An empirical study on organizational acceptance of new information systems in a commercial bank environment

This study empirically examines the acceptance of new information systems in a commercial bank environment. The modified technology acceptance model is used to examine organizational acceptance, staff satisfaction, superior satisfaction, customer satisfaction, system reliability, user friendliness, perceived usefulness, and perceived ease of use. The results show perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use have a significant effect. However, perceived usefulness was found to be a more important determinant on information technology acceptance than perceived ease of use. The results also confirm staff satisfaction and system reliability as significant variables representing perceived usefulness and ease of use.

[1]  Niv Ahituv,et al.  A Systematic Approach Toward Assessing the Value of an Information System , 1980, MIS Q..

[2]  Paul B. Cragg,et al.  End user computing sophistication and success in small firms , 1996 .

[3]  Chee-Sing Yap,et al.  Impact of consultants on computerization success in small businesses , 1992, Inf. Manag..

[4]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[5]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use, and Usage of Information Technology: A Replication , 1992, MIS Q..

[6]  R. F. Powers,et al.  MisProject Management: Myths, Opinions, and Reality , 1973 .

[7]  Louis Raymond,et al.  Personal DSS success in small enterprises , 1992, Inf. Manag..

[8]  Leon A. Kappelman,et al.  A Comprehensive Model for Assessing the Quality and Productivity of the Information Systems Function: Toward a Theory for Information Systems Assessment , 1997 .

[9]  William H. DeLone.  Determinants of Success for Computer Usage in Small Business , 1988, MIS Q..

[10]  Ali R. Montazemi,et al.  Factors Affecting Information Satisfaction in the Context of the Small Business Environment , 1988, MIS Q..

[11]  Jennifer L. Hartnett,et al.  Managing Quality: The Strategic and Competitive Edge , 1988 .

[12]  Abdulla H. Abdul-Gader,et al.  The Impact of User Satisfaction on Computer-Mediated Communication Acceptance: A Causal Path Model , 1996 .

[13]  J. Nunamaker,et al.  Proceedings of the 32nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences , 1999 .

[14]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Measuring System Usage: Implications for IS Theory Testing , 1995 .

[15]  Jenny Owen,et al.  Job design within a human centred (system) design framework , 1992 .

[16]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  Testing the Determinants of Microcomputer Usage via a Structural Equation Model , 1995, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[17]  Blake Ives,et al.  User Involvement and MIS Success: A Review of Research , 1984 .

[18]  H OlsonMargrethe,et al.  User Involvement and MIS Success , 1984 .

[19]  Donald H. Bender,et al.  Financial Impact of Information Processing , 1986, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[20]  Fred D. Davis.  A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems : theory and results , 1985 .

[21]  Bernadette Szajna,et al.  Empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model , 1996 .

[22]  Gerald L. Matlin,et al.  SIM Competition Paper: What Is the Value of Investment in Information Systems? , 1979, MIS Q..

[23]  Svante Hovmark,et al.  Social and psychological aspects of computer-aided design systems , 1993, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[24]  Louis Raymond,et al.  Organizational Characteristics and MIS Success in the Context of Small Business , 1985, MIS Q..

[25]  Patrick Y. K. Chau,et al.  An Empirical Assessment of a Modified Technology Acceptance Model , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[26]  Abdulla Hasan Abdul-Gader,et al.  End User Computing Success Factors: Further Evidence from a Developing Nation , 1992 .

[27]  Nancy C. Goodwin,et al.  Functionality and usability , 1987, CACM.

[28]  Trevor A. Williams,et al.  Information technology and self managing work groups , 1994, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[29]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[30]  G. Lawrence Sanders,et al.  Implementation and structural variables , 1986, Inf. Manag..

[31]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  An examination of the factors contributing to microcomputer technology acceptance , 1994 .

[32]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[33]  Louis Raymond,et al.  Validating and applying user satisfaction as a measure of MIS success in small organizations , 1987, Inf. Manag..

[34]  A. Bandura.  Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency , 2024, Psihologìâ ì suspìlʹstvo.

[35]  Armand V. Feigenbaum,et al.  Total quality control , 1961 .

[36]  R. Eccles.  The performance measurement manifesto. , 1991, Harvard business review.

[37]  Louis Raymond,et al.  End-user computing in the small business context: foundations and directions for research , 1990, DATB.

[38]  Kieran Mathieson,et al.  Predicting User Intentions: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behavior , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[39]  Henry C. Lucas,et al.  Implementation: The Key to Successful Information Systems , 1981 .

[40]  Sammy W. Pearson,et al.  Development of a Tool for Measuring and Analyzing Computer User Satisfaction , 1983 .

[41]  Chris W. Clegg,et al.  Human and organizational issues in information systems development , 1992 .

[42]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  If we build it, they will come: Designing information systems that people want to use , 1994 .

[43]  Chris W. Clegg,et al.  Social systems that marginalize the psychological and organizational aspects of information technology , 1993, Behav. Inf. Technol..