The safety and efficacy of immunotherapy with anti-programmed cell death 1 monoclonal antibody for lung cancer complicated with Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection

Background Anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) immunotherapy has boosted the prognosis in advanced lung cancer. Meanwhile, accumulating cases showed the correlation between tuberculosis (TB) reactivation and anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy. However, the safety and efficacy of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy for lung cancer complicated with TB infection could only be learned from real-world data. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 562 patients with advanced lung cancer who received anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy at Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital from 2015 to 2019, including 13 patients with TB infection. Besides, relevant literature reviews were performed online to analyze the safety and efficacy of immunotherapy and to explore the appropriate treatment strategies in this specific population. Results In our cohort, the initiation of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy was from June 2015 to December 2019. Among them, 13 patients had TB infection prior to immunotherapy including 11 latent TB and 2 active TB, and all of them were treated with anti-PD-1 immunotherapy. Patients with active TB infection were treated with concurrent anti-TB and anti-PD-1 treatments, and the remaining received either mono-immunotherapy or combined immunotherapy. Neither reactivation of latent TB nor progression of active TB was monitored in our cohort during immunotherapy. Severe immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were diagnosed in two patients. Treatment strategies such as discontinuation of immunotherapy and administration of corticosteroids were provided timely, and one with latent TB infection got gradually improved, but the other one with active TB died quickly. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.5 months for tumor immunotherapy in our cohort. However, the PFS of immunotherapy was merely 2.1 and 2.2 months in lung cancer patients with active TB infection. Conclusions Immunotherapy is relatively safe for lung cancer patients complicated with previously treated latent TB, and the efficacy of immunotherapy in this specified population is not inferior to that in lung cancer patients without TB infection. TB screening before anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy is strongly recommended, and irAEs should be monitored more cautiously in lung cancer patients with active TB infection.

[1]  S. Gettinger,et al.  Five-Year Outcomes From the Randomized, Phase III Trials CheckMate 017 and 057: Nivolumab Versus Docetaxel in Previously Treated Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer , 2021, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  T. Kondo,et al.  Readministration of Pembrolizumab after Treatment of Tuberculosis Activated by Initial Pembrolizumab Therapy , 2020, Internal medicine.

[3]  Ying Cheng,et al.  Camrelizumab plus carboplatin and pemetrexed versus chemotherapy alone in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (CameL): a randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial. , 2020, The Lancet. Respiratory medicine.

[4]  Z. Lengyel,et al.  Tuberculosis following programmed cell death receptor-1 (PD-1) inhibitor in a patient with non-small cell lung cancer. Case report and literature review , 2020, Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy.

[5]  Ka-Wing Wong,et al.  Increased Th17 activation and gut microbiota diversity are associated with pembrolizumab-triggered tuberculosis , 2020, Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy.

[6]  V. Ninane,et al.  Severe pulmonary infections complicating nivolumab treatment for lung cancer: a report of two cases , 2020, Acta clinica Belgica.

[7]  E. Karapanagiotou,et al.  Tuberculosis associated with Triplet therapy for lung cancer , 2020, Thorax.

[8]  Chul Kim,et al.  Immune checkpoint inhibitor use and tuberculosis: a systematic review of the literature. , 2020, European journal of cancer.

[9]  Y. Yamane,et al.  Reactivation of TB during administration of durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer: a case report. , 2020, Immunotherapy.

[10]  T. Mio,et al.  Incidence of Active Tuberculosis in Lung Cancer Patients Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors , 2020, Open forum infectious diseases.

[11]  A. Leslie,et al.  Anti-PD-1 immunotherapy leads to tuberculosis reactivation via dysregulation of TNF-α , 2020, eLife.

[12]  Jeeyun Lee,et al.  Development of tuberculosis in cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors. , 2020, Respiratory medicine.

[13]  D. Zillikens,et al.  Immune checkpoint inhibitors and tuberculosis: an old disease in a new context. , 2020, The Lancet. Oncology.

[14]  Ronald Anderson,et al.  Tuberculosis Infection in a Patient Treated With Nivolumab for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Case Report and Literature Review , 2019, Front. Oncol..

