Interference resolution: Insights from a meta-analysis of neuroimaging tasks

A quantitative meta-analysis was performed on 47 neuroimaging studies involving tasks purported to require the resolution of interference. The tasks included the Stroop, flanker, go/no-go, stimulus-response compatibility, Simon, and stop signal tasks. Peak density-based analyses of these combined tasks reveal that the anterior cingulate cortex, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, inferior frontal gyrus, posterior parietal cortex, and anterior insula may be important sites for the detection and/or resolution of interference. Individual task analyses reveal differential patterns of activation among the tasks. We propose that the drawing of distinctions among the processing stages at which interference may be resolved may explain regional activation differences. Our analyses suggest that resolution processes acting upon stimulus encoding, response selection, and response execution may recruit different neural regions.

[1]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task , 1974 .

[2]  J. Talairach,et al.  Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain: 3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging , 1988 .

[3]  A. Osman,et al.  Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility--a model and taxonomy. , 1990, Psychological review.

[4]  M. Raichle,et al.  The anterior cingulate cortex mediates processing selection in the Stroop attentional conflict paradigm. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  Colin M. Macleod.  Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review. , 1991, Psychological bulletin.

[6]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Role of the human anterior cingulate cortex in the control of oculomotor, manual, and speech responses: a positron emission tomography study. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Investigations of the functional anatomy of attention using the stroop test , 1993, Neuropsychologia.

[8]  Sylvan Kornblum,et al.  Changes in medial cortical blood flow with a stimulus-response compatibility task , 1994, Neuropsychologia.

[9]  David L. Strayer,et al.  Aging and inhibition: beyond a unitary view of inhibitory processing in attention. , 1994, Psychology and aging.

[10]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Interference and Facilitation Effects during Selective Attention: An H2 15O PET Study of Stroop Task Performance , 1995, NeuroImage.

[11]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  Brain-behavior relationships: evidence from practice effects in spatial stimulus-response compatibility. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  S. Kornblum,et al.  Isolation of Specific Interference Processing in the Stroop Task: PET Activation Studies , 1997, NeuroImage.

[13]  M. Farah,et al.  Role of left inferior prefrontal cortex in retrieval of semantic knowledge: a reevaluation. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  Y. Miyashita,et al.  No‐go dominant brain activity in human inferior prefrontal cortex revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging , 1998, The European journal of neuroscience.

[15]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  Bimodal (auditory and visual) left frontoparietal circuitry for sensorimotor integration and sensorimotor learning. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[16]  J. Jonides,et al.  Inhibition in verbal working memory revealed by brain activation. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  B. Vogt,et al.  Pain and Stroop interference tasks activate separate processing modules in anterior cingulate cortex , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[18]  Cynthia P. May,et al.  Inhibitory control, circadian arousal, and age. , 1999 .

[19]  S. Kornblum,et al.  A Parallel Distributed Processing Model of Stimulus–Stimulus and Stimulus–Response Compatibility , 1999, Cognitive Psychology.

[20]  A. Schnitzler,et al.  Magnetic stimulation of the dorsal premotor cortex modulates the Simon effect. , 1999, Neuroreport.

[21]  J. Requin,et al.  The Effects of Irrelevant Stimuli: 1. The Time Course of Stimulus-Stimulus and Stimulus-Response Consistency Effects With Stroop-Like Stimuli, Simon-Like Tasks, and Their Factorial Combinations , 1999 .

[22]  A. Miyake,et al.  Models of Working Memory: Mechanisms of Active Maintenance and Executive Control , 1999 .

[23]  R. Engle,et al.  Individual differences in working memory capacity and what they tell us about controlled attention, general fluid intelligence, and functions of the prefrontal cortex. , 1999 .

[24]  Y. Miyashita,et al.  Common inhibitory mechanism in human inferior prefrontal cortex revealed by event-related functional MRI. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[25]  A. Anderson,et al.  An fMRI study of stroop word-color interference: evidence for cingulate subregions subserving multiple distributed attentional systems , 1999, Biological Psychiatry.

