The pigeon's recognition of drawings of depth-rotated stimuli.
暂无分享,去创建一个
I Biederman | E A Wasserman | I. Biederman | E. Wasserman | S. Astley | K. Kirkpatrick-Steger | J. L. Gagliardi | B. R. Cook | K Kirkpatrick-Steger | J L Gagliardi | B R Cook | S L Astley
[1] I. Biederman,et al. Viewpoint-dependent mechanisms in visual object recognition: Reply to Tarr and Bülthoff (1995). , 1995 .
[2] M J Tarr,et al. Is human object recognition better described by geon structural descriptions or by multiple views? Comment on Biederman and Gerhardstein (1993). , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[3] J. Delius,et al. Orientation invariant pattern recognition by pigeons (Columba livia) and humans (Homo sapiens). , 1995, Journal of comparative psychology.
[4] M. Tarr. Rotating objects to recognize them: A case study on the role of viewpoint dependency in the recognition of three-dimensional objects , 1995, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[5] J. Hummel. Reference Frames and Relations in Computational Models of Object Recognition , 1994 .
[6] N. Logothetis,et al. View-dependent object recognition by monkeys , 1994, Current Biology.
[7] I. Biederman,et al. Recognizing depth-rotated objects: evidence and conditions for three-dimensional viewpoint invariance. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[8] E. Wasserman. Picture Perception: A Bird's-Eye View , 1993 .
[9] I. Biederman,et al. Pigeons Are Sensitive to the Spatial Organization of Complex Visual Stimuli , 1993 .
[10] J. Pani. Limits on the Comprehension of Rotational Motion: Mental Imagery of Rotations with Oblique Components , 1993, Perception.
[11] Joël Fagot,et al. Rotation of Mental Images in Baboons When the Visual Input Is Directed to the Left Cerebral Hemisphere , 1993 .
[12] I. Biederman,et al. Discrimination of contour-deleted images by pigeons. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.
[13] Juan D. Delius,et al. Categorical discrimination of objects and pictures by pigeons , 1992 .
[14] I. Biederman,et al. Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition. , 1992, Psychological review.
[15] Edward A. Wasserman,et al. Categorical discrimination and generalization in pigeons all negative stimuli are not created equal , 1992 .
[16] I. Biederman,et al. Size invariance in visual object priming , 1992 .
[17] T. Poggio,et al. A network that learns to recognize three-dimensional objects , 1990, Nature.
[18] I. Biederman. Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. , 1987, Psychological review.
[19] J D Delius,et al. Rotational invariance in visual pattern recognition by pigeons and humans. , 1982, Science.
[20] D. Marr,et al. Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes , 1978, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.
[21] Ernest A. Lumsden,et al. Generalization of an operant response to photographs and drawings/silhouettes of a three-dimensional object at various orientations , 1977 .
[22] John Cerella,et al. Absence of perspective processing in the pigeon , 1977, Pattern Recognit..
[23] I. Biederman,et al. Shape constancy and a perceptual bias towards symmetry , 1976 .
[24] Malcolm D. Arnoult,et al. Orientation and Form , 1974 .
[25] D. Wilkie. Attention and "visual field dependency" in the pigeon. , 1973, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[26] D. P. Ferraro,et al. Discrimination and Generalization of Complex Visual Shape Variations in Pigeons , 1972, Perceptual and motor skills.
[27] R. Shepard,et al. Mental Rotation of Three-Dimensional Objects , 1971, Science.
[28] E. Hearst,et al. Generalization and discrimination of shape orientation in the pigeon. , 1968, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[29] H. S. Pennypacker,et al. Positive and negative generalization gradients obtained after equivalent training conditions. , 1963 .
[30] G S REYNOLDS,et al. Contrast, generalization, and the process of discrimination. , 1961, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[31] N. Guttman,et al. Stimulus generalization after training on three stimuli: a test of the summation hypothesis. , 1959, Journal of experimental psychology.
[32] N. Guttman,et al. Stimulus generalization after equal training on two stimuli. , 1957, Journal of experimental psychology.
[33] K. Spence. The differential response in animals to stimuli varying within a single dimension. , 1937 .
[34] E. Wasserman,et al. The what and the where of the pigeon's processing of complex visual stimuli. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.
[35] E. Wasserman,et al. A behavioral Analysis of Concepts: Its Application to Pigeons and Children , 1994 .
[36] M. Kubovy,et al. Does pattern matching require the normalization of size and orientation? , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.
[37] Julian Hochberg,et al. The Psychology of Visual Perception. 2nd ed. , 1981 .
[38] P. Cabe. Picture Perception in Nonhuman Subjects , 1980 .
[39] R. Haber,et al. The psychology of visual perception , 1973 .
[40] W. MASSAROt. The perception of rotated shapes : A process analysis of shape constancy * , 1973 .
[41] R. Rescorla,et al. A theory of Pavlovian conditioning : Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement , 1972 .
[42] N. Guttman,et al. Discriminability and stimulus generalization. , 1956, Journal of experimental psychology.