A Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Oddi Continuing Learning Inventory (OCLI)

Oddi's 24-item Continuing Learning Inventory (OCLI) is an instrument that has been used frequently to measure self-directed learning. Although three previous studies have assessed OCLI's underlying dimensions, the conflicting results of those studies prompted this further investigation that used a series of factor analyses of the 250 responses from University of Toronto undergraduate medical students. Although exploratory factor analyses yielded results consistent with Oddi's empirically derived three-factor model, further analyses of the student responses suggested that OCLI's underlying dimensions are better described by four factors. This four-factor model was also identified through confirmatory factor analyses. These four underlying OCLI dimensions—Learning With Others, Learner Motivation/Self-Efficacy/Autonomy, Ability to be Self-Regulating, and Reading Avidity—provide further specificity and insights for examining and better understanding students' self-directed learning.

[1]  L. Oddi,et al.  Development and Validation of an Instrument to Identify Self-Directed Continuing Learners , 1986 .

[2]  R. Sitgreaves.  Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). , 1979 .

[3]  Jack E. Six.  The Generality of the Underlying Dimensions of the ODDI Continuing Learning Inventory , 1989 .

[4]  Ralph G. Brockett,et al.  Self-Direction in Adult Learning , 1991 .

[5]  L. Newell,et al.  Self-direction in adult learning: perspectives on theory, research, and practice. Ralph G. Brockett and Roger Hiemstra New York: Routledge, 199 1. 276 pages. $35.00 , 1995 .

[6]  E. Carmines,et al.  Analyzing models with unobserved variables: analysis of covariance structures , 1981 .

[7]  B. Byrne.  Structural Equation Modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming , 1998 .

[8]  M. Boekaerts.  Self-Regulated Learning. , 1999 .

[9]  P. Bentler,et al.  Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structures , 1980 .

[10]  Lorys Fuge Oddi.  DEVELOPMENT OF AN INSTRUMENT TO MEASURE SELF-DIRECTED CONTINUING LEARNING. , 1984 .

[11]  G. Bohrnstedt,et al.  Social Measurement: Current Issues , 1981 .

[12]  Current Developments in Self-Directed Learning. , 1996 .

[13]  L. Guglielmino.  Development of the self-directed learning readiness scale , 1977 .

[14]  P. R. Manning.  CONTINUING LEARNING IN THE PROFESSIONS , 1980 .

[15]  B. Zimmerman,et al.  Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications. , 1994 .

[16]  Gerald A Straka.  Conceptions of self-directed learning : theoretical and conceptional considerations , 2000 .

[17]  A. Tough.  The adult's learning projects : a fresh approach to theory and practice in adult learning , 1979 .

[18]  K. Bollen.  A New Incremental Fit Index for General Structural Equation Models , 1989 .

[19]  R. Frecker,et al.  Effect of an Undergraduate Medical Curriculum on Students’ Self-Directed Learning , 2003, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[20]  L. Oddi,et al.  Perspectives On Self-Directed Learning , 1987 .

[21]  H. Long.  New dimensions in self-directed learning , 1995 .

[22]  Construct Validation of the Oddi Continuing Learning Inventory , 1990 .

[23]  D. Garrison.  Self-Directed Learning: Toward a Comprehensive Model , 1997 .

[24]  D. Dillman.  Mail and telephone surveys : the total design method , 1979 .

[25]  P. Pintrich.  The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning , 1999 .

[26]  Karl G. Jöreskog,et al.  Lisrel 8: User's Reference Guide , 1997 .