Purpose: In lean management, productivity is increased by d oing the right things and minimising the unnecessary ones. To achieve this, t e ‘right things’ need to be identified. Customer value provides us with a minds et about how to gain a deeper understanding of what should be delivered. In this paper, a method called the Kano model is used to define customer value. The aim is to define how customers perceive the value and, thus, to assist in identifying the r ight things. The customers are the nursing companies and their nursing staff in Finlan d d special focus is given to the value potentials that building information modellin g (BIM) as well as improved environmental performance might offer to the custom ers. Method: An in-depth understanding of customer value as it relates to nursing homes was studied by conducting 20 structured customer in t rviews that contained a Kano model-based questionnaire and open-ended oral quest ions. Findings: The data shows that details really matter for the customer: design errors and construction flaws were seen to impact vitally on the daily nursing activities. The value that could be delivered through BIM to preven t design errors was perceived as being highly attractive. However, in addition to th e traditional value attributes, such as error-free design and better communication, the customers found that if BIM could be utilized to improve the actual nursing processes , and not just to match the facilities with the requirements of the current processes, ric he customer value could be delivered. Traditional construction process flow im provements, such as a faster construction process, are no longer enough for crea ting richer customer value. Implications: The new understanding of customers’ perceptions of BIM reduces some of the doubts and uncertainties regarding the utility of BIM. The results clearly indicate that through BIM, construction companies w ould have an opportunity to improve their value delivery for the customers.
[1]
Christine Pasquire,et al.
Value theory in lean construction
,
2011
.
[2]
Stephen Emmitt,et al.
The Value Universe: Defining a Value Based Approach to Lean Construction
,
2005
.
[3]
Rogier Jongeling,et al.
Design reviews and decision-making using collaborative virtual reality prototypes : a case study of the large scale mk3 project
,
2005
.
[4]
Anders Björnfot,et al.
Prefabrication: A Lean Strategy for Value Generation in Construction
,
2006
.
[5]
Arnold Reisman,et al.
Mass customization research: trends, directions, diffusion intensity, and taxonomic frameworks
,
2007
.
[6]
Carlos T. Formoso,et al.
Considerations on Application of Lean Construction Principles to Design Management
,
1999
.
[7]
N. Kano,et al.
Attractive Quality and Must-Be Quality
,
1984
.
[8]
Kurt Matzler,et al.
How to delight your customers
,
1996
.
[9]
David Leifer.
Evaluating user satisfaction: case studies in Australasia
,
1998
.
[10]
Lauri Koskela,et al.
An exploration towards a production theory and its application to construction
,
2000
.
[11]
Lauri Koskela,et al.
MANAGING THE THREE ASPECTS OF PRODUCTION IN CONSTRUCTION
,
2002
.
[12]
Barry Berman,et al.
How to Delight Your Customers
,
2005
.
[13]
Carlos T. Formoso,et al.
Client Requirement Management in Building Projects
,
2003
.
[14]
Pekka Huovila,et al.
The House of the Rising Value
,
2000
.
[15]
Jessica Ö. rn,et al.
Methods for Evaluating Office Occupiersí Needs and Preferences
,
2009
.
[16]
Rianne Appel-Meulenbroek,et al.
Managing "keep" factors of office tenants to raise satisfaction and loyalty
,
2008
.
[17]
Lars Witell,et al.
Two Decades of Using Kano's Theory of Attractive Quality: A Literature Review
,
2008
.
[18]
Sami Kärnä,et al.
Modelling structure of customer satisfaction with construction
,
2009
.