The influence of surface and speed on biomechanical external loads obtained from wearable devices in rearfoot strike runners.

External load variables such as peak tibial acceleration (PTA), peak vertical ground reaction forces (GRF) and its instantaneous vertical loading rate (IVLR) may contribute to running injuries although evidence is conflicting given the influence of training load and tissue health on injuries. These variables are influenced by footwear, speed, surface and foot strike pattern during running. The purpose of this study was to assess the influence of four surfaces and two running speeds on external load variables in rearfoot strike (RFS) runners. Twelve RFS runners (confirmed with sagittal foot contact angle) completed a 2-min running bout on a treadmill and 50-m running bouts over the three surfaces (pavement, rubber track and grass) in standardised shoes at their preferred speed and 20% faster. PTA and vertical GRFs were collected using inertial measurement units and in-shoe force insoles. No interaction or surface effects were observed (p > 0.017). The faster speed produced greater axial PTA (+19.2%; p < 0.001), resultant PTA (+20.7%; p < 0.001), peak vertical GRF (+6.6%; p = 0.002) and IVLR (+16.5%; p < 0.001). These findings suggest that surface type does not influence PTA, peak vertical GRF and IVLR but that running faster increases the magnitude of these external loads regardless of surface type in RFS runners.

[1]  F. Impellizzeri,et al.  A conceptual model and detailed framework for stress-related, strain-related, and overuse athletic injury. , 2019, Journal of science and medicine in sport.

[2]  Jacob E Resch,et al.  Running biomechanics as measured by wearable sensors: effects of speed and surface , 2019, Sports biomechanics.

[3]  R. V. van Rijn,et al.  Injury incidence and risk factors: a cohort study of 706 8-km or 16-km recreational runners , 2019, BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine.

[4]  Karl E Zelik,et al.  Ground reaction force metrics are not strongly correlated with tibial bone load when running across speeds and slopes: Implications for science, sport and wearable tech , 2019, PloS one.

[5]  Robin M. Queen,et al.  The Reliability and Validity of the Loadsol® under Various Walking and Running Conditions , 2019, Sensors.

[6]  C. Finch,et al.  A framework for the etiology of running‐related injuries , 2017, Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports.

[7]  Benedicte Vanwanseele,et al.  The effect of three surface conditions, speed and running experience on vertical acceleration of the tibia during running* , 2017, Sports biomechanics.

[8]  Scott C. Wearing,et al.  Why forefoot striking in minimal shoes might positively change the course of running injuries , 2017, Journal of sport and health science.

[9]  Clare E. Milner,et al.  Foot contact angle variability during a prolonged run with relation to injury history and habitual foot strike pattern , 2017, Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports.

[10]  D. Kuhman,et al.  Comparison of ankle kinematics and ground reaction forces between prospectively injured and uninjured collegiate cross country runners. , 2016, Human movement science.

[11]  Sicong Ren,et al.  Surface effects on in-shoe plantar pressure and tibial impact during running , 2015 .

[12]  D. Morrissey,et al.  The Biomechanical Differences Between Barefoot and Shod Distance Running: A Systematic Review and Preliminary Meta-Analysis , 2013, Sports Medicine.

[13]  Max R. Paquette,et al.  Acute effects of barefoot, minimal shoes and running shoes on lower limb mechanics in rear and forefoot strike runners , 2013 .

[14]  I. Sacco,et al.  Attenuation of foot pressure during running on four different surfaces: asphalt, concrete, rubber, and natural grass , 2012, Journal of sports sciences.

[15]  Irene S Davis,et al.  A kinematic method for footstrike pattern detection in barefoot and shod runners. , 2012, Gait & posture.

[16]  I. Davis,et al.  Foot strike patterns and collision forces in habitually barefoot versus shod runners , 2010, Nature.

[17]  E. Ward,et al.  The use of external transducers for estimating bone strain at the distal tibia during impact activity. , 2009, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[18]  Clare E. Milner,et al.  Biomechanical factors associated with tibial stress fracture in female runners. , 2006, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[19]  M E Batt,et al.  Surface effects on ground reaction forces and lower extremity kinematics in running. , 2000, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[20]  S. Hasan,et al.  Relationship between vertical ground reaction force and speed during walking, slow jogging, and running. , 1996, Clinical biomechanics.

[21]  Ewald M. Hennig,et al.  Relationships between Ground Reaction Force and Tibial Bone Acceleration Parameters , 1991 .

[22]  D. Lloyd-Smith,et al.  Stress fractures in athletes , 1987 .

[23]  Kelly R Sheerin,et al.  The measurement of tibial acceleration in runners-A review of the factors that can affect tibial acceleration during running and evidence-based guidelines for its use. , 2019, Gait & posture.

[24]  Kristin L. Popp,et al.  Bone strength estimates relative to vertical ground reaction force discriminates women runners with stress fracture history. , 2017, Bone.

[25]  A. A. Zadpoor,et al.  The relationship between lower-extremity stress fractures and the ground reaction force: a systematic review. , 2011, Clinical biomechanics.

[26]  Clare E. Milner,et al.  Biomechanical predictors of retrospective tibial stress fractures in runners. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[27]  Joseph Hamill,et al.  Kinetic asymmetry in female runners with and without retrospective tibial stress fractures , 2006 .

[28]  B M Nigg,et al.  The influence of running velocity and midsole hardness on external impact forces in heel-toe running. , 1987, Journal of biomechanics.