Using the Kano Model to Identify Customer Value

Purpose: In lean management, productivity is increased by d oing the right things and minimising the unnecessary ones. To achieve this, t e ‘right things’ need to be identified. Customer value provides us with a minds et about how to gain a deeper understanding of what should be delivered. In this paper, a method called the Kano model is used to define customer value. The aim is to define how customers perceive the value and, thus, to assist in identifying the r ight things. The customers are the nursing companies and their nursing staff in Finlan d d special focus is given to the value potentials that building information modellin g (BIM) as well as improved environmental performance might offer to the custom ers. Method: An in-depth understanding of customer value as it relates to nursing homes was studied by conducting 20 structured customer in t rviews that contained a Kano model-based questionnaire and open-ended oral quest ions. Findings: The data shows that details really matter for the customer: design errors and construction flaws were seen to impact vitally on the daily nursing activities. The value that could be delivered through BIM to preven t design errors was perceived as being highly attractive. However, in addition to th e traditional value attributes, such as error-free design and better communication, the customers found that if BIM could be utilized to improve the actual nursing processes , and not just to match the facilities with the requirements of the current processes, ric he customer value could be delivered. Traditional construction process flow im provements, such as a faster construction process, are no longer enough for crea ting richer customer value. Implications: The new understanding of customers’ perceptions of BIM reduces some of the doubts and uncertainties regarding the utility of BIM. The results clearly indicate that through BIM, construction companies w ould have an opportunity to improve their value delivery for the customers.

[1]  Christine Pasquire,et al.  Value theory in lean construction , 2011 .

[2]  Stephen Emmitt,et al.  The Value Universe: Defining a Value Based Approach to Lean Construction , 2005 .

[3]  Rogier Jongeling,et al.  Design reviews and decision-making using collaborative virtual reality prototypes : a case study of the large scale mk3 project , 2005 .

[4]  Anders Björnfot,et al.  Prefabrication: A Lean Strategy for Value Generation in Construction , 2006 .

[5]  Arnold Reisman,et al.  Mass customization research: trends, directions, diffusion intensity, and taxonomic frameworks , 2007 .

[6]  Carlos T. Formoso,et al.  Considerations on Application of Lean Construction Principles to Design Management , 1999 .

[7]  N. Kano,et al.  Attractive Quality and Must-Be Quality , 1984 .

[8]  Kurt Matzler,et al.  How to delight your customers , 1996 .

[9]  David Leifer Evaluating user satisfaction: case studies in Australasia , 1998 .

[10]  Lauri Koskela,et al.  An exploration towards a production theory and its application to construction , 2000 .

[11]  Lauri Koskela,et al.  MANAGING THE THREE ASPECTS OF PRODUCTION IN CONSTRUCTION , 2002 .

[12]  Barry Berman,et al.  How to Delight Your Customers , 2005 .

[13]  Carlos T. Formoso,et al.  Client Requirement Management in Building Projects , 2003 .

[14]  Pekka Huovila,et al.  The House of the Rising Value , 2000 .

[15]  Jessica Ö. rn,et al.  Methods for Evaluating Office Occupiersí Needs and Preferences , 2009 .

[16]  Rianne Appel-Meulenbroek,et al.  Managing "keep" factors of office tenants to raise satisfaction and loyalty , 2008 .

[17]  Lars Witell,et al.  Two Decades of Using Kano's Theory of Attractive Quality: A Literature Review , 2008 .

[18]  Sami Kärnä,et al.  Modelling structure of customer satisfaction with construction , 2009 .