The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) established strict regulations for highway diesel engine exhaust emissions of particulate matter (PM) and nitrogen oxides (NOx) to aid in meeting the National Ambient Air Quality Standards. The emission standards were phased in with stringent standards for 2007 model year (MY) heavy-duty engines (HDEs), and even more stringent NOX standards for 2010 and later model years. The Health Effects Institute, in cooperation with the Coordinating Research Council, funded by government and the private sector, designed and conducted a research program, the Advanced Collaborative Emission Study (ACES), with multiple objectives, including detailed characterization of the emissions from both 2007- and 2010-compliant engines. The results from emission testing of 2007-compliant engines have already been reported in a previous publication. This paper reports the emissions testing results for three heavy-duty 2010-compliant engines intended for on-highway use. These engines were equipped with an exhaust diesel oxidation catalyst (DOC), high-efficiency catalyzed diesel particle filter (DPF), urea-based selective catalytic reduction catalyst (SCR), and ammonia slip catalyst (AMOX), and were fueled with ultra-low-sulfur diesel fuel (~6.5 ppm sulfur). Average regulated and unregulated emissions of more than 780 chemical species were characterized in engine exhaust under transient engine operation using the Federal Test Procedure cycle and a 16-hr duty cycle representing a wide dynamic range of real-world engine operation. The 2010 engines’ regulated emissions of PM, NOX, nonmethane hydrocarbons, and carbon monoxide were all well below the EPA 2010 emission standards. Moreover, the unregulated emissions of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), nitroPAHs, hopanes and steranes, alcohols and organic acids, alkanes, carbonyls, dioxins and furans, inorganic ions, metals and elements, elemental carbon, and particle number were substantially (90 to >99%) lower than pre-2007-technology engine emissions, and also substantially (46 to >99%) lower than the 2007-technology engine emissions characterized in the previous study. Implications: Heavy-duty on-highway diesel engines equipped with DOC/DPF/SCR/AMOX and fueled with ultra-low-sulfur diesel fuel produced lower emissions than the stringent 2010 emission standards established by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. They also resulted in significant reductions in a wide range of unregulated toxic emission compounds relative to older technology engines. The increased use of newer technology (2010+) diesel engines in the on-highway sector and the adaptation of such technology by other sectors such as nonroad, displacing older, higher emissions engines, will have a positive impact on ambient levels of PM, NOx, and volatile organic compounds, in addition to many other toxic compounds.
[1]
T. Johnson.
Diesel Emission Control in Review
,
2001
.
[2]
Christine Kay Lambert,et al.
The Effect of Hydrocarbons on the Selective Catalyzed Reduction of NOx over Low and High Temperature Catalyst Formulations
,
2008
.
[3]
R. W. Waytulonis,et al.
Chemical analysis of diesel engine nanoparticles using a nano-DMA/thermal desorption particle beam mass spectrometer.
,
2001,
Environmental science & technology.
[4]
C. Passut,et al.
API CI-4: The First Oil Category for Diesel Engines Using Cooled Exhaust Gas Recirculation
,
2002
.
[5]
Thomas W Hesterberg,et al.
Evaluation of carcinogenic hazard of diesel engine exhaust needs to consider revolutionary changes in diesel technology.
,
2012,
Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.
[6]
Kim Anne Smith.
Transportation and air quality
,
1991
.
[7]
Neal W. Currier,et al.
Impact of different forms of feed sulfur on small-pore Cu-zeolite SCR catalyst
,
2014
.
[8]
Johannes A. Lercher,et al.
Adsorption of SO2 on different metal impregnated zeolites
,
2004
.
[9]
Krishna Kamasamudram,et al.
Impact of Sulfur-Oxides on the Ammonia Slip Catalyst Performance
,
2014
.
[10]
Christine Kay Lambert,et al.
Influence of Hydrocarbon Storage on the Durability of SCR Catalysts
,
2008
.
[11]
T. Johnson.
Review of Diesel Emissions and Control
,
2010
.
[12]
Imad A. Khalek,et al.
Nanoparticle growth during dilution and cooling of diesel exhaust: Experimental investigation and theoretical assessment
,
2000
.
[13]
Barbara Zielinska,et al.
Regulated and Unregulated Emissions from Highway Heavy-Duty Diesel Engines Complying with U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 2007 Emissions Standards
,
2011,
Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.
[14]
David B. Kittelson,et al.
Diesel Trap Performance: Particle Size Measurements and Trends
,
1998
.
[15]
W. M. Kleiser,et al.
API CJ-4: Diesel Oil Category for Pre-2007 Engines and New Low Emission Engines Using Cooled Exhaust Gas Recirculation and Diesel Particulate Filters
,
2007
.
[16]
T. Johnson,et al.
Diesel Emissions in Review
,
2011
.