Effects of 9/11 on individuals and organizations: down but not out!

Purpose – The purpose of this introduction is to review some of the major issues that arose after 9/11 and set the stage for the articles that follow.Design/methodology/approach – A literature review was undertaken using both academic and mass media sources.Findings – The events of 9/11 have produced potentially positive as well as negative consequences, some anticipated and others unforeseen.Research limitations/implications – Relatively little research has been conducted on the events following 9/11, making it difficult to arrive at solid conclusions at this time.Practical implications – This special issue links the events of 9/11 with the management of organizations, a topic that has received little attention, and hopefully will encourage more scholarship in this area.Originality/value – It is important to more fully understand why 9/11 happened and what measures need to be taken to reduce the likelihood of future terrorist attacks, as well as improve the resiliency of both citizens and their organizat...

[1]  Andrew Baum,et al.  Coping with chronic stress at Three Mile Island: Psychological and biochemical evidence. , 1983 .

[2]  E. Lenz,et al.  Self-Efficacy and Social Support , 1987 .

[3]  S. Kleinman A terrorist hijacking: Victims' experiences initially and 9 years later , 1989 .

[4]  J. Freedy,et al.  Towards an understanding of the psychological impact of natural disasters : an application of the conservation resources stress model , 1992 .

[5]  A. Shalev Posttraumatic Stress Disorder among Injured Survivors of a Terrorist Attack: Predictive Value of Early Intrusion and Avoidance Symptoms , 1992, The Journal of nervous and mental disease.

[6]  J. Schwarzwald,et al.  Coping of school-age children in the sealed room during scud missile bombardment and postwar stress reactions. , 1993, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[7]  F. Norris,et al.  Received and perceived social support in times of stress: a test of the social support deterioration deterrence model. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[8]  D. Guthrie,et al.  When the earth stops shaking: earthquake sequelae among children diagnosed for pre-earthquake psychopathology. , 1999, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.

[9]  Charles S. Carver,et al.  Conservation of resources and coping self-efficacy predicting distress following a natural disaster: A causal model analysis where the environment meets the mind , 1999 .

[10]  G. Sprang Post-Disaster Stress Following the Oklahoma City Bombing , 1999 .

[11]  Charles C. Benight,et al.  Coping Self‐Efficacy and Psychological Distress Following the Oklahoma City Bombing1 , 2000 .

[12]  B. Pfefferbaum,et al.  Posttraumatic Stress Two Years after the Oklahoma City Bombing in Youths Geographically Distant from the Explosion , 2000, Psychiatry.

[13]  Tom W. Smith,et al.  America Rebounds: A National Study of Public Response to the September 11 th Terrorist Attacks , 2001 .

[14]  M. Elliott,et al.  A national survey of stress reactions after the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  G. Sprang Vicarious Stress: Patterns of Disturbance and Use of Mental Health Services by Those Indirectly Affected by the Oklahoma City Bombing , 2001, Psychological reports.

[16]  J. Dovidio,et al.  Public Attitudes Toward Immigration in the United States and Canada in Response to the September 11, 2001 “Attack on America” , 2002 .

[17]  David Stark,et al.  Crisis, Recovery, Innovation: Responsive Organization after September 11 , 2002 .

[18]  Virginia Gil-Rivas,et al.  Nationwide longitudinal study of psychological responses to September 11. , 2002, JAMA.

[19]  Lal Fernando The World Trade Center Disaster , 2002, Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie.

[20]  S. Galea,et al.  Psychological sequelae of the September 11 terrorist attacks in New York City. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  Henry W. Fischer Terrorism and 11 September 2001: does the “behavioral response to disaster” model fit? , 2002 .

[22]  Susana Salgado Next Door to Disaster , 2002 .

[23]  Amy Wrzesniewski “It’s Not Just a Job” , 2002 .

[24]  Lisa Thalji,et al.  Psychological reactions to terrorist attacks: findings from the National Study of Americans' Reactions to September 11. , 2002, JAMA.

[25]  F. Norris,et al.  60,000 Disaster Victims Speak: Part I. An Empirical Review of the Empirical Literature, 1981—2001 , 2002, Psychiatry.

[26]  J. Greenberg,et al.  Terror management research: Prejudice and self-esteem striving. , 2003 .

[27]  Ramona Houmanfar,et al.  The Impact of Terrorism on the US Economy and Business , 2003 .

[28]  James M. Kendra,et al.  Elements of resilience after the World Trade Center disaster: reconstituting New York City's Emergency Operations Centre. , 2003, Disasters.

[29]  David Stark,et al.  The Organization of Responsiveness: Innovation and Recovery in the Trading Rooms of Lower Manhattan , 2003 .

[30]  C. Benight Collective efficacy following a series of natural disasters , 2004 .

[31]  Miguel R. Olivas-Lujan,et al.  1 SEPTEMBER 11 , 2001 : TWO QUASI-EXPERIMENTS ON THE INFLUENCE OF THREATS ON CULTURAL VALUES AND COSMOPOLITANISM , 2004 .

[32]  Jack N. Kondrasuk,et al.  The Effects of 9/11 and Terrorism on Human Resource Management: Recovery, Reconsideration, and Renewal , 2004 .

[33]  S. Hofmann,et al.  Coping and anxiety in college students after the September 11th terrorist attacks , 2004 .

[34]  Fran H. Norris,et al.  Social support in the aftermath of disasters, catastrophes, and acts of terrorism: altruistic, overwhelmed, uncertain, antagonistic, and patriotic communities. , 2004 .