Evaluation of the Second Generation of a Bioresorbable Everolimus Drug-Eluting Vascular Scaffold for Treatment of De Novo Coronary Artery StenosisClinical Perspective

Background— The first generation of the bioresorbable everolimus drug-eluting vascular scaffold showed signs of shrinkage at 6 months, which largely contributed to late luminal loss. Nevertheless, late luminal loss was less than that observed with bare metal stents. To maintain the mechanical integrity of the device up to 6 months, the scaffold design and manufacturing process of its polymer were modified. Methods and Results— Quantitative coronary angiography, intravascular ultrasound with analysis of radiofrequency backscattering, and as an optional assessment, optical coherence tomography (OCT) were performed at baseline and at a 6-month follow-up. Forty-five patients successfully received a single bioresorbable everolimus drug-eluting vascular scaffold. One patient had postprocedural release of myocardial enzyme without Q-wave occurrence; 1 patient with OCT-diagnosed disruption of the scaffold caused by excessive postdilatation was treated 1 month later with a metallic drug-eluting stent. At follow-up, 3 patients declined recatheterization, 42 patients had quantitative coronary angiography, 37 had quantitative intravascular ultrasound, and 25 had OCT. Quantitative coronary angiography disclosed 1 edge restenosis (1 of 42; in-segment binary restenosis, 2.4%). At variance with the ultrasonic changes seen with the first generation of bioresorbable everolimus drug-eluting vascular scaffold at 6 months, the backscattering of the polymeric struts did not decrease over time, the scaffold area was reduced by only 2.0% with intravascular ultrasound, and no change was noted with OCT. On an intention-to-treat basis, the late lumen loss amounted to 0.19±0.18 mm with a limited relative decrease in minimal luminal area of 5.4% on intravascular ultrasound. OCT showed at follow-up that 96.8% of the struts were covered and that malapposition of at least 1 strut, initially observed in 12 scaffolds, was detected at follow-up in only 3 scaffolds. Mean neointimal growth measured by OCT between and on top of the polymeric struts equaled 1.25 mm2, or 16.6% of the scaffold area. Conclusion— Modified manufacturing process of the polymer and geometric changes in the polymeric platform have substantially improved the medium-term performance of this new generation of drug-eluting scaffold to become comparable to those of current drug eluting stents. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: . Unique identifier: [NCT00856856][1]. # Clinical Perspective {#article-title-37} [1]: /lookup/external-ref?link_type=CLINTRIALGOV&access_num=NCT00856856&atom=%2Fcirculationaha%2F122%2F22%2F2301.atom

[1]  J. Alpert,et al.  The universal definition of myocardial infarction , 2021, The ESC Textbook of Intensive and Acute Cardiovascular Care.

[2]  P. Serruys,et al.  Three-year results of clinical follow-up after a bioresorbable everolimus-eluting scaffold in patients with de novo coronary artery disease: the ABSORB trial. , 2010, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[3]  Joanna J Wykrzykowska,et al.  3-Dimensional optical coherence tomography assessment of jailed side branches by bioresorbable vascular scaffolds: a proposal for classification. , 2010, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[4]  Patrick W Serruys,et al.  Monitoring in vivo absorption of a drug-eluting bioabsorbable stent with intravascular ultrasound-derived parameters a feasibility study. , 2010, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[5]  Yoshinobu Onuma,et al.  In vivo evaluation of stent strut distribution patterns in the bioabsorbable everolimus-eluting device: An OCT ad hoc analysis of the revision 1.0 and revision 1.1 stent design in the ABSORB clinical trial , 2010 .

[6]  Eloisa Arbustini,et al.  Expert review document on methodology, terminology, and clinical applications of optical coherence tomography: physical principles, methodology of image acquisition, and clinical application for assessment of coronary arteries and atherosclerosis. , 2010, European heart journal.

[7]  Evelyn Regar,et al.  Fully automatic three‐dimensional quantitative analysis of intracoronary optical coherence tomography , 2009, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[8]  E Regar,et al.  Optical coherence tomography assessment of the acute effects of stent implantation on the vessel wall: a systematic quantitative approach , 2009, Heart.

[9]  John A Ormiston,et al.  Bioabsorbable coronary stents. , 2009, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.

[10]  Patrick W. Serruys,et al.  Comparación cuantitativa ex vivo e in vivo de las dimensiones del lumen medidas por tomografía de coherencia óptica y ecografía intravascular en arterias coronarias humanas , 2009 .

