A hybrid life cycle assessment of water treatment chemicals: an Australian experience

PurposeLife cycle assessment (LCA) of chemicals is usually developed using a process-based approach. In this paper, we develop a tiered hybrid LCA of water treatment chemicals combining the specificity of process data with the holistic nature of input–output analysis (IOA). We compare these results with process and input–output models for the most commonly used chemicals in the Australian water industry to identify the direct and indirect environmental impacts associated with the manufacturing of these materials.MethodsWe have improved a previous Australian hybrid LCA model by updating the environmental indicators and expanding the number of included industry sectors of the economy. We also present an alternative way to estimate the expenditure vectors to the service sectors of the economy when financial data are not available. Process-based, input–output and hybrid results were calculated for caustic soda, sodium hypochlorite, ferric chloride, aluminium sulphate, fluorosilicic acid, calcium oxide and chlorine gas. The functional unit is the same for each chemical: the production of 1 tonne in the year 2008.Results and discussionWe have provided results for seven impact categories: global warming potential; primary energy; water use; marine, freshwater and terrestrial ecotoxicity potentials and human toxicity potential. Results are compared with previous IOA and hybrid studies. A sensitivity analysis of the results to assumed wholesale prices is included. We also present insights regarding how hybrid modelling helps to overcome the limitations of using IO- or process-based modelling individually.Conclusions and recommendationsThe advantages of using hybrid modelling have been demonstrated for water treatment chemicals by expanding the boundaries of process-based modelling and also by reducing the sensitivity of IOA to fluctuations in prices of raw materials used for the production of these industrial commodities. The development of robust hybrid life cycle inventory databases is paramount if hybrid modelling is to become a standard practice in attributional LCA.

[1]  Bryan W. Karney,et al.  Life-Cycle Energy Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory for Water Treatment Systems , 2007 .

[2]  Sangwon Suh,et al.  Input-output and hybrid life cycle assessment , 2003 .

[3]  E. Friedrich,et al.  Life-cycle assessment as an environmental management tool in the production of potable water. , 2002, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[4]  Edgar G. Hertwich,et al.  Evaluation of process- and input-output-based life cycle inventory data with regard to truncation and aggregation issues. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[5]  Sven Lundie,et al.  A hybrid life cycle assessment model for comparison with conventional methodologies in Australia , 2009 .

[6]  Gjalt Huppes,et al.  Methods for Life Cycle Inventory of a product , 2005 .

[7]  Grecia R. Matos,et al.  Historical Statistics for Mineral and Material Commodities in the United States , 2005 .

[8]  Stephan Pfister,et al.  Review of methods addressing freshwater use in life cycle inventory and impact assessment , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[9]  Stefanie Hellweg,et al.  Establishing Life Cycle Inventories of Chemicals Based on Differing Data Availability (9 pp) , 2005 .

[10]  A. Horvath,et al.  Life-Cycle Assessment of Urban Water Provision: Tool and Case Study in California , 2011 .

[11]  Maarten A. Siebel,et al.  Environmental and financial life cycle impact assessment of drinking water production at Waternet , 2008 .

[12]  M. Lenzen,et al.  The path exchange method for hybrid LCA. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[13]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  Balancing Act : a Triple Bottom Line Analysis of the Australian Economy , 2005 .

[14]  W. Leontief.  Environmental Repercussions and the Economic Structure: An Input-Output Approach , 1970 .

[15]  O. Edenhofer,et al.  Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) , 2013 .

[16]  Barbara C. Lippiatt,et al.  Framework for hybrid life cycle inventory databases: a case study on the Building for Environmental and Economic Sustainability (BEES) database , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[17]  David Pennington,et al.  Recent developments in Life Cycle Assessment. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[18]  Luis M. Serra,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of Water Production Technologies - Part 1: Life Cycle Assessment of Different Commercial Desalination Technologies (MSF, MED, RO) (9 pp) , 2005 .

[19]  Maarten A. Siebel,et al.  Improving eco-efficiency of Amsterdam water supply: A LCA approach , 2002 .

[20]  François Maréchal,et al.  LCA tool for the environmental evaluation of potable water production , 2008 .

[21]  Gregory M Peters,et al.  Life cycle assessment for sustainable metropolitan water systems planning. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[22]  Matthias Schulz,et al.  Sustainability of water and wastewater treatment chemicals: development of Australian life cycle inventory data , 2011 .