Quality of life and nutritional state in patients on home enteral tube feeding.

OBJECTIVE We assessed quality of life (QOL) in patients on home enteral tube feeding (HETF). The data should contribute to ethically justified decision making. METHODS We used a prospective cross-sectional study (study 1) in 155 consecutive patients and a prospective longitudinal study (study 2) with a follow-up of 4 mo in 56 patients. QOL was assessed by proxy rating (Karnofsky and Spitzer indices) and self-rating (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer [EORTC] QLQ C30) extended by a specific module. RESULTS In study 1, weight losses 3 mo before HETF were 10.5 +/- 8.4% and 7.9 +/- 6.3% in competent (P < 0.05) and non-competent (P < 0,05) patients, respectively. The prevalences of severe malnutrition and weight loss were 50% and 73%, respectively. When compared with EORTC reference data for a general population, QOL was lower in HETF patients. The lowest QOL was seen in non-competent patients. Nutrition status explained up to 13% of the variance in QOL. In study 2, nutrition status stabilized or increased slightly in response to HETF. This was true for competent and non-competent patients and for patients with malignant and benign diseases. Concomitantly, physical functioning improved, whereas fatigue decreased. QOL increased in response to HETF in competent and non-competent patients, and 50% of the non-competent patients became competent CONCLUSIONS . Measures of QOL research can be used in HETF patients. QOL is reduced in patients on HETF. Part of this effect is explained by malnutrition. HETF can prevent further weight loss and improve some aspects of QOL, thus allowing physicians to focus on patients.

[1]  B. Jennett,et al.  Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. , 1974, Lancet.

[2]  D. Hand,et al.  Factor analysis, causal indicators and quality of life , 1997, Quality of Life Research.

[3]  L. Rabeneck,et al.  Long-term outcomes of patients receiving percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes , 1996, Journal of general internal medicine.

[4]  M. Gillick Rethinking the role of tube feeding in patients with advanced dementia. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  I J Higginson,et al.  Using quality of life measures in the clinical setting , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[6]  N. Aaronson,et al.  The European Organization for Research and treatment of cancer approach to quality of life assessment: guidelines for developing questionnaire modules , 1993, Quality of Life Research.

[7]  M. Bullinger [Health related quality of life and subjective health. Overview of the status of research for new evaluation criteria in medicine]. , 1997, Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik, medizinische Psychologie.

[8]  A. Zinsmeister,et al.  Predictors of outcome after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a community-based study. , 1992, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[9]  J. Cramer,et al.  Agreement between self reports and proxy reports of quality of life in epilepsy patients , 1995, Quality of Life Research.

[10]  T M Gill,et al.  A critical appraisal of the quality of quality-of-life measurements. , 1994, JAMA.

[11]  A. Board Guidelines for the use of parenteral and enteral nutrition in adult and pediatric patients. American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. , 1993, JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition.

[12]  M. Elia An international perspective on artificial nutritional support in the community , 1995, The Lancet.

[13]  P. Ballmer,et al.  Praxis der enteralen Ernährung , 2003 .

[14]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 1983 .

[15]  L. Rabeneck,et al.  Ethically justified, clinically comprehensive guidelines for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement , 1997, The Lancet.

[16]  Martin L. Smith,et al.  To Feed or Not to Feed , 1995 .

[17]  E. Aulbert,et al.  Die Lebensqualität des chronisch Krebskranken , 1990 .

[18]  P. Rampal,et al.  Quality of life in long-term home enteral nutrition patients. , 2000, Clinical nutrition.

[19]  Colin M. MacLeod,et al.  Evaluation of chemotherapeutic agents , 1949 .

[20]  Y. Kim,et al.  To feed or not to feed: tube feeding in patients with advanced dementia. , 2009 .

[21]  D. Osoba,et al.  The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. , 1993, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[22]  U. Fölsch,et al.  Enteral Long-Term Nutrition via Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) in 210 Patients A Four-Year Prospective Study , 1998, Digestive Diseases and Sciences.

[23]  D. Karnofsky The clinical evaluation of chemotherapeutic agents in cancer , 1949 .

[24]  Andrew Bottomley,et al.  EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual , 1995 .

[25]  D. Amadori,et al.  Guidelines on artificial nutrition versus hydration in terminal cancer patients. European Association for Palliative Care. , 1996, Nutrition.

[26]  A. Dobson,et al.  Measuring the quality of life of cancer patients: a concise QL-index for use by physicians. , 1981, Journal of chronic diseases.

[27]  J. Weaver,et al.  Evaluation of the benefits of gastric tube feeding in an elderly population. , 1993, Archives of family medicine.

[28]  F. Joly,et al.  Quality of life and home enteral tube feeding: a French prospective study in patients with head and neck or oesophageal cancer , 2000, British Journal of Cancer.

[29]  L. Gerson,et al.  Predictive factors for early mortality after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. , 1995, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[30]  J. Williams,et al.  Impact of psychotherapeutic support on gastrointestinal cancer patients undergoing surgery: survival results of a trial. , 1999, Hepato-gastroenterology.

[31]  H. Fukuda,et al.  European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) and International Society for Cutaneous Lymphoma (ISCL) consensus recommendations for the management of cutaneous B-cell lymphomas Blood 2008; 112(5):1600-9 , 2022 .