On the metrology of interparticle contacts in sand from x-ray tomography images

In the mechanics of granular materials, interparticle contacts play a major role. These have been historically difficult to study experimentally, but the advent of x-ray microtomography allows the identification of all the thousands of individual particles needed for representative mechanical testing. This paper studies the metrology of detecting interparticle contacts and measuring their orientation from such images. Using synthetic images of spheres and high-resolution tomographies of two very different granular materials (spherical and very angular) as ground truths, we find that these measurements are far from trivial. For example, if a physically correct threshold is used to separate particles from pores there is a systematic over-detection of contacts. We propose a method of improvement that is effective for non-angular particles. When contact orientations are measured from the pixels that make up the contact area, standard watershed approaches make significant systematic errors. We confirm and build upon previous results showing the improvement in orientation measurement using a refined notion of particle separation. Building on this solid basis, future work should focus on a link between contact topology and measurement error, as well as evaluating the use of local surface normals for orientation measurement.

[1]  Gioacchino Viggiani,et al.  From computed tomography to mechanics of granular materials via level set bridge , 2017 .

[2]  Alessandro Tengattini,et al.  Kalisphera: an analytical tool to reproduce the partial volume effect of spheres imaged in 3D , 2015 .

[3]  Yixiang Gan,et al.  X-ray tomography investigations of mono-sized sphere packing structures in cylindrical containers , 2017 .

[4]  N. Otsu A threshold selection method from gray level histograms , 1979 .

[5]  Masanobu Oda,et al.  STRESS-INDUCED ANISOTROPY IN GRANULAR MASSES , 1985 .

[6]  Emmanuelle Gouillart,et al.  scikit-image: image processing in Python , 2014, PeerJ.

[7]  Veerle Cnudde,et al.  High-resolution X-ray computed tomography in geosciences: A review of the current technology and applications , 2013 .

[8]  M. Schröter A local view on the role of friction and shape , 2017 .

[9]  M. Tuller,et al.  Segmentation of X‐ray computed tomography images of porous materials: A crucial step for characterization and quantitative analysis of pore structures , 2009 .

[10]  Leo Grady,et al.  Random Walks for Image Segmentation , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[11]  E. Andò Experimental investigation of microstructural changes in deforming granular media using x-ray tomography , 2013 .

[12]  R. Jiménez,et al.  Computer Tomography 3D Edge Detection Comparative for Metrology Applications , 2013 .

[13]  M. Oda INITIAL FABRICS AND THEIR RELATIONS TO MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF GRANULAR MATERIAL , 1972 .

[14]  Matthias Schröter,et al.  Analyzing X-ray tomographies of granular packings. , 2016, The Review of scientific instruments.

[15]  Hugues Talbot,et al.  Estimation of Separating Planes between Touching 3D Objects Using Power Watershed , 2013, ISMM.

[16]  Gioacchino Viggiani,et al.  Experimental micro-mechanics of granular media studied by x-ray tomography: Recent results and challenges , 2013 .

[17]  Karen E. Daniels,et al.  Preface: Focus on imaging methods in granular physics. , 2017, The Review of scientific instruments.

[18]  Karen E. Daniels,et al.  Focus on Imaging Methods in Granular Physics , 2017 .

[19]  S. Beucher Use of watersheds in contour detection , 1979 .

[20]  J. Schrooten,et al.  Validation of x-ray microfocus computed tomography as an imaging tool for porous structures. , 2008, The Review of scientific instruments.