Understanding public response to a congestion charge : a random-effects ordered logit approach

Public acceptance is consistently listed as having an enormous impact on the implementation and success of a congestion charge scheme. This paper investigates public acceptance of such a scheme in Australia. Surveys were conducted in Brisbane and Melbourne, the two fastest growing Australian cities. Using an ordered logit modeling approach, the survey data including stated preferences were analyzed to pinpoint the important factors influencing people’s attitudes to a congestion charge and, in turn, to their transport mode choices. To accommodate the nature of, and to account for the resulting heterogeneity of the panel data, random effects were considered in the models. As expected, this study found that the amount of the congestion charge and the financial benefits of implementing it have a significant influence on respondents’ support for the charge and on the likelihood of their taking a bus to city areas. However, respondents’ current primary transport mode for travelling to the city areas has a more pronounced impact. Meanwhile, respondents’ perceptions of the congestion charge’s role in protecting the environment by reducing vehicle emissions, and of the extent to which the charge would mean that they travelled less frequently to the city for shopping or entertainment, also have a significant impact on their level of support for its implementation. We also found and explained notable differences across two cities. Finally, findings from this study have been fully discussed in relation to the literature.

[1]  J. Evans The London congestion charging scheme , 2003 .

[2]  S. Fujii,et al.  Attitudes towards road pricing and environmental taxation among US and UK students , 2013 .

[3]  Ralf Becker,et al.  WILLINGNESS TO SUPPORT TRAFFIC POLICY MEASURES: THE ROLE OF JUSTICE. IN: ACCEPTABILITY OF TRANSPORT PRICING STRATEGIES , 2003 .

[4]  J. Anable,et al.  Scientific research about climate change mitigation in transport: a critical review , 2011 .

[5]  Mark Wardman,et al.  Public acceptability of personal carbon trading and carbon tax , 2010 .

[6]  Davide Fiorello,et al.  DIFFERENT user reaction and efficient differentiationof charges and tolls - Report onImpacts of charge differentiation for HGV andmotorway toll differentiation to combat time spacecongestion. Deliverable D8.3-9.2 , 2008 .

[7]  T. Sterner,et al.  Policy Instruments for Environmental and Natural Resource Management , 2002 .

[8]  J. Hintze,et al.  Violin plots : A box plot-density trace synergism , 1998 .

[9]  G Tertoolen,et al.  FREE TO MOVE...?! PSYCHOLOGICAL RESISTANCE AGAINST ATTEMPTS TO REDUCE PRIVATE CAR USE , 1998 .

[10]  Rune Haubo,et al.  Analysis of ordinal data with cumulative link models — estimation with the R-package ordinal , 2011 .

[11]  Björn Hårsman,et al.  Political and Public Acceptability of Congestion Pricing: Ideology and Self Interest , 2009 .

[12]  D. Hensher,et al.  Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications , 2000 .

[13]  T. Litman London Congestion Pricing – Implications for Other Cities , 2005 .

[14]  Alan Krupnick,et al.  Designing Climate Mitigation Policy , 2009 .

[15]  Zuduo Zheng,et al.  Public Acceptance towards Congestion Charge: A Case Study of Brisbane , 2013 .

[16]  André de Palma,et al.  The Welfare Effects Of Congestion Tolls With Heterogeneous Commuters , 1993 .

[17]  David A. Hensher,et al.  Development of Commuter and Non-Commuter Mode Choice Models for the Assessment of New Public Transport Infrastructure Projects: A Case Study , 2007 .

[18]  Cecilia Jakobsson,et al.  A cross-country study of fairness and infringement on freedom as determinants of car owners' acceptance of road pricing , 2004 .

[19]  Kenneth Button,et al.  Road pricing, traffic congestion and the environment : issues of efficiency and social feasibility , 1998 .

[20]  Jonathan Baron,et al.  Norms against voting for coerced reform , 1993 .

[21]  D J Clowes LONDON CONGESTION CHARGING SCHEME , 2003 .

[22]  Ed Pike,et al.  Congestion Charging: Challenges and Opportunities , 2010 .

[23]  Kenneth Train,et al.  The Navigation Economic Technologies Program Monte Carlo Analysis of Sp-off-rp Data Navigation · Economics · Technologies Navigation Economic Technologies Expanding the Body of Knowledge Creating a Planning Toolbox Analysis of Sp-off-rp Data Monte Carlo Analysis of Sp-off-rp Data * , 2007 .

[24]  Paul J. Ferraro,et al.  Heterogeneous treatment effects and mechanisms in information-based environmental policies: Evidence from a large-scale field experiment , 2013 .

[25]  Angela Francke,et al.  Responses to differentiated road pricing schemes , 2013 .

[26]  W. Greene,et al.  Modeling Ordered Choices: A Primer , 2010 .

[27]  Linda Steg,et al.  FACTORS INFLUENCING THE ACCEPTABILITY AND EFFECTIVENESS OF TRANSPORT PRICING. IN: ACCEPTABILITY OF TRANSPORT PRICING STRATEGIES , 2003 .

[28]  David A. Hensher,et al.  IDENTIFYING THE INFLUENCE OF STATED CHOICE DESIGN DIMENSIONALITY ON WILLINGNESS TO PAY FOR TRAVEL TIME SAVINGS , 2004 .

[29]  Qiang Meng,et al.  Impact analysis of cordon-based congestion pricing on mode-split for a bimodal transportation network , 2012 .

[30]  Peter Loukopoulos,et al.  Acceptability of Road Pricing , 2008 .

