The pigeon's recognition of drawings of depth-rotated stimuli.

Four experiments used a four-choice discrimination learning paradigm to explore the pigeon's recognition of line drawings of four objects (an airplane, a chair, a desk lamp, and a flashlight) that were rotated in depth. The pigeons reliably generalized discriminative responding to pictorial stimuli over all untrained depth rotations, despite the bird's having been trained at only a single depth orientation. These generalization gradients closely resembled those found in prior research that used other stimulus dimensions. Increasing the number of different vantage points in the training set from one to three broadened the range of generalized testing performance, with wider spacing of the training orientations more effectively broadening generalized responding. Template and geon theories of visual recognition are applied to these empirical results.

[1]  I. Biederman,et al.  Viewpoint-dependent mechanisms in visual object recognition: Reply to Tarr and Bülthoff (1995). , 1995 .

[2]  M J Tarr,et al.  Is human object recognition better described by geon structural descriptions or by multiple views? Comment on Biederman and Gerhardstein (1993). , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  J. Delius,et al.  Orientation invariant pattern recognition by pigeons (Columba livia) and humans (Homo sapiens). , 1995, Journal of comparative psychology.

[4]  M. Tarr Rotating objects to recognize them: A case study on the role of viewpoint dependency in the recognition of three-dimensional objects , 1995, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[5]  J. Hummel Reference Frames and Relations in Computational Models of Object Recognition , 1994 .

[6]  N. Logothetis,et al.  View-dependent object recognition by monkeys , 1994, Current Biology.

[7]  I. Biederman,et al.  Recognizing depth-rotated objects: evidence and conditions for three-dimensional viewpoint invariance. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  E. Wasserman Picture Perception: A Bird's-Eye View , 1993 .

[9]  I. Biederman,et al.  Pigeons Are Sensitive to the Spatial Organization of Complex Visual Stimuli , 1993 .

[10]  J. Pani Limits on the Comprehension of Rotational Motion: Mental Imagery of Rotations with Oblique Components , 1993, Perception.

[11]  Joël Fagot,et al.  Rotation of Mental Images in Baboons When the Visual Input Is Directed to the Left Cerebral Hemisphere , 1993 .

[12]  I. Biederman,et al.  Discrimination of contour-deleted images by pigeons. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[13]  Juan D. Delius,et al.  Categorical discrimination of objects and pictures by pigeons , 1992 .

[14]  I. Biederman,et al.  Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition. , 1992, Psychological review.

[15]  Edward A. Wasserman,et al.  Categorical discrimination and generalization in pigeons all negative stimuli are not created equal , 1992 .

[16]  I. Biederman,et al.  Size invariance in visual object priming , 1992 .

[17]  T. Poggio,et al.  A network that learns to recognize three-dimensional objects , 1990, Nature.

[18]  I. Biederman Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. , 1987, Psychological review.

[19]  J D Delius,et al.  Rotational invariance in visual pattern recognition by pigeons and humans. , 1982, Science.

[20]  D. Marr,et al.  Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes , 1978, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[21]  Ernest A. Lumsden,et al.  Generalization of an operant response to photographs and drawings/silhouettes of a three-dimensional object at various orientations , 1977 .

[22]  John Cerella,et al.  Absence of perspective processing in the pigeon , 1977, Pattern Recognit..

[23]  I. Biederman,et al.  Shape constancy and a perceptual bias towards symmetry , 1976 .

[24]  Malcolm D. Arnoult,et al.  Orientation and Form , 1974 .

[25]  D. Wilkie Attention and "visual field dependency" in the pigeon. , 1973, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[26]  D. P. Ferraro,et al.  Discrimination and Generalization of Complex Visual Shape Variations in Pigeons , 1972, Perceptual and motor skills.

[27]  R. Shepard,et al.  Mental Rotation of Three-Dimensional Objects , 1971, Science.

[28]  E. Hearst,et al.  Generalization and discrimination of shape orientation in the pigeon. , 1968, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[29]  H. S. Pennypacker,et al.  Positive and negative generalization gradients obtained after equivalent training conditions. , 1963 .

[30]  G S REYNOLDS,et al.  Contrast, generalization, and the process of discrimination. , 1961, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[31]  N. Guttman,et al.  Stimulus generalization after training on three stimuli: a test of the summation hypothesis. , 1959, Journal of experimental psychology.

[32]  N. Guttman,et al.  Stimulus generalization after equal training on two stimuli. , 1957, Journal of experimental psychology.

[33]  K. Spence The differential response in animals to stimuli varying within a single dimension. , 1937 .

[34]  E. Wasserman,et al.  The what and the where of the pigeon's processing of complex visual stimuli. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[35]  E. Wasserman,et al.  A behavioral Analysis of Concepts: Its Application to Pigeons and Children , 1994 .

[36]  M. Kubovy,et al.  Does pattern matching require the normalization of size and orientation? , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.

[37]  Julian Hochberg,et al.  The Psychology of Visual Perception. 2nd ed. , 1981 .

[38]  P. Cabe Picture Perception in Nonhuman Subjects , 1980 .

[39]  R. Haber,et al.  The psychology of visual perception , 1973 .

[40]  W. MASSAROt The perception of rotated shapes : A process analysis of shape constancy * , 1973 .

[41]  R. Rescorla,et al.  A theory of Pavlovian conditioning : Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement , 1972 .

[42]  N. Guttman,et al.  Discriminability and stimulus generalization. , 1956, Journal of experimental psychology.