Influence of detachment mechanisms on competition in biofilms

Abstract Organism distribution in and morphology of biofilms are determined by supply of substrate and oxygen and by detachment mechanisms. Based on mathematical simulations, competition of autotrophic and heterotrophic biomass in a biofilm is discussed for three cases: (1) constant biofilm thickness, (2) daily backwashing of the biofilm support media and (3) sloughing events in weekly intervals. It is shown that the different detachment patterns have a significant influence on the organism distribution within the biofilm and on overall process performance. Faster growing heterotrophs are favored over autotrophic biomass in situations with long intervals between detachment with resulting high variations of the biofilm thickness. It is concluded that the application of results from mathematical models assuming a constant biofilm thickness may be misleading when predicting the performance of systems with large fluctuations of the biofilm thickness over time (e.g. biofilters with backwashing or trickling filters). Thus, it must also be questioned whether results from laboratory experiments in laminar flow channels (with a constant erosion) can be used to describe structure and function of biofilms in full-scale biofilm reactors with large time dependent fluctuations of the biofilm thickness.

[1]  Peter A. Wilderer,et al.  Structure and function of biofilms. , 1989 .

[2]  W. Gujer,et al.  Significance of Spatial Distribution of Microbial Species in Mixed Culture Biofilms , 1991 .

[3]  B. Rittman,et al.  The effect of shear stress on biofilm loss rate. , 1982, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[4]  P. Wilderer,et al.  Controlled biomass removal : The key parameter to achieve enhanced biological phosphorus removal in biofilm systems , 1999 .

[5]  P Reichert,et al.  Mathematical modeling of mixed‐culture biofilms , 1996, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[6]  Willi Gujer,et al.  Competition in Biofilms , 1985 .

[7]  William G. Characklis,et al.  Dynamics of biofilm processes , 1982 .

[8]  R Kreikenbohm,et al.  Application of a two‐compartment model to the wall growth of Pelobacter acidigallici under continuous culture conditions , 1985, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[9]  Robert L. Street,et al.  Numerical Simulation of Mixed-Culture Biofilm , 1984 .

[10]  B. Peyton,et al.  A statistical analysis of the effect of substrate utilization and shear stress on the kinetics of biofilm detachment , 1993, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[11]  D. Stahl,et al.  Influence of substrate C/N ratio on the structure of multi-species biofilms consisting of nitrifiers and heterotrophs , 1995 .

[12]  W Gujer,et al.  A multispecies biofilm model , 1986, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[13]  B. Rittmann,et al.  Evaluation of multiple-species biofilm and floc processes using a simplified aggregate model , 1994 .

[14]  B. Rittmann,et al.  Mathematical modeling of biofilm on activated carbon. , 1987, Environmental science & technology.

[15]  Gerald E. Speitel,et al.  Biofilm Shearing under Dynamic Conditions , 1987 .

[16]  C. Breitholtz,et al.  Steady‐state solution of a two‐species biofilm problem , 1996, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[17]  Tian C. Zhang,et al.  Competition in biofilms , 1994 .

[18]  W. G. Characklis,et al.  Activity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in biofilms: Steady state , 1984, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[19]  J. Bryers,et al.  Biofilm formation and chemostat dynamics: Pure and mixed culture considerations , 1984, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[20]  P. Stewart,et al.  A model of biofilm detachment , 1993, Biotechnology and bioengineering.