“IT'S GETTING CRAZY OUT THERE”: CAN A CIVIL GANG INJUNCTION CHANGE A COMMUNITY?†

Research Summary: Civil gang injunctions are an increasingly popular gang suppression tactic. This article reports on the first scientific evaluation of the community impact of this strategy. San Bernardino residents in five neighborhoods were surveyed about their perceptions and experience of crime, gang activity, and neighborhood quality 18 months before and 6 months after the issuance of an injunction. Analyses indicated positive evidence of short-term effects in the disordered, primary injunction area, including less gang presence, fewer reports of gang intimidation, and less fear of confrontation with gang members, but no significant changes in intermediate or long-term outcomes except lower fear of crime. Comparison of this injunction area with a previous one suggested that improvements in neighborhood dynamics might accrue over the long term. Negative effects were observed in the secondary, less disordered injunction area. Policy Implications: This study suggests that the strategic suppression of gang member activities may translate into modest immediate improvements in community safety and well-being. Furthermore, the findings suggest that law enforcement use caution regarding the size of an injunction area and the type of gang targeted by the tactic. Coupling an injunction with efforts to improve neighborhood social organization and provide positive alternatives for gang members might substantially improve its effectiveness. KEYWORDS: Juvenile justice Language: en

[1]  K. Hennigan,et al.  Community views on crime and policing: Survey mode effects on bias in community surveys , 2002 .

[2]  Scott H. Decker,et al.  Policing gangs and youth violence , 2002 .

[3]  Jody Miller,et al.  The Modern Gang Reader , 1995 .

[4]  I. Spergel,et al.  : Neighborhoods and Crime: The Dimensions of Effective Community Control , 1994 .

[5]  Jeffrey T. Grogger,et al.  The Effects of Civil Gang Injunctions on Reported Violent Crime: Evidence from Los Angeles County* , 2002, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[6]  Jean Marie McGloin,et al.  POLICY AND INTERVENTION CONSIDERATIONS OF A NETWORK ANALYSIS OF STREET GANGS , 2005 .

[7]  C. Huff,et al.  Gangs in America , 1990 .

[8]  Alan J. Lizotte,et al.  Gangs and Delinquency in Developmental Perspective , 2002 .

[9]  T. Postmes,et al.  Deindividuation and antinormative behavior: A meta-analysis. , 1998 .

[10]  M. Fleisher Doing Field Research on Diverse Gangs: Interpreting Youth Gangs as Social Networks , 2002 .

[11]  Charles M. Katz,et al.  THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A POLICE GANG UNIT: AN EXAMINATION OF ORGANIZATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS* , 2001 .

[12]  A. Piehl,et al.  Problem-Oriented Policing, Deterrence, and Youth Violence: An Evaluation of Boston's Operation Ceasefire , 2001 .

[13]  Martín Sánchez-Jankowski,et al.  Islands in the Street: Gangs and American Urban Society , 1991 .

[14]  Gary Stewart Black Codes and Broken Windows: The Legacy of Racial Hegemony in Anti-Gang Civil Injunctions , 1998 .

[15]  Bertjan Doosje,et al.  Self and social identity. , 2002, Annual review of psychology.

[16]  K. Weick Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method. , 1978 .

[17]  D. W. Roncek,et al.  The creation of specialized police gang units: A macro‐level analysis of contingency, social threat and resource dependency explanations , 2002 .

[18]  Joseph P. Forgas,et al.  Social Influence: Direct and Indirect Processes , 2001 .

[19]  D. Kennedy Pulling Levers: Getting Deterrence Right , 1998 .

[20]  B. Bjerregaard Antigang Legislation and its Potential Impact: The Promises and the Pitfalls , 2003 .

[21]  M. W. Klein,et al.  The American Street Gang: Its Nature, Prevalence, and Control.@@@The Youth Gang Problem: A Community Approach. , 1996 .

[22]  Scott H. Decker,et al.  Life in the Gang: Family, Friends, and Violence , 1996 .

[23]  D. Dillman The Design and Administration of Mail Surveys , 1991 .

[24]  S. Raudenbush,et al.  Neighborhoods and violent crime: a multilevel study of collective efficacy. , 1997, Science.

[25]  Lawrence W. Sherman,et al.  Neighborhoods and Crime: The Dimensions of Effective Community Control , 2002 .

[26]  T. T. Postmes,et al.  A SIDE View of Social Influence , 2001 .