[15]  M. Ahn,et al.  Five-Year Overall Survival for Patients With Advanced Non‒Small-Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Pembrolizumab: Results From the Phase I KEYNOTE-001 Study , 2019, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[16]  Satomu Morita,et al.  Paradoxical response in a patient with non-small cell lung cancer who received nivolumab followed by anti-Mycobacterium tuberculosis agents. , 2019, Journal of infection and chemotherapy : official journal of the Japan Society of Chemotherapy.

[17]  A. Tafreshi,et al.  Pembrolizumab plus Chemotherapy for Squamous Non–Small‐Cell Lung Cancer , 2018, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  D. Planchard,et al.  Overall Survival with Durvalumab after Chemoradiotherapy in Stage III NSCLC , 2018, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  Federico Cappuzzo,et al.  Atezolizumab for First‐Line Treatment of Metastatic Nonsquamous NSCLC , 2018, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  Arnaud Boyer,et al.  Durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy in stage III non-small cell lung cancer. , 2018, Journal of thoracic disease.

[21]  G. Persson,et al.  Development of pulmonary tuberculosis following treatment with anti-PD-1 for non-small cell lung cancer , 2018, Acta oncologica.

[22]  B. Besse,et al.  Infectious complications associated with the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in oncology: reactivation of tuberculosis after anti PD-1 treatment. , 2017, Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.

[23]  S. Lewin,et al.  Immune checkpoint blockade in infectious diseases , 2017, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[24]  T. Chou,et al.  Pericardial Tamponade Caused by a Hypersensitivity Response to Tuberculosis Reactivation after Anti-PD-1 Treatment in a Patient with Advanced Pulmonary Adenocarcinoma. , 2017, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[25]  Carlos Barrios,et al.  Atezolizumab versus docetaxel in patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (OAK): a phase 3, open-label, multicentre randomised controlled trial , 2017, The Lancet.

[26]  T. Mio,et al.  Anti-PD1 Antibody Treatment and the Development of Acute Pulmonary Tuberculosis. , 2016, Journal of Thoracic Oncology.

[27]  L. Sequist,et al.  Carboplatin and pemetrexed with or without pembrolizumab for advanced, non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomised, phase 2 cohort of the open-label KEYNOTE-021 study. , 2016, The Lancet. Oncology.

[28]  Y. Shentu,et al.  Pembrolizumab versus Chemotherapy for PD-L1-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[29]  Y. Shentu,et al.  Pembrolizumab versus docetaxel for previously treated, PD-L1-positive, advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (KEYNOTE-010): a randomised controlled trial , 2016, The Lancet.

[30]  L. Crinò,et al.  Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Squamous-Cell Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[31]  I. Mellman,et al.  Oncology meets immunology: the cancer-immunity cycle. , 2013, Immunity.

[32]  D. Hui,et al.  Tuberculosis is associated with increased lung cancer mortality. , 2013, The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease.

[33]  H. Morgenstern,et al.  Systematic Reviews and Meta-and Pooled Analyses Previous Lung Diseases and Lung Cancer Risk : A Pooled Analysis From the International Lung Cancer Consortium , 2012 .

[34]  Drew M. Pardoll,et al.  The blockade of immune checkpoints in cancer immunotherapy , 2012, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[35]  George Coukos,et al.  Cancer immunotherapy comes of age , 2011, Nature.

[36]  Wei-Chih Liao,et al.  Increased Lung Cancer Risk among Patients with Pulmonary Tuberculosis: A Population Cohort Study , 2011, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[37]  S. Almo,et al.  Programmed death-1 (PD-1)–deficient mice are extraordinarily sensitive to tuberculosis , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[38]  P. Guan,et al.  Facts and fiction of the relationship between preexisting tuberculosis and lung cancer risk: A systematic review , 2009, International journal of cancer.

[39]  S. Lawn,et al.  Immune reconstitution disease associated with mycobacterial infections in HIV-infected individuals receiving antiretrovirals. , 2005, The Lancet. Infectious diseases.

[40]  C. Ardies Inflammation as Cause for Scar Cancers of the Lung , 2003, Integrative cancer therapies.

[41]  Frank C. Detterbeck,et al.  The Eighth Edition Lung Cancer Stage Classification , 2017, Chest.

[42]  L. Schwartz,et al.  New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). , 2009, European journal of cancer.

[43]  I. M. Neiman,et al.  [Inflammation and cancer]. , 1974, Patologicheskaia fiziologiia i eksperimental'naia terapiia.