BAYESIAN HIERARCHICAL MODELING FOR SIGNALING PATHWAY INFERENCE FROM SINGLE CELL INTERVENTIONAL DATA.

Recent technological advances have made it possible to simultaneously measure multiple protein activities at the single cell level. With such data collected under different stimulatory or inhibitory conditions, it is possible to infer the causal relationships among proteins from single cell interventional data. In this article we propose a Bayesian hierarchical modeling framework to infer the signaling pathway based on the posterior distributions of parameters in the model. Under this framework, we consider network sparsity and model the existence of an association between two proteins both at the overall level across all experiments and at each individual experimental level. This allows us to infer the pairs of proteins that are associated with each other and their causal relationships. We also explicitly consider both intrinsic noise and measurement error. Markov chain Monte Carlo is implemented for statistical inference. We demonstrate that this hierarchical modeling can effectively pool information from different interventional experiments through simulation studies and real data analysis.

[1]  K. Sachs,et al.  Causal Protein-Signaling Networks Derived from Multiparameter Single-Cell Data , 2005, Science.

[2]  D. Heckerman,et al.  Dependency networks for inference , 2000 .

[3]  M. Roederer,et al.  The history and future of the fluorescence activated cell sorter and flow cytometry: a view from Stanford. , 2002, Clinical chemistry.

[4]  Garry P. Nolan,et al.  Simultaneous measurement of multiple active kinase states using polychromatic flow cytometry , 2002, Nature Biotechnology.

[5]  M. J. Bibby,et al.  Case study 5: Processing to produce automobile radiators , 1999 .

[6]  M. West,et al.  Sparse graphical models for exploring gene expression data , 2004 .

[7]  Michael I. Jordan Graphical Models , 1998 .

[8]  Marco Grzegorczyk,et al.  Comparative evaluation of reverse engineering gene regulatory networks with relevance networks, graphical gaussian models and bayesian networks , 2006, Bioinform..

[9]  W. Wong,et al.  Learning Causal Bayesian Network Structures From Experimental Data , 2008 .

[10]  Nir Friedman,et al.  Being Bayesian about Network Structure , 2000, UAI.

[11]  D. Pe’er Bayesian Network Analysis of Signaling Networks: A Primer , 2005, Science's STKE.

[12]  M. Ringnér,et al.  Revealing signaling pathway deregulation by using gene expression signatures and regulatory motif analysis , 2007, Genome Biology.

[13]  Hongzhe Li,et al.  A hidden spatial-temporal Markov random field model for network-based analysis of time course gene expression data , 2008, 0803.3942.

[14]  Nir Friedman,et al.  Inferring subnetworks from perturbed expression profiles , 2001, ISMB.

[15]  RockOn Team,et al.  Re: Attenuation compensation in single-photon emission tomography: a comparative evaluation. , 1983, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[16]  Korbinian Strimmer,et al.  An empirical Bayes approach to inferring large-scale gene association networks , 2005, Bioinform..

[17]  Hongzhe Li,et al.  A Markov random field model for network-based analysis of genomic data , 2007, Bioinform..