The Bin Area Method: A Computationally Efficient Technique for Analysis of Ventricular and Atrial Intracardiac Electrograms

Recent studies have reported a significant false positive rate in delivery of therapy by implantable antitachycardia devices utilizing detection algorithms based on sustained high rate. More selective decision schemes for the recognition of life‐threatening arrhythmias have been recently proposed that use analysis of the intrinsic electrogram rather than rate alone. Morphological discrimination of abnormal electrograms using correlation waveform analysis (CWA) has been proposed as an effective method of intracardiac electrogram analysis, but its computational demands limit its use in implantable devices. A new method for intracardiac electrogram analysis, the bin area method (BAM), was created to detect abnormal cardiac conduction with computational requirements of one‐half to one‐tenth those of CWA. Like CWA, BAM is a template matching method that is sensitive to conduction changes revealed in the electrogram morphology and is independent of amplitude and baseline fluctuations. Performance of BAM and CWA were compared using bipolar right ventricular and right atrial electrode recordings from 47 patients undergoing clinical cardiac electrophysiology studies. Nineteen patients had 31 distinct monomorphic ventricular tachycardias (VTs) induced (group I), thirteen patients had paroxysmal bundle branch block of supraventricular origin (BBB) induced (group II), and 19 patients had retrograde atrial activation during right ventricular overdrive pacing (group III). (One patient was common to all three groups, and two patients were common to groups II and III.) Using the ventricular electrogram, both BAM and CWA distinguished VT from sinus rhythm in 28/31 (90%) cases, and BBB from Normal Sinus Rhythm (NSR) in 13/13 (100%) patients. Using the atrial electrogram, both BAM and CWA distinguished anterograde from retrograde atrial activation in 19/19 (100%) patients. BAM achieves similar performance to CWA with significantly reduced computational demands, and may make real‐time analysis of intracardiac electrograms feasible for implantable pacemakers and antitachycardia devices.

[1]  J M Jenkins,et al.  Paroxysmal Bundle Branch Block of Supraventricular Origin: A Possible Source of Misdiagnosis in Detecting Ventricular Tachycardia Using Time Domain Analyses of Intraventricular Electrograms , 1990, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[2]  J M Jenkins,et al.  Discrimination of Retrograde from Anterograde Atrial Activation Using Intracardiac Electrogram Waveform Analysis , 1989, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[3]  S. Vatner,et al.  Isoproterenol-induced alterations in myocardial blood flow, systolic and diastolic function in conscious dogs with heart failure. , 1989, Circulation.

[4]  S. Furman,et al.  Atrial Electrogram Analysis: Antegrade Versus Retrograde , 1988, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[5]  J. Jenkins,et al.  Identification of Ventricular Tachycardia Using Intracavitary Ventricular Electrograms: Analysis of Time and Frequency Domain Patterns , 1988, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[6]  J. Langberg,et al.  Identification of ventricular tachycardia with use of the morphology of the endocardial electrogram. , 1988, Circulation.

[7]  S. Furman,et al.  Frequency spectra of ventricular tachycardia and sinus rhythm in human intracardiac electrograms-application to tachycardia detection for cardiac pacemakers , 1988, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[8]  G. Tomaselli,et al.  Morphologic Differences of the Endocardial Electrogram in Beats of Sinus and Ventricular Origin * , 1988, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[9]  S Gordon,et al.  Discrimination of Anterograde From Retrograde Atrial Electrograms for Physiologic Pacing , 1988, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[10]  E. Ford,et al.  In-hospital mortality rates from acute myocardial infarction by race in U.S. hospitals: findings from the National Hospital Discharge Survey. , 1987, Circulation.

[11]  S Furman,et al.  Automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: patient survival, battery longevity and shock delivery analysis. , 1987, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  A. Camm,et al.  Pacing Techniques in the Prophylaxis of Junctional Reentry Tachycardia , 1987, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[13]  F. Pannizzo,et al.  Discrimination of antegrade and retrograde atrial depolarization by electrogram analysis. , 1986, American heart journal.

[14]  A. Camm,et al.  Detection of Pathological Tachycardia by Analysis of Electrogram Morphology , 1986, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[15]  B. Lüderitz,et al.  Erroneous discharge from an implanted automatic defibrillator during supraventricular tachyarrhythmia induced ventricular fibrillation. , 1986, The American journal of cardiology.

[16]  P E Oyer,et al.  Clinical experience, complications, and survival in 70 patients with the automatic implantable cardioverter/defibrillator. , 1985, Circulation.

[17]  R Wainwright,et al.  Ideal Atrial Lead Positioning to Detect Retrograde Atrial Depolarization by Digitization and Slope Analysis of the Atrial Electrogram , 1984, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[18]  William J. McEwen,et al.  Pace , 1974 .