How well do deep neural networks trained on object recognition characterize the mouse visual system

Recent work on modeling neural responses in the primate visual system has benefited from deep neural networks trained on large-scale object recognition, and found a hierarchical correspondence between layers of the artificial neural network and brain areas along the ventral visual stream. However, we neither know whether such task-optimized networks enable equally good models of the rodent visual system, nor if a similar hierarchical correspondence exists. Here, we address these questions in the mouse visual system by extracting features at several layers of a convolutional neural network (CNN) trained on ImageNet to predict the responses of thousands of neurons in four visual areas (V1, LM, AL, RL) to natural images. We found that the CNN features outperform classical subunit energy models, but found no evidence for an order of the areas we recorded via a correspondence to the hierarchy of CNN layers. Moreover, the same CNN but with random weights provided an equivalently useful feature space for predicting neural responses. Our results suggest that object recognition as a high-level task does not provide more discriminative features to characterize the mouse visual system than a random network. Unlike in the primate, training on ethologically relevant visually guided behaviors – beyond static object recognition – may be needed to unveil the functional organization of the mouse visual cortex.

[1]  Giulio Matteucci,et al.  Nonlinear processing of shape information in rat lateral extrastriate cortex , 2018 .

[2]  Daniel L. K. Yamins,et al.  A Task-Optimized Neural Network Replicates Human Auditory Behavior, Predicts Brain Responses, and Reveals a Cortical Processing Hierarchy , 2018, Neuron.

[3]  Giulio Matteucci,et al.  Nonlinear Processing of Shape Information in Rat Lateral Extrastriate Cortex , 2018, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  James J. DiCarlo,et al.  How Does the Brain Solve Visual Object Recognition? , 2012, Neuron.

[5]  David D. Cox,et al.  Opinion TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences Vol.11 No.8 Untangling invariant object recognition , 2022 .

[6]  Marcel A. J. van Gerven,et al.  Deep Neural Networks Reveal a Gradient in the Complexity of Neural Representations across the Ventral Stream , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  Andrew Zisserman,et al.  Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition , 2014, ICLR.

[8]  Benjamin Recht,et al.  Random Features for Large-Scale Kernel Machines , 2007, NIPS.

[9]  Leon A. Gatys,et al.  Deep convolutional models improve predictions of macaque V1 responses to natural images , 2019, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[10]  Christof Koch,et al.  A large-scale, standardized physiological survey reveals higher order coding throughout the mouse visual cortex , 2018, bioRxiv.

[11]  Alexander S. Ecker,et al.  Stimulus domain transfer in recurrent models for large scale cortical population prediction on video , 2018, NeurIPS.

[12]  J. DiCarlo,et al.  Using goal-driven deep learning models to understand sensory cortex , 2016, Nature Neuroscience.

[13]  C. Niell,et al.  Vision Drives Accurate Approach Behavior during Prey Capture in Laboratory Mice , 2016, Current Biology.

[14]  James J DiCarlo,et al.  A rodent model for the study of invariant visual object recognition , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  Ha Hong,et al.  Performance-optimized hierarchical models predict neural responses in higher visual cortex , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  Stefano Panzeri,et al.  Emergence of transformation-tolerant representations of visual objects in rat lateral extrastriate cortex , 2017, eLife.

[17]  Alexander S. Ecker,et al.  Inception in visual cortex: in vivo-silico loops reveal most exciting images , 2018 .

[18]  Emmanouil Froudarakis,et al.  The Visual Cortex in Context. , 2019, Annual review of vision science.