Flexible Interconnection of Graph Transformation Modules A Systematic Approach

Modularization is a well-known concept to structure software systems as well as their specifications. Modules are equipped with export and import interfaces and thus can be connected with other modules requesting or providing certain features. In this paper, we study modules the interfaces of which consist of behav- ioral specifications given by typed graph transformation systems. We in- troduce a framework for classifying and systematically defining relations between typed graph transformation systems. The framework comprises a number of standard ingredients, like homomorphisms between type graphs and mappings between sets of graph transformation rules. The framework is applied to develop a novel concept of substitution morphism by separating preconditions and effects in the specification of rules. This substitution morphism is suited to define the semantic rela- tion between export and import interfaces of requesting and providing modules.

[1]  Hartmut Ehrig,et al.  Pragmatic and Semantic Aspects of a Module Concept for Graph Transformation Systems , 1994, TAGT.

[2]  Reiko Heckel,et al.  Classification and comparison of module concepts for graph transformation systems , 1999 .

[3]  簡聰富,et al.  物件導向軟體之架構(Object-Oriented Software Construction)探討 , 1989 .

[4]  Reiko Heckel,et al.  Model-based discovery of Web services , 2004, Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Web Services, 2004..

[5]  Francesco Parisi-Presicce,et al.  Spatial and Temporal Refinement of Typed Graph Transformation Systems , 1998, MFCS.

[6]  G.,et al.  Classification and Comparison of Module Concepts for Graph Transformation Systems , 1999 .

[7]  Reiko Heckel,et al.  A view-based approach to system modeling based on open graph transformation systems , 1999 .

[8]  Francesca Rossi,et al.  Graph Processes , 1996, Fundam. Informaticae.

[9]  Francesco Parisi-Presicce,et al.  Refinements of Graph Transformation Systems via Rule Expressions , 1998, TAGT.

[10]  Reiko Heckel,et al.  Specification Matching of Web Services Using Conditional Graph Transformation Rules , 2004, ICGT.

[11]  Editors , 1986, Brain Research Bulletin.

[12]  Hans-Jörg Kreowski,et al.  On the Interleaving Sematics of Transformation Units - A Step into GRACE , 1994, TAGT.

[13]  Francesco Parisi-Presicce,et al.  Refinements and Modules for Typed Graph Transformation Systems , 1998, WADT.

[14]  Reiko Heckel,et al.  Open graph transformation systems: a new approach to the compositional modelling of concurrent and reactive systems , 1998 .

[15]  Reiko Heckel,et al.  Flexible Interconnection of Graph Transformation Modules , 2005, Formal Methods in Software and Systems Modeling.

[16]  Hartmut Ehrig,et al.  Handbook of graph grammars and computing by graph transformation: vol. 2: applications, languages, and tools , 1999 .

[17]  Reiko Heckel,et al.  Algebraic Approaches to Graph Transformation - Part I: Basic Concepts and Double Pushout Approach , 1997, Handbook of Graph Grammars.

[18]  Andy Schürr,et al.  UML Packages for PROgrammed Graph REwriting Systems , 1998, TAGT.

[19]  Jeannette M. Wing,et al.  Specification matching of software components , 1995, TSEM.

[20]  Leila Ribeiro,et al.  Parallel composition and unfolding semantics of graph grammars , 1996 .

[21]  Reiko Heckel,et al.  Horizontal and vertical structuring of typed graph transformation systems , 1996, Mathematical Structures in Computer Science.

[22]  Hartmut Ehrig,et al.  Graph-Grammars: An Algebraic Approach , 1973, SWAT.

[23]  Hartmut Ehrig,et al.  Fundamentals of Algebraic Specification 2: Module Specifications and Constraints , 1990 .

[24]  Jeannette M. Wing,et al.  Signature matching: a tool for using software libraries , 1995, TSEM.

[25]  Reiko Heckel,et al.  Double-Pullback Transitions and Coalgebraic Loose Semantics for Graph Transformation Systems , 2001, Appl. Categorical Struct..

[26]  Reiko Heckel,et al.  Graph Grammars with Negative Application Conditions , 1996, Fundam. Informaticae.