[11]  P. Serruys,et al.  Quantitative ex vivo and in vivo comparison of lumen dimensions measured by optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound in human coronary arteries. , 2009, Revista espanola de cardiologia.

[12]  M. Mack,et al.  Assessment of the SYNTAX score in the Syntax study. , 2009, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[13]  Raimund Erbel,et al.  Early- and long-term intravascular ultrasound and angiographic findings after bioabsorbable magnesium stent implantation in human coronary arteries. , 2009, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[14]  Patrick W Serruys,et al.  A bioabsorbable everolimus-eluting coronary stent system (ABSORB): 2-year outcomes and results from multiple imaging methods , 2009, The Lancet.

[15]  David Rotger,et al.  Late stent recoil of the bioabsorbable everolimus-eluting coronary stent and its relationship with plaque morphology. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[16]  Patrick W Serruys,et al.  A bioabsorbable everolimus-eluting coronary stent system for patients with single de-novo coronary artery lesions (ABSORB): a prospective open-label trial , 2008, The Lancet.

[17]  J. Tanigawa,et al.  Coronary bioabsorbable magnesium stent: 15-month intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography findings. , 2007, European heart journal.

[18]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Usefulness of 64-slice multislice computed tomography coronary angiography to assess in-stent restenosis. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[19]  Raimund Erbel,et al.  Temporary scaffolding of coronary arteries with bioabsorbable magnesium stents: a prospective, non-randomised multicentre trial , 2007, The Lancet.

[20]  R. Virmani,et al.  Pathological Correlates of Late Drug-Eluting Stent Thrombosis: Strut Coverage as a Marker of Endothelialization , 2007, Circulation.

[21]  P. Serruys,et al.  Clinical End Points in Coronary Stent Trials: A Case for Standardized Definitions , 2007, Circulation.

[22]  D. Vince,et al.  Automated coronary plaque characterisation with intravascular ultrasound backscatter: ex vivo validation. , 2007, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[23]  P. Serruys,et al.  Optical Coherence Tomography in Cardiovascular Research , 2007 .

[24]  John A Ormiston,et al.  First‐in‐human implantation of a fully bioabsorbable drug‐eluting stent: The BVS poly‐L‐lactic acid everolimus‐eluting coronary stent , 2007, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[25]  Michael Joner,et al.  Pathology of drug-eluting stents in humans: delayed healing and late thrombotic risk. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[26]  Patrick W Serruys,et al.  The SYNergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with TAXus and cardiac surgery (SYNTAX) study: design, rationale, and run-in phase. , 2006, American heart journal.

[27]  Lippincott Williams Wilkins,et al.  ACC/AHA/SCAI Practice Guidelines, February 21, 2006 , 2006 .

[28]  Ron Waksman,et al.  Biodegradable stents: they do their job and disappear. , 2006, The Journal of invasive cardiology.

[29]  P. Hunold,et al.  Images in cardiovascular medicine. Novel magnetic resonance-compatible coronary stent: the absorbable magnesium-alloy stent. , 2005, Circulation.

[30]  O. Hess,et al.  Sirolimus-eluting stents associated with paradoxic coronary vasoconstriction. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[31]  E. Tuzcu,et al.  Coronary Plaque Classification With Intravascular Ultrasound Radiofrequency Data Analysis , 2002, Circulation.

[32]  C. Tracy,et al.  American College of Cardiology Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Standards for Acquisition, Measurement and Reporting of Intravascular Ultrasound Studies (IVUS). A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[33]  M. Leon,et al.  Patterns and mechanisms of in-stent restenosis. A serial intravascular ultrasound study. , 1996, Circulation.

[34]  H. Tunstall-Pedoe,et al.  Myocardial Infarction and Coronary Deaths in the World Health Organization MONICA Project: Registration Procedures, Event Rates, and Case‐Fatality Rates in 38 Populations From 21 Countries in Four Continents , 1994, Circulation.

[35]  P. Serruys,et al.  Assessment of the absorption process following bioabsorbable everolimus-eluting stent implantation: temporal changes in strain values and tissue composition using intravascular ultrasound radiofrequency data analysis. A substudy of the ABSORB clinical trial. , 2009, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[36]  Fred S Apple,et al.  Universal definition of myocardial infarction. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[37]  P. Serruys,et al.  Comparison of in vivo acute stent recoil between the bioabsorbable everolimus‐eluting coronary stent and the everolimus‐eluting cobalt chromium coronary stent: Insights from the ABSORB and SPIRIT trials , 2022 .