Does question order influence sensitivity to scope? Empirical findings from a web-based contingent valuation study
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] A. Tversky,et al. Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk — Source link , 2007 .
[2] Ian J. Bateman,et al. On visible choice sets and scope sensitivity , 2004 .
[3] A. Tversky,et al. Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .
[4] Nicholas E. Flores,et al. Contingent Valuation: Controversies and Evidence , 2000 .
[5] D. Schwappach,et al. "Quick and dirty numbers"? The reliability of a stated-preference technique for the measurement of preferences for resource allocation. , 2006, Journal of health economics.
[6] J. Nielsen. Use of the Internet for willingness-to-pay surveys: A comparison of face-to-face and web-based interviews , 2011 .
[7] Constance F. Citro,et al. Panel surveys: Adding the fourth dimension , 1995 .
[8] Richard H. Thaler,et al. Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice , 1985, Mark. Sci..
[9] Angela Robinson,et al. Responsibility, scale and the valuation of rail safety , 2010 .
[10] P. Slovic. The Construction of Preference , 1995 .
[11] D. Kahneman. Reference points, anchors, norms, and mixed feelings. , 1992 .
[12] Robert Cameron Mitchell,et al. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method , 1989 .
[13] James K. Hammitt,et al. Effects of Disease Type and Latency on the Value of Mortality Risk , 2003 .
[14] J. Baron. Biases in the quantitative measurement of values for public decisions , 1997 .
[15] Dominique Ami,et al. Final Report on the monetary valuation of mortality and morbidity risks from air pollution , 2007 .
[16] Robert Sugden,et al. On Money Pumps , 2001, Games Econ. Behav..
[17] Ian J. Bateman,et al. Ordering effects in nested ‘top-down’ and ‘bottom-up’ contingent valuation designs , 2003 .
[18] Ian J. Bateman,et al. Investigating Insensitivity to Scope: A Split-Sample Test of Perceived Scheme Realism , 2004, Land Economics.
[19] Elizabeth C. Hirschman,et al. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.
[20] D. Ariely,et al. “Coherent Arbitrariness”: Stable Demand Curves Without Stable Preferences , 2003 .
[21] M. Jones-Lee,et al. Valuation of Health Benefits Associated with Reductions in Air Pollution , 2004 .
[22] Daniel Kahneman,et al. Valuing public goods: The purchase of moral satisfaction , 1992 .
[23] Richard D. Smith. Sensitivity to scale in contingent valuation: the importance of the budget constraint. , 2005, Journal of health economics.
[24] I. Bateman,et al. Budget-Constraint, Temporal, and Question-Ordering Effects in Contingent Valuation Studies , 1997 .
[25] W. Michael Hanemann,et al. Valuing the Environment through Contingent Valuation , 1994 .
[26] Eric J. Johnson,et al. Incorporating the Irrelevant: Anchors in Judgments of Belief and Value , 2002 .
[27] Lana Friesen,et al. The causes of order effects in contingent valuation surveys: An experimental investigation , 2008 .
[28] M. Hammerton,et al. THE VALUE OF SAFETY: RESULTS OF A NATIONAL SAMPLE SURVEY. IN: URBAN TRANSPORT , 1985 .
[29] G. Loomes,et al. Imprecise Preferences and Survey Design in Contingent Valuation , 1997 .
[30] Robin Gregory,et al. Why the WTA-WTP disparity matters , 1999 .
[31] Richard C. Bishop,et al. The role of question order and respondent experience in contingent-valuation studies. , 1993 .
[32] Knut Veisten,et al. Scope insensitivity in contingent valuation of complex environmental amenities. , 2004, Journal of environmental management.