[26]  E. Stein,et al.  Right hemispheric dominance of inhibitory control: an event-related functional MRI study. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  P. Skudlarski,et al.  An event-related functional MRI study of the stroop color word interference task. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[28]  J. Duncan,et al.  Common regions of the human frontal lobe recruited by diverse cognitive demands , 2000, Trends in Neurosciences.

[29]  C Andrew,et al.  Motor response suppression and the prepotent tendency to respond: a parametric fMRI study , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[30]  R. Cabeza,et al.  Imaging Cognition II: An Empirical Review of 275 PET and fMRI Studies , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[31]  J. Cohen,et al.  Dissociating the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortex in cognitive control. , 2000, Science.

[32]  K. Kiehl,et al.  Error processing and the rostral anterior cingulate: an event-related fMRI study. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[33]  Arthur F. Kramer,et al.  fMRI Studies of Stroop Tasks Reveal Unique Roles of Anterior and Posterior Brain Systems in Attentional Selection , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[34]  R. Poldrack,et al.  Neural Activation During Response Competition , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[35]  N. Cohen,et al.  The relative involvement of anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortex in attentional control depends on nature of conflict. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[36]  M. Botvinick,et al.  Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. , 2001, Psychological review.

[37]  J. Ashe,et al.  The Effect of Stimulus–Response Compatibility on Cortical Motor Activation , 2001, NeuroImage.

[38]  C. Frith,et al.  The Role of Working Memory in Visual Selective Attention , 2001, Science.

[39]  J. Ridley.  Studies of Interference in Serial Verbal Reactions , 2001 .

[40]  D. V. Cramon,et al.  Subprocesses of Performance Monitoring: A Dissociation of Error Processing and Response Competition Revealed by Event-Related fMRI and ERPs , 2001, NeuroImage.

[41]  E. Bullmore,et al.  Mapping Motor Inhibition: Conjunctive Brain Activations across Different Versions of Go/No-Go and Stop Tasks , 2001, NeuroImage.

[42]  Andrew R. A. Conway,et al.  A controlled-attention view of working-memory capacity. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[43]  K. Kiehl,et al.  Event‐related fMRI study of response inhibition , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[44]  G Gratton,et al.  Visual spatial localization conflict: an fMRI study , 2001, Neuroreport.

[45]  G. Glover,et al.  Error‐related brain activation during a Go/NoGo response inhibition task , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[46]  A F Kramer,et al.  Attentional selection and the processing of task-irrelevant information: insights from fMRI examinations of the Stroop task. , 2001, Progress in brain research.

[47]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Anterior Cingulate Cortex, Conflict Monitoring, and Levels of Processing , 2001, NeuroImage.

[48]  T. Woodward,et al.  The Role of the Anterior Cingulate Cortex in Conflict Processing: Evidence from Reverse Stroop Interference , 2001, NeuroImage.

[49]  G. Lohmann,et al.  Color-Word Matching Stroop Task: Separating Interference and Response Conflict , 2001, NeuroImage.

[50]  K. Kunz,et al.  Dissociating Striatal and Hippocampal Function Developmentally with a Stimulus–Response Compatibility Task , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[51]  Yihong Yang,et al.  A neural basis for the development of inhibitory control , 2002 .

[52]  P. Rabbitt,et al.  Individual inconsistency across measures of inhibition: an investigation of the construct validity of inhibition in older adults , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[53]  Kazunori Sato,et al.  The Human Prefrontal and Parietal Association Cortices Are Involved in NO-GO Performances: An Event-Related fMRI Study , 2002, NeuroImage.

[54]  Gary H. Glover,et al.  A Developmental fMRI Study of the Stroop Color-Word Task , 2002, NeuroImage.

[55]  K. Luan Phan,et al.  Functional Neuroanatomy of Emotion: A Meta-Analysis of Emotion Activation Studies in PET and fMRI , 2002, NeuroImage.

[56]  V. Menon,et al.  Maturation of brain function associated with response inhibition. , 2002, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.

[57]  Guinevere F. Eden,et al.  Meta-Analysis of the Functional Neuroanatomy of Single-Word Reading: Method and Validation , 2002, NeuroImage.

