A hybrid approach to robustness analyses of flight control laws in re-entry applications

Abstract The present paper aims at improving the efficiency of the robustness analyses of flight control laws with respect to conventional techniques, especially when applied to vehicles following time-varying reference trajectories, such as in an atmospheric re-entry. A nonlinear robustness criterion is proposed, stemming from the practical stability framework, which allows dealing effectively with such cases. A novel approach is presented, which exploits the convexity of linear time varying systems, coupled to an approximate description of the original nonlinear system by a certain number of its time-varying linearizations. The suitability of the approximating systems is evaluated in a probabilistic fashion making use of the unscented transformation technique. The effectiveness and potentials of the method are ascertained by application to the robustness analysis of the longitudinal flight control laws of the Italian Aerospace Research Center (CIRA) experimental vehicle USV.

[1]  Antonio Moccia,et al.  Allowable Aerodynamics Uncertainties Synthesis Aimed at Dynamics Properties Assessment for an Unmanned Space Vehicle , 2004 .

[2]  Massimiliano Pastena,et al.  PRORA USV1: The First Italian Experimental Vehicle to the Aerospace Plane , 2005 .

[3]  Ho Chul Lee,et al.  Linear time-varying eigenstructure assignment with flight control application , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[4]  Hugh F. Durrant-Whyte,et al.  A new method for the nonlinear transformation of means and covariances in filters and estimators , 2000, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[5]  Antoine Girard,et al.  Hybridization methods for the analysis of nonlinear systems , 2007, Acta Informatica.

[6]  J. D. Gamble.  The application of aerodynamic uncertainties in the design of the entry trajectory and flight control system of the space shuttle orbiter , 1983 .

[7]  Nando de Freitas,et al.  The Unscented Particle Filter , 2000, NIPS.

[8]  Peter Dorato,et al.  An Overview of Finite-Time Stability , 2006 .

[9]  Federico Corraro,et al.  A NOVEL METHOD FOR FLIGHT CONTROL LAWS ROBUSTNESS ANALYSIS OVER UNSTEADY TRAJECTORIES , 2007 .

[10]  C. Desoer,et al.  Feedback Systems: Input-Output Properties , 1975 .

[11]  Luca Zaccarian,et al.  Current trends in nonlinear systems and control : in honor of Petar Kokotović and Turi Nicosia , 2006 .

[12]  Simon J. Julier,et al.  The scaled unscented transformation , 2002, Proceedings of the 2002 American Control Conference (IEEE Cat. No.CH37301).

[13]  Horacio J. Marquez,et al.  Computing the distance between a nonlinear model and its linear approximation: an L2 approach , 2004, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[14]  Jacob K. White,et al.  A trajectory piecewise-linear approach to model order reduction and fast simulation of nonlinear circuits and micromachined devices , 2001, IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer Aided Design. ICCAD 2001. IEEE/ACM Digest of Technical Papers (Cat. No.01CH37281).

[15]  Antonio Moccia,et al.  FLIGHT DYNAMIC CHARACTERISATION OF THE USV-FLYING TEST BED VEHICLE , 2005 .

[16]  Raffaele Votta,et al.  Experimental and Numerical Aerodynamic Data Integration and Aerodatabase Development for the PRORA-USV-FTB_1 Reusable Vehicle , 2006 .

[17]  Kannan M. Moudgalya,et al.  Practical Stability Analysis of Uncertain Nonlinear Systems , 2004 .