A simultaneous successive linear estimator and a guide for hydraulic tomography analysis

[1] In this study, a geostatistically based estimator is developed that simultaneously includes all observed transient hydrographs from hydraulic tomography to map aquifer heterogeneity. To analyze tomography data, a data preprocessing procedure (including diagnosing and wavelet denoising analysis) is recommended. A least squares approach is then introduced to estimate effective parameters and spatial statistics of heterogeneity that are the required inputs for the geostatistical estimator. Since wavelet denoising does not completely remove noise from observed hydrographs, a stopping criterion is established to avoid overexploitation of the imperfect hydrographs. The estimator and the procedures are then tested in a synthetic, cross-sectional aquifer with hierarchical heterogeneity and a vertical sandbox with prearranged heterogeneity. Results of the test indicate that with this estimator and preprocessing procedures, hydraulic tomography can effectively map hierarchical heterogeneity in the synthetic aquifer as well as in the sandbox. In addition, the study shows that using the estimated hydraulic conductivity and specific storage fields of the sandbox, the classic groundwater flow model accurately predicts temporal and spatial distributions of drawdown induced by an independent pumping event in the sandbox. On the other hand, the classic groundwater flow model yields less satisfactory results when equivalent homogeneous properties of the sandbox are used.

[1]  Allan L. Gutjahr,et al.  Stochastic analysis of spatial variability in subsurface flows: 1. Comparison of one‐ and three‐dimensional flows , 1978 .

[2]  P. Kitanidis Quasi‐Linear Geostatistical Theory for Inversing , 1995 .

[3]  T. Harter,et al.  A Numerical Model for Water Flow and Chemical Transport in Variably Saturated Porous Media , 1993 .

[4]  T. Yeh,et al.  Hydraulic tomography: Development of a new aquifer test method , 2000 .

[5]  Alex Hagen,et al.  Fuzzy set approach to assessing similarity of categorical maps , 2003, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[6]  Walter A. Illman,et al.  Steady-state hydraulic tomography in a laboratory aquifer with deterministic heterogeneity: Multi-method and multiscale validation of hydraulic conductivity tomograms , 2007 .

[7]  Tian-Chyi J. Yeh,et al.  Characterization of aquifer heterogeneity using transient hydraulic tomography , 2004 .

[8]  Shuyun Liu,et al.  Effectiveness of hydraulic tomography: Sandbox experiments , 2001 .

[9]  K. Karasaki,et al.  Estimation of reservoir properties using transient pressure data: An asymptotic approach , 2000 .

[10]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical Recipes in Fortran 77 , 1992 .

[11]  James J. Butler,et al.  Steady shape analysis of tomographic pumping tests for characterization of aquifer heterogeneities , 2002 .

[12]  Velimir V. Vesselinov,et al.  Three‐dimensional numerical inversion of pneumatic cross‐hole tests in unsaturated fractured tuff: 1. Methodology and borehole effects , 2001 .

[13]  Keiji Kojima,et al.  Hydropulse Tomography for Identifying 3-D Permeability Distribution , 1993 .

[14]  Walter A Illman,et al.  Practical Issues in Imaging Hydraulic Conductivity through Hydraulic Tomography , 2008, Ground water.

[15]  Junfeng Zhu,et al.  Traditional analysis of aquifer tests: Comparing apples to oranges? , 2005 .

[16]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical Recipes: FORTRAN , 1988 .

[17]  Junfeng Zhu,et al.  Laboratory sandbox validation of transient hydraulic tomography , 2007 .

[18]  Geoffrey C. Bohling,et al.  A field assessment of the value of steady shape hydraulic tomography for characterization of aquifer heterogeneities , 2007 .

[19]  W. Li,et al.  Two‐dimensional characterization of hydraulic heterogeneity by multiple pumping tests , 2007 .

[20]  Peter Dietrich,et al.  A travel time based hydraulic tomographic approach , 2003 .

[21]  Peter Dietrich,et al.  Identification of the permeability distribution in soil by hydraulic tomography , 1995 .

[22]  Ming Ye,et al.  Stochastic analysis of moisture plume dynamics of a field injection experiment , 2004 .

[23]  P. Choi,et al.  Denoising of gamma-ray signals by interval-dependent thresholds of wavelet analysis , 2006 .

[24]  Junfeng Zhu,et al.  Sequential aquifer tests at a well field, Montalto Uffugo Scalo, Italy , 2007 .

[25]  S. Mallat A wavelet tour of signal processing , 1998 .

[26]  Wei Li,et al.  Three‐Dimensional Geostatistical Inversion of Flowmeter and Pumping Test Data , 2008, Ground water.

[27]  T. Yeh,et al.  Analysis of hydraulic tomography using temporal moments of drawdown recovery data , 2006 .

[28]  W. Barrash,et al.  Hierarchical geostatistics and multifacies systems: Boise Hydrogeophysical Research Site, Boise, Idaho , 2002 .

[29]  Peter K. Kitanidis,et al.  An interactive Bayesian geostatistical inverse protocol for hydraulic tomography , 2006 .

[30]  Minghui Jin,et al.  AN ITERATIVE STOCHASTIC INVERSE METHOD: CONDITIONAL EFFECTIVE TRANSMISSIVITY AND HYDRAULIC HEAD FIELDS , 1995 .

[31]  Kristopher L. Kuhlman,et al.  Basin‐Scale Transmissivity and Storativity Estimation Using Hydraulic Tomography , 2008, Ground water.