Software-driven changes to business processes: An empirical study of impacts of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems at the local level

This paper explores the impact of software-driven process changes on manufacturing organizations. As packaged systems, rather than those developed for an individual company, Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems demand more than ever before that organizational subunits adapt their business processes to fit the imperatives of the software. The best practice line of thinking suggests that this ERP-driven business process change will yield positive organizational impacts. Thus, we present the following: H1: ERP systems result in organizational subunits' changing their business processes. H2: ERP-driven changes in business practices are associated with positive impacts of using the software. Hypotheses are evaluated using a test of mean difference and a Pearson correlation on data gathered from a pencil-and-paper survey directed at subunits of manufacturing businesses. Seventy-seven surveys were used. H1 was supported; H2 was not. The results call into question prescriptions from the literature about the superiority of so-called best practices as well as the blanket recommendations about the modification of organizational business processes to fit the capabilities of an ERP system. Results are also discussed in the context of several case studies.

[1]  S. Green.  How Many Subjects Does It Take To Do A Regression Analysis. , 1991, Multivariate behavioral research.

[2]  August-Wilhelm Scheer,et al.  Enterprise resource planning: making ERP a success , 2000, CACM.

[3]  Terry Hill,et al.  Manufacturing Strategy: Text and Cases , 1993 .

[4]  Rex Eugene Pereira.  Resource view theory analysis of SAP as a source of competitive advantage for firms , 1999, DATB.

[5]  T. Davenport.  Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[6]  Anand Teltumbde,et al.  A framework for evaluating ERP projects , 2000 .

[7]  J. Ross.  The ERP Revolution : Surviving Versus Thriving , 2001 .

[8]  Marianne Bradford,et al.  Does ERP Fit in a LEAN World , 2001 .

[9]  Sia Siew Kien,et al.  Enterprise resource planning: cultural fits and misfits: is ERP a universal solution? , 2000, CACM.

[10]  Judy E. Scott,et al.  Enhancing functionality in an enterprise software package , 2000, Inf. Manag..

[11]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[12]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  Understanding the plant level costs and benefits of ERP: will the ugly duckling always turn into a swan? , 2000, Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[13]  Laurie J. Kirsch,et al.  The Impact of Data Integration on the Costs and Benefits of Information Systems , 1992, MIS Q..

[14]  T. Curran,et al.  SAP R/3 Business Blueprint: Understanding the Business Process Reference Model , 1997 .

[15]  Jeanne W. Ross,et al.  The ERP Revolution: Surviving vs. Thriving , 2000, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[16]  M. Markus,et al.  The Enterprise System Experience— From Adoption to Success , 2000 .

[17]  Earl R. Babbie,et al.  The practice of social research , 1969 .

[18]  Prasad Bingi,et al.  Critical Issues Affecting an ERP Implementation , 1999, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[19]  Vinod Kumar,et al.  Enterprise resource planning systems adoption process: A survey of Canadian organizations , 2002 .