[31]  Peter Bonsall,et al.  DIFFERENT user reaction and efficient DIFFERENTiation of charges and tolls - psychological constraints of user reactions towards Differentiated charging; evaluation and recommendations Deliverable D4.2 , 2008 .

[32]  John M. Rose,et al.  Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer , 2005 .

[33]  J. Cunningham History , 2007, The Journal of Hellenic Studies.

[34]  J. Schade,et al.  Acceptability of Transport Pricing Strategies , 2003 .

[35]  John M. Rose,et al.  Identifying commuter preferences for existing modes and a proposed Metro in Sydney, Australia with special reference to crowding , 2011, Public Transp..

[36]  Jonathan Leape The London Congestion Charge , 2006 .

[37]  Peter Bonsall,et al.  Factors affecting the amount of effort expended in responding to questions in behavioural choice experiments , 2009 .

[38]  M. Rokeach The Nature Of Human Values , 1974 .

[39]  J. Elíasson,et al.  The Stockholm congestion – charging trial 2006: Overview of effects ☆ , 2009 .

[40]  Davide Fiorello,et al.  Impacts of Charge Differentiation for HGV and Motorway Toll Differentiation to Combat Time Space Congestion , 2008 .

[41]  Soyoung Ahn,et al.  Impact of traffic oscillations on freeway crash occurrences. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[42]  J. T. Berg,et al.  Lessons Learned from International Experience in Congestion Pricing , 2008 .

[43]  Tom Rye,et al.  Public Acceptability of Road User Charging: The Case of Edinburgh and the 2005 Referendum , 2007 .

[44]  Kenneth A. Small,et al.  Road Pricing for Congestion Management: The Transition from Theory to Policy - eScholarship , 1998 .

[45]  D. Xenias,et al.  Dimensions and determinants of expert and public attitudes to sustainable transport policies and technologies , 2013 .

[46]  H W Richardson,et al.  A NOTE ON THE DISTRIBUTIONAL EFFECTS OF ROAD PRICING REMEDIAL TREATMENT (MERPS) , 1974 .

[47]  Jian Wang,et al.  Development and Inspiration of Road Congestion Pricing Revenue Redistribution Theory Research , 2010 .

[48]  Edward Chung,et al.  PUBLIC ACCEPTANCE AND TECHNOLOGIES FOR ROAD PRICING , 1997 .

[49]  Brendan Bartley,et al.  Mobility impacts, reactions and opinions : traffic demand management options in Europe : the MIRO Project , 1995 .

[50]  Neil Thorpe,et al.  PUBLIC ATTITUDES TO TDM MEASURES: A COMPARATIVE STUDY , 2000 .

[51]  Haijun Huang,et al.  Mathematical and Economic Theory of Road Pricing , 2005 .

[52]  Satoshi Fujii,et al.  Comparative Analysis of Proximal and Distal Determinants for the Acceptance of Coercive Charging Policies in the UK and Japan , 2012 .

[53]  P. McCullagh Analysis of Ordinal Categorical Data , 1985 .

[54]  L. Steg,et al.  Explaining differences in acceptability before and acceptance after the implementation of a congestion charge in Stockholm , 2010 .

[55]  Edward Chung,et al.  The Brisbane Cordon scheme : part B - investigation into feasibility and effects , 2011 .

[56]  Christiane Beuermann,et al.  Social and political responses to ecological tax reform in Europe: an introduction to the special issue , 2006 .

[57]  S. Jaensirisak,et al.  Explaining Variations in Public Acceptability of Road Pricing Schemes , 2005 .

[58]  M G Richards,et al.  CONGESTION CHARGING FOR LONDON , 1994 .

[59]  Satoshi Fujii,et al.  A condition of development of trust toward public administration , 2005 .

[60]  Ken Livingstone,et al.  The challenge of driving through change: Introducing congestion charging in central London , 2004 .

[61]  J. Brehm A theory of psychological reactance. , 1981 .

[62]  Edward Chung,et al.  The Brisbane Cordon scheme : part A - preliminary investigation , 2011 .

[63]  Konstantina Gkritza,et al.  Urban Road Pricing: Modeling Public Acceptance , 2011 .

[64]  B. Schaller New York City's Congestion Pricing Experience and Implications for Road Pricing Acceptance in the United States , 2010 .

[65]  Peter Jones,et al.  Acceptability of Road User Charging: Meeting the Challenge , 2003 .

[66]  J. Schade,et al.  PUBLIC ACCEPTABILITY OF TRAFFIC DEMAND MANAGEMENT IN EUROPE , 2000 .

[67]  T. D. Hau Developments in transport policy - electronic road pricing - developments in Hong Kong 1983-1989 , 1990 .

[68]  J. Elíasson,et al.  Equity effects of congestion pricing: Quantitative methodology and a case study for Stockholm , 2006 .

[69]  Qiang Meng,et al.  Speed-based toll design for cordon-based congestion pricing scheme , 2013 .

[70]  David Banister,et al.  Critical pragmatism and congestion charging in London , 2003 .

[71]  T. Gärling,et al.  Determinants of private car users' acceptance of road pricing , 2000 .

[72]  J. Elíasson A cost–benefit analysis of the Stockholm congestion charging system , 2009 .

[73]  M. Richards,et al.  Congestion Charging in London: The Policy and the Politics , 2005 .

[74]  D. Hensher,et al.  Referendum voting in road pricing reform: A review of the evidence , 2013 .