Solving Conflicting Beliefs with a Distributed Belief Revision Approach

The ability to solve conflicting beliefs is crucial for multiagent systems where the information is dynamic, incomplete and distributed over a group of autonomous agents. The proposed distributed belief revision approach consists of a distributed truth maintenance system and a set of autonomous belief revision methodologies. The agents have partial views and, frequently, hold disparate beliefs which are automatically detected by system's reason maintenance mechanism. The nature of these conflicts is dynamic and requires adequate methodologies for conflict resolution. The two types of conflicting beliefs addressed in this paper are Context Dependent and Context Independent Conflicts which result, in the first case, from the assignment, by different agents, of opposite belief statuses to the same belief, and, in the latter case, from holding contradictory distinct beliefs. The belief revision methodology for solving Context Independent Conflicts is, basically, a selection process based on the assessment of the credibility of the opposing belief statuses. The belief revision methodology for solving Context Dependent Conflicts is, essentially, a search process for a consensual alternative based on a "next best" relaxation strategy.

[1]  Julia Rose Galliers Belief Revision: Autonomous belief revision and communication , 1992 .

[2]  Aldo Franco Dragoni,et al.  Distributed belief revision versus distributed truth maintenance , 1994, Proceedings Sixth International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence. TAI 94.

[3]  Peter Gärdenfors,et al.  Belief Revision , 1995 .

[4]  Gerard Vreeswijk,et al.  Abstract Argumentation Systems , 1997, Artif. Intell..

[5]  Paul R. Cohen,et al.  Heuristic Reasoning About Uncertainty , 1983 .

[6]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Agents That Reason and Negotiate by Arguing , 1998, J. Log. Comput..

[7]  Thies Wittig,et al.  ARCHON: an architecture for multi-agent systems , 1992 .

[8]  J. Dekleer An assumption-based TMS , 1986 .

[9]  Johan de Kleer,et al.  An Assumption-Based TMS , 1987, Artif. Intell..

[10]  Benedita Malheiro,et al.  Consistency and Context Management in a Multi-Agent Belief Revision Testbed , 1995, ATAL.

[11]  Aldo Franco Dragoni,et al.  Belief Revision Through the Belief-Function Formalism in a Multi-Agent Environment , 1996, ATAL.

[12]  Katia Sycara,et al.  Persuasive argumentation in negotiation , 1990 .

[13]  Ana Paula Rocha,et al.  Negotiation and conflict resolution within a community of cooperative agents , 1993, Proceedings ISAD 93: International Symposium on Autonomous Decentralized Systems.

[14]  Munindar P. Singh Book review: ARCHON: An Architecture for Multi-agent Systems. Edited by Wittig, Thies (Ellis Horwood Limited (distributed by Prentice Hall), 1992) , 1996, SGAR.

[15]  Benedita Malheiro,et al.  Environmental decision support: a multi-agent approach , 1997, AGENTS '97.