965.

[26]  Geneviève Lefebvre,et al.  Impact of mis‐specification of the treatment model on estimates from a marginal structural model , 2008, Statistics in medicine.

[27]  B. Graham,et al.  Inverse Probability Tilting for Moment Condition Models with Missing Data , 2008 .

[28]  L. Su,et al.  Covariate association eliminating weights: a unified weighting framework for causal effect estimation , 2018, Biometrika.

[29]  J. Robins,et al.  Marginal Structural Models and Causal Inference in Epidemiology , 2000, Epidemiology.

[30]  S. Pocock,et al.  Subgroup analysis, covariate adjustment and baseline comparisons in clinical trial reporting: current practiceand problems , 2002, Statistics in medicine.

[31]  Susan Gruber,et al.  Ensemble learning of inverse probability weights for marginal structural modeling in large observational datasets , 2015, Statistics in medicine.

[32]  Stephen R Cole,et al.  Constructing inverse probability weights for marginal structural models. , 2008, American journal of epidemiology.

[33]  C. Särndal,et al.  Calibration Estimators in Survey Sampling , 1992 .

[34]  Peisong Han,et al.  Intrinsic efficiency and multiple robustness in longitudinal studies with drop-out , 2016 .

[35]  J. Robins,et al.  Semiparametric Efficiency in Multivariate Regression Models with Missing Data , 1995 .

[36]  J. Zubizarreta.  Stable Weights that Balance Covariates for Estimation With Incomplete Outcome Data , 2015 .

[37]  Ashkan Ertefaie,et al.  Outcome‐adaptive lasso: Variable selection for causal inference , 2017, Biometrics.