Dendritic connectivity controls biodiversity patterns in experimental metacommunities

Biological communities often occur in spatially structured habitats where connectivity directly affects dispersal and metacommunity processes. Recent theoretical work suggests that dispersal constrained by the connectivity of specific habitat structures, such as dendrites like river networks, can explain observed features of biodiversity, but direct evidence is still lacking. We experimentally show that connectivity per se shapes diversity patterns in microcosm metacommunities at different levels. Local dispersal in isotropic lattice landscapes homogenizes local species richness and leads to pronounced spatial persistence. On the contrary, dispersal along dendritic landscapes leads to higher variability in local diversity and among-community composition. Although headwaters exhibit relatively lower species richness, they are crucial for the maintenance of regional biodiversity. Our results establish that spatially constrained dendritic connectivity is a key factor for community composition and population persistence.

[1]  A. Rinaldo,et al.  Effects of Connectivity and Recurrent Local Disturbances on Community Structure and Population Density in Experimental Metacommunities , 2011, PloS one.

[2]  Sebastian Schreiber,et al.  Interactive effects of disturbance and dispersal directionality on species richness and composition in metacommunities. , 2011, Ecology.

[3]  Enrico Bertuzzo,et al.  Spatial effects on species persistence and implications for biodiversity , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  T. Fukami,et al.  Assembly history dictates ecosystem functioning: evidence from wood decomposer communities. , 2010, Ecology letters.

[5]  C. Swan,et al.  Dendritic network structure constrains metacommunity properties in riverine ecosystems. , 2010, The Journal of animal ecology.

[6]  Michael B. Morrissey,et al.  The Maintenance of Genetic Variation Due to Asymmetric Gene Flow in Dendritic Metapopulations , 2009, The American Naturalist.

[7]  Janneke HilleRisLambers,et al.  The importance of niches for the maintenance of species diversity , 2009, Nature.

[8]  Jayanth R Banavar,et al.  Inferring species interactions in tropical forests , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  Y. Bar-Yam,et al.  Global patterns of speciation and diversity , 2009, Nature.

[10]  P. S. Lake,et al.  Macroinvertebrate diversity in headwater streams: a review , 2008 .

[11]  Brett A. Melbourne,et al.  Extinction risk depends strongly on factors contributing to stochasticity , 2008, Nature.

[12]  Z. Hroudová,et al.  Detecting dispersal of Nuphar lutea in river corridors using microsatellite markers , 2008 .

[13]  R. Muneepeerakul,et al.  Neutral metacommunity models predict fish diversity patterns in Mississippi–Missouri basin , 2008, Nature.

[14]  M. Holyoak,et al.  Species' traits predict the effects of disturbance and productivity on diversity. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[15]  M. Cadotte,et al.  Competition-colonization trade-offs and disturbance effects at multiple scales. , 2007, Ecology.

[16]  S. Levin,et al.  A neutral metapopulation model of biodiversity in river networks. , 2007, Journal of theoretical biology.

[17]  W. Fagan,et al.  Living in the branches: population dynamics and ecological processes in dendritic networks. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[18]  Joshua S Madin,et al.  Ecological consequences of major hydrodynamic disturbances on coral reefs , 2006, Nature.

[19]  Don A. Driscoll,et al.  Metacommunities: Spatial Dynamics and Ecological Communities , 2006 .

[20]  Michael D. Collins,et al.  On Testing the Competition‐Colonization Trade‐Off in a Multispecies Assemblage , 2006, The American Naturalist.

[21]  Nick M Haddad,et al.  Corridors Increase Plant Species Richness at Large Scales , 2006, Science.

[22]  Dispersal frequency affects local biomass production by controlling local diversity. , 2006, Ecology letters.

[23]  B. Cardinale,et al.  Geographic patterns of diversity in streams are predicted by a multivariate model of disturbance and productivity , 2006 .

[24]  M. Cadotte,et al.  Dispersal and Species Diversity: A Meta‐Analysis , 2006, The American Naturalist.

[25]  M. Cadotte,et al.  Metacommunity influences on community richness at multiple spatial scales: a microcosm experiment. , 2006, Ecology.

[26]  S. Hubbell,et al.  Density dependence explains tree species abundance and diversity in tropical forests , 2005, Nature.

[27]  R. Desharnais.  Population dynamics and laboratory ecology , 2005 .

[28]  Mathew A. Leibold,et al.  Metacommunities: Spatial Dynamics and Ecological Communities , 2005 .

[29]  M. Holyoak,et al.  The Contribution of Laboratory Experiments on Protists to Understanding Population and Metapopulation Dynamics , 2005 .

[30]  C. C. Fernandes,et al.  Amazonian Ecology: Tributaries Enhance the Diversity of Electric Fishes , 2004, Science.

[31]  Daniel R. Miller,et al.  The Network Dynamics Hypothesis: How Channel Networks Structure Riverine Habitats , 2004 .

[32]  B. Kerr,et al.  Big questions, small worlds: microbial model systems in ecology. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[33]  T. Fukami,et al.  Productivity–biodiversity relationships depend on the history of community assembly , 2003, Nature.

[34]  W. Fagan.  CONNECTIVITY, FRAGMENTATION, AND EXTINCTION RISK IN DENDRITIC METAPOPULATIONS , 2002 .

[35]  M. Meadows.  The Unified Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography BY STEPHEN P. HUBBELL xiv + 375 pp., 21.5 × 14 × 2.2 cm, ISBN 0 691 02128 7 paperback, US$ 29.95/GB£ 19.95, Princeton, NJ, USA/Woodstock, UK: Princeton University Press, 2001 , 2002, Environmental Conservation.

[36]  Alessandro Flammini,et al.  Scaling, Optimality, and Landscape Evolution , 2001 .

[37]  Timothy H. Keitt,et al.  LANDSCAPE CONNECTIVITY: A GRAPH‐THEORETIC PERSPECTIVE , 2001 .

[38]  T. Fukami.  Sequence effects of disturbance on community structure , 2001 .

[39]  P. Chesson.  Mechanisms of Maintenance of Species Diversity , 2000 .

[40]  Amos Maritan,et al.  Size and form in efficient transportation networks , 1999, Nature.

[41]  Gonzalez,et al.  Metapopulation dynamics, abundance, and distribution in a microecosystem , 1998, Science.

[42]  Jill McGrady-Steed,et al.  Biodiversity regulates ecosystem predictability , 1997, Nature.

[43]  A. Maritan,et al.  Sculpting of a Fractal River Basin , 1997 .

[44]  A. Rinaldo,et al.  Fractal River Basins: Chance and Self-Organization , 1997 .

[45]  P. Warren.  Dispersal and destruction in a multiple habitat system: an experimental approach using protist communities , 1996 .

[46]  W. Ebeling.  Stochastic Processes in Physics and Chemistry , 1995 .

[47]  A. Hastings,et al.  Persistence of Transients in Spatially Structured Ecological Models , 1994, Science.

[48]  Alessandro Marani,et al.  Minimum energy and fractal structures of drainage networks , 1992 .

[49]  Alessandro Marani,et al.  Fractal Structures as Least Energy Patterns - the Case of River Networks , 1992 .

[50]  N. Kampen,et al.  Stochastic processes in physics and chemistry , 1981 .

[51]  D. Gillespie.  Exact Stochastic Simulation of Coupled Chemical Reactions , 1977 .

[52]  A. Sheldon.  Species Diversity and Longitudinal Succession in Stream Fishes , 1968 .