[58]  Eliot Hazeltine,et al.  Dissociable Contributions of Prefrontal and Parietal Cortices to Response Selection , 2002, NeuroImage.

[59]  Albert Gjedde,et al.  Putative Tests of Frontal Lobe Function: A PET-Study of Brain Activation During Stroop's Test and Verbal Fluency , 2002, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[60]  B. J. Casey,et al.  The Effect of Preceding Context on Inhibition: An Event-Related fMRI Study , 2002, NeuroImage.

[61]  H. Garavan,et al.  Dissociable Executive Functions in the Dynamic Control of Behavior: Inhibition, Error Detection, and Correction , 2002, NeuroImage.

[62]  N. Cohen,et al.  Attentional Control in the Aging Brain: Insights from an fMRI Study of the Stroop Task , 2002, Brain and Cognition.

[63]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  Neural implementation of response selection in humans as revealed by localized effects of stimulus–response compatibility on brain activation , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[64]  John C Gore,et al.  An event-related functional MRI study comparing interference effects in the Simon and Stroop tasks. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[65]  T. Robbins,et al.  Stop-signal inhibition disrupted by damage to right inferior frontal gyrus in humans , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[66]  Michael D. Dodd,et al.  In Opposition to Inhibition , 2003 .

[67]  Jin Fan,et al.  Cognitive and Brain Consequences of Conflict , 2003, NeuroImage.

[68]  K. Luan Phan,et al.  Valence, gender, and lateralization of functional brain anatomy in emotion: a meta-analysis of findings from neuroimaging , 2003, NeuroImage.

[69]  John Jonides,et al.  Dissociable neural mechanisms underlying response-based and familiarity-based conflict in working memory , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[70]  R. Engle,et al.  Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: the contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[71]  M. Milham,et al.  Competition for priority in processing increases prefrontal cortex's involvement in top-down control: an event-related fMRI study of the stroop task. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[72]  M. Reiff,et al.  Maturation of brain function associated with response inhibition. , 2003 .

[73]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Prefrontal cortex dysfunction mediates deficits in working memory and prepotent responding in schizophrenia , 2003, Biological Psychiatry.

[74]  Katya Rubia,et al.  Right inferior prefrontal cortex mediates response inhibition while mesial prefrontal cortex is responsible for error detection , 2003, NeuroImage.

[75]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Switching attention and resolving interference: fMRI measures of executive functions , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[76]  T. Robbins,et al.  Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[77]  Kevin Murphy,et al.  Beyond common resources: the cortical basis for resolving task interference , 2004, NeuroImage.

[78]  Tor D Wager,et al.  Neuroimaging studies of shifting attention: a meta-analysis , 2004, NeuroImage.

[79]  Xun Liu,et al.  Common and distinct neural substrates of attentional control in an integrated Simon and spatial Stroop task as assessed by event-related fMRI , 2004, NeuroImage.

[80]  D. Munoz,et al.  Look away: the anti-saccade task and the voluntary control of eye movement , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[81]  Marvin M Chun,et al.  Concurrent working memory load can reduce distraction. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[82]  Tor D. Wager,et al.  Common and unique components of response inhibition revealed by fMRI , 2005, NeuroImage.

[83]  Kathryn M. McMillan,et al.  A comparison of label‐based review and ALE meta‐analysis in the Stroop task , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[84]  Angela R Laird,et al.  Coordinate‐based voxel‐wise meta‐analysis: Dividends of spatial normalization. Report of a virtual workshop , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[85]  M. Brass,et al.  The role of the inferior frontal junction area in cognitive control , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[86]  M. Milham,et al.  Anterior cingulate cortex: An fMRI analysis of conflict specificity and functional differentiation , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[87]  M. Brass,et al.  Involvement of the inferior frontal junction in cognitive control: Meta‐analyses of switching and Stroop studies , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[88]  M. Banich,et al.  Functional dissociation of attentional selection within PFC: response and non-response related aspects of attentional selection as ascertained by fMRI. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[89]  J. Jonides,et al.  Brain mechanisms of proactive interference in working memory , 2006, Neuroscience.