Unsteady Aerodynamic Force Sensing from Measured Strain

A simple approach for computing unsteady aerodynamic forces from simulated measured strain data is proposed in this study. First, the deflection and slope of the structure are computed from the unsteady strain using the two-step approach. Velocities and accelerations of the structure are computed using the autoregressive moving average model, on-line parameter estimator, low-pass filter, and a least-squares curve fitting method together with analytical derivatives with respect to time. Finally, aerodynamic forces over the wing are computed using modal aerodynamic influence coefficient matrices, a rational function approximation, and a time-marching algorithm. A cantilevered rectangular wing built and tested at the NASA Langley Research Center (Hampton, Virginia, USA) in 1959 is used to validate the simple approach. Unsteady aerodynamic forces as well as wing deflections, velocities, accelerations, and strains are computed using the CFL3D computational fluid dynamics (CFD) code and an MSC/NASTRAN code (MSC Software Corporation, Newport Beach, California, USA), and these CFL3D-based results are assumed as measured quantities. Based on the measured strains, wing deflections, velocities, accelerations, and aerodynamic forces are computed using the proposed approach. These computed deflections, velocities, accelerations, and unsteady aerodynamic forces are compared with the CFL3D/NASTRAN-based results. In general, computed aerodynamic forces based on the lifting surface theory in subsonic speeds are in good agreement with the target aerodynamic forces generated using CFL3D code with the Euler equation. Excellent aeroelastic responses are obtained even with unsteady strain data under the signal to noise ratio of -9.8dB. The deflections, velocities, and accelerations at each sensor location are independent of structural and aerodynamic models. Therefore, the distributed strain data together with the current proposed approaches can be used as distributed deflection, velocity, and acceleration sensors. This research demonstrates the feasibility of obtaining induced drag and lift forces through the use of distributed sensor technology with measured strain data. An active induced drag control system thus can be designed using the two computed aerodynamic forces, induced drag and lift, to improve the fuel efficiency of an aircraft. Interpolation elements between structural finite element grids and the CFD grids and centroids are successfully incorporated with the unsteady aeroelastic computation scheme. The most critical technology for the success of the proposed approach is the robust on-line parameter estimator, since the least-squares curve fitting method depends heavily on aeroelastic system frequencies and damping factors.

[1]  Peretz P. Friedmann,et al.  Digital Adaptive Flutter Suppression and Simulation Using Approximate Transonic Aerodynamics , 1995 .

[2]  R. N. Desmarais,et al.  Interpolation using surface splines. , 1972 .

[3]  Anthony Washburn Drag Reduction Status and Plans - Laminar Flow and AFC , 2011 .

[4]  R. N. Desmarais,et al.  Curve fitting of aeroelastic transient response data with exponential functions , 1976 .

[5]  Shirley J. Dyke,et al.  System equivalent reduction expansion process , 2008 .

[6]  Chan-gi Pak,et al.  Acceleration and Velocity Sensing from Measured Strain , 2016 .

[7]  Chan-Gi Pak,et al.  Wing Shape Sensing from Measured Strain , 2015 .

[8]  Kazuro Kageyama,et al.  Measurement of distributed strain and load identification using 1500 mm gauge length FBG and optical frequency domain reflectometry , 2009, International Conference on Optical Fibre Sensors.

[9]  Ginu Rajan,et al.  Overview of Fiber Optic Sensor Technologies for Strain/Temperature Sensing Applications in Composite Materials , 2016, Sensors.

[10]  L Krist Sherrie,et al.  CFL3D User''s Manual (Version 5.0) , 1998 .

[11]  A. G. Rainey,et al.  An experimental investigation of aerodynamic effects of airfoil thickness on transonic flutter characteristics , 1959 .

[12]  Antonello Cutolo,et al.  Dynamic strain measurements by fibre Bragg grating sensor , 2004 .

[13]  Peretz P. Friedmann,et al.  New time-domain technique for flutter boundary identification , 1992 .

[14]  Alpheus W. Burner,et al.  Determining Aerodynamic Loads Based on Optical Deformation Measurements , 2001 .