Evaluating Smart Living Technology Strategies Using the Analytic Network Process

Smart living technology (SLT) is one of the most crucial information and communication technology application concerns for government and businesses. Many governments have initiated projects to promote SLT, but the evaluation models for these technologies are deficient and lack proper evaluation guidelines. This paper proposes an analytic network process for evaluating and selecting SLT strategies. It objectively identifies the related policy criteria and prioritizes the alternatives critical to the success of SLT promotion. To demonstrate the validity of this method, Taiwan’s Intelligent Taiwan program is used as an illustrative case. The methodology and experience presented in this study could serve as a reference for policymakers making SLT-related decisions.

[1]  Petri Pulli,et al.  Towards High Quality Mobile Services for Senior Citizens in Smart Living Environments , 2007, 2007 International Conference on Multimedia and Ubiquitous Engineering (MUE'07).

[2]  Chih-Kung Lee,et al.  Taiwan Perspective: Developing Smart Living Technology , 2011 .

[3]  F. Partovi.  An analytic model to quantify strategic service vision , 2001 .

[4]  Yongtae Park,et al.  An analytic network process approach to measuring design change impacts in modular products , 2010 .

[5]  Hans Schaffers,et al.  Smart Cities and the Future Internet: Towards Cooperation Frameworks for Open Innovation , 2011, Future Internet Assembly.

[6]  Ernest H. Forman,et al.  Group decision support with the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1992, Decis. Support Syst..

[7]  Barry Brumitt,et al.  EasyLiving: Technologies for Intelligent Environments , 2000, HUC.

[8]  Chin-Tsai Lin,et al.  A Green Purchasing Model by Using ANP and LP Methods , 2012 .

[9]  T. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .

[10]  Patrizia Lombardi,et al.  Managing the green IT agenda , 2011 .

[11]  S. Hung,et al.  Stimulating new industries from emerging technologies: challenges for the public sector , 2006 .

[12]  Chun-Yao Tseng,et al.  Technological innovation and knowledge network in Asia: Evidence from comparison of information and communication technologies among six countries , 2009 .

[13]  Sheu Hua Chen,et al.  Applying ANP approach to partner selection for strategic alliance , 2008 .

[14]  Umut Asan,et al.  Identifying strategic management concepts: An analytic network process approach , 2009, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[15]  Roy Rothwell,et al.  The role of small firms in the emergence of new technologies , 1984 .

[16]  Luke Georghiou,et al.  Evaluating the demand side: New challenges for evaluation , 2012 .

[17]  Nasrin Asgari,et al.  Multiple criteria facility location problems: A survey , 2010 .

[18]  Patrizia Lombardi,et al.  New challenges in the evaluation of Smart Cities , 2011 .

[19]  Mehpare Timor,et al.  The analytic hierarchy process and analytic network process: an overview of applications , 2010 .

[20]  H. Etzkowitz,et al.  Triple Helix twins: innovation and sustainability , 2006 .

[21]  Silvia Giordano,et al.  An Analytic Network Model for Smart Cities , 2011 .

[22]  Yu-Tso Chen,et al.  Sketch Industry Promotion Framework for Smart Living Services by Leveraging Living Lab Harmonization Cube , 2012, Int. J. Electron. Bus. Manag..

[23]  M. R. Mitchell,et al.  Evaluating the Optimal City in South China for New Medical Facilities: The Application Modified Porter’s Diamond Framework , 2010 .

[24]  Silvia Giordano,et al.  Modelling the smart city performance , 2012 .

[25]  Mark de Reuver,et al.  Motivation for Collective Action in the Smart Living Business Ecosystem , 2011 .

[26]  Che-Wei Chang,et al.  Constructing an Evaluation Model for Agenting Online Games , 2012 .

[27]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Decision making with dependence and feedback : the analytic network process : the organization and prioritization of complexity , 1996 .

[28]  Roy Rothwell,et al.  Industrial Innovation and Public Policy: Preparing for the 1980s and the 1990s , 1981 .

[29]  Taysheng Jeng.  Toward a Ubiquitous Smart Space Design Framework , 2009, J. Inf. Sci. Eng..

[30]  M. R. Mitchell,et al.  Developing a Project Evaluation and Testing Model to Assess Stable Photovoltaic Slicing Machine , 2009 .

[31]  Ahti Salo,et al.  Rationales for Government Intervention in the Commercialization of New Technologies , 2002, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..