Single and Multi Objective Optimization for Injection Molding Using Numerical Simulation with Surrogate Models and Genetic Algorithms

Abstract The objective of this study is to develop an integrated computer-aided engineering (CAE) optimization system that can quickly and intelligently determine the optimal process conditions for injection molding. This study employs support vector regression (SVR) to establish the surrogate model based on executions of three-dimensional (3D) simulation for a selected dataset using the latin hypercube sampling (LHS) technique. Once the surrogate model can satisfactorily capture the characteristics of simulations with much less computing resources, a hybrid optimization genetic algorithm (GA) or a multi-objective optimization GA is then used to evaluate the surrogate model to search the global optimal solutions for the single or multiple objectives, respectively. The performance and capabilities of other surrogate modeling approaches, such as polynomial regression (PR) and artificial neural network (ANN), are also investigated in terms of accuracy, robustness, efficiency, and requirements for training samples. Experimental validations and applications of this work for process optimization of a special box mold and a precision optical lens are presented.

[1]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II , 2002, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[2]  Jack P. C. Kleijnen,et al.  State-of-the-Art Review: A User's Guide to the Brave New World of Designing Simulation Experiments , 2005, INFORMS J. Comput..

[3]  Jean-Francois Hetu,et al.  Three‐dimensional finite element solution of gas‐assisted injection moulding , 2002 .

[4]  Wen-Hsien Yang,et al.  Numerical simulation of mold filling in injection molding using a three‐dimensional finite volume approach , 2001 .

[5]  Roger E. Khayat,et al.  An adaptive boundary-element approach for 3D transient free surface cavity flow, as applied to polymer processing , 2001 .

[6]  Zhongbao Chen,et al.  Quantitative Study of Shrinkage and Warpage Behavior for Microcellular and Conventional Injection Molding , 2005 .

[7]  Y.-M. Deng,et al.  Optimization of injection moulding conditions with user-definable objective functions based on a genetic algorithm , 2004 .

[8]  Zbigniew Michalewicz,et al.  Genetic Algorithms + Data Structures = Evolution Programs , 1996, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[9]  Seong Jin Park,et al.  Optimal cooling system design for the injection molding process , 1998 .

[10]  Z. P. Wu,et al.  A novel hybrid genetic algorithm using local optimizer based on heuristic pattern move , 2001, Appl. Artif. Intell..

[11]  Lih-Sheng Turng,et al.  Developments of three-dimensional computer-aided engineering simulation for injection moulding , 2004 .

[12]  Vladimir Vapnik,et al.  Statistical learning theory , 1998 .

[13]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  A tutorial on support vector regression , 2004, Stat. Comput..

[14]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning , 1988 .

[15]  C. L. Tucker,et al.  Fundamentals of Computer Modeling for Polymer Processing , 1989 .

[16]  John H. Holland,et al.  Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence , 1992 .

[17]  Carlos E. Castro,et al.  Simultaneous Optimization of Mold Design and Processing Conditions in Injection Molding , 2005 .