Supporting Communication in a Collaborative Discovery Learning Environment: the Effect of Instruction

We present a study on the effect of instruction on collaboration in a collaborative discovery learning environment. The instruction we used, called RIDE, is built upon four principles identified in the literature on collaborative processes: Respect, Intelligent collaboration, Deciding together, and Encouraging. In an experimental study, a group of learners (ages 15–17) receiving this instruction was compared to a control group. The learners worked in dyads on separate computers in a shared discovery learning environment in the physics domain of collisions, communicating through a chat channel. Qualitative and quantitative analyses of the logged actions in the learning environment and the chat protocols showed that the RIDE instruction can lead to more constructive communication, and improved discovery learning activities, as expected, although no direct effect on discovery learning results was found. This study shows the benefits of providing instruction on effective communication and the learning process in a collaborative discovery learning situation.

[1]  T. Jong,et al.  Exploratory learning with a computer simulation for control theory: learning processes and instructional support , 1993 .

[2]  B. Hout-Wolters,et al.  Social and cognitive strategies in co-operative groups: effects of strategy instruction in secondary mathematics. , 1994 .

[3]  RUPERT WEGERIF,et al.  Using computers to help coach exploratory talk across the curriculum , 1996, Comput. Educ..

[4]  R. Ploetzner,et al.  Learning by explaining to oneself and to others. , 1999 .

[5]  Barbara Wasson,et al.  Identifying Coordination Agents for Collaborative Telelearning , 1998 .

[6]  G. Salomon,et al.  When teams do not function the way they ought to , 1989 .

[7]  Michael J. Baker,et al.  Promoting reflective interactions in a CSCL environment , 1997, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[8]  Michelene T. H. Chi,et al.  Self-Explanations: How Students Study and Use Examples in Learning To Solve Problems. Technical Report No. 9. , 1987 .

[9]  N. Mercer,et al.  Scaffolding the development of effective collaboration and learning , 2003 .

[10]  A. King.  ASK to THINK-TEL WHY: A model of transactive peer tutoring for scaffolding higher level complex learning , 1997 .

[11]  J. V. Linden,et al.  Leren in dialoog : een discussie over samenwerkend leren in onderwijs en opleiding , 2000 .

[12]  Tom Murray,et al.  Authoring tools for advanced technology learning environments : toward cost-effective adaptive, interactive and intelligent educational software , 2003 .

[13]  Sandra P. Marshall,et al.  Schemas in Problem Solving , 1995 .

[14]  Rijkje Dekker,et al.  A Process Model for Interaction and Mathematical Level Raising , 1998 .

[15]  R. Kozma.  The Impact of Computer-Based Tools and Embedded Prompts on Writing Processes and Products of Novice and Advanced College Writers , 1991 .

[16]  Neil Mercer,et al.  Computers and Reasoning Through Talk in the Classroom , 1996 .

[17]  S. Burge,et al.  Periungual and subungual arteriovenous tumours , 1986, The British journal of dermatology.

[18]  Cher Hendricks,et al.  Teaching Causal Reasoning Through Cognitive Apprenticeship: What Are Results From Situated Learning? , 2001 .

[19]  T. Kadono,et al.  Acquired digital arteriovenous malformation: a report of six cases , 2000, The British journal of dermatology.

[20]  Ton de Jong,et al.  Promoting Self-Directed Learning in Simulation-Based Discovery Learning Environments Through Intelligent Support , 2000, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[21]  Susanne P. Lajoie,et al.  Computers As Cognitive Tools , 2020 .

[22]  B. Creemers,et al.  The Effects of Teacher Training on New Instructional Behaviour in Reading Comprehension. , 2002 .

[23]  Michael J. Baker,et al.  The role of grounding in collaborative learning tasks , 1999 .

[24]  Pierre Dillenbourg,et al.  What is 'multi' in multi-agent learning? , 1999 .

[25]  Pierre Dillenbourg,et al.  Collaborative Learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches , 1999 .

[26]  Jerry Andriessen,et al.  Learning through synchronous electronic discussion , 2000, Comput. Educ..

[27]  John A. Ross,et al.  Impact of Explanation Seeking on Student Achievement and Attitudes , 1995 .

[28]  B. Everitt,et al.  Statistical methods for rates and proportions , 1973 .

[29]  Neil Mercer,et al.  Using Computer-based Text Analysis to Integrate Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Research on Collaborative Learning , 1997 .

[30]  N. Mercer.  The quality of talk in children’s collaborative activity in the classroom , 1996, Language and the Joint Creation of Knowledge.

[31]  Ard W. Lazonder,et al.  Using sentence openers to foster student interaction in computer-mediated learning environments , 2003, Comput. Educ..

[32]  Students' knowledge construction in small groups in the seventh grade biology laboratory: Verbal communication and physical engagement , 1999 .

[33]  Mike Sharples,et al.  A theory-informed framework for designing software to support reasoning about causation in history , 2002, Comput. Educ..

[34]  R. Dawber,et al.  Digital arteriovenous malformation , 2000, British Journal of Dermatology.

[35]  N. Mercer,et al.  From social interaction to individual reasoning: an empirical investigation of a possible socio-cultural model of cognitive development , 1999 .

[36]  N. Webb,et al.  Promoting Helping Behavior in Cooperative Small Groups in Middle School Mathematics , 1994 .

[37]  CHRISTINE HOWE,et al.  Computer support for learning in collaborative contexts: prompted hypothesis testing in physics , 1998, Comput. Educ..

[38]  Wouter van Joolingen,et al.  Cognitive tools for discovery learning , 1999 .

[39]  O. Enjolras.  Classification and Management of the Various Superficial Vascular Anomalies: Hemangiomas and Vascular Malformations , 1997, The Journal of dermatology.

[40]  E. Paice,et al.  Collaborative learning , 2003, Medical education.

[41]  Jonathan A. Rhoades,et al.  Interaction process in computer-mediated and face-to-face groups , 1995, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[42]  W. R. van Joolingen,et al.  SimQuest: authoring educational simulations. , 2003 .

[43]  Leonard Springer,et al.  Effects of Small-Group Learning on Undergraduates in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology: A Meta-Analysis , 1997 .

[44]  Carol K. K. Chan,et al.  Knowledge Building as a Mediator of Conflict in Conceptual Change , 1997 .

[45]  P. Kutnick,et al.  Toward a social pedagogy of classroom group work , 2003 .

[46]  Nadira Saab,et al.  Communication in collaborative discovery learning. , 2005, The British journal of educational psychology.

[47]  C. Yang,et al.  Acquired digital arteriovenous malformation: a report of three cases and study with epiluminescence microscopy , 2002, The British journal of dermatology.

[48]  Monique Pijls,et al.  Mathematical Level Raising Through Collaborative Investigations with the Computer , 2003, Int. J. Comput. Math. Learn..

[49]  Penelope L. Peterson,et al.  The Relationship of Student Ability and Small-Group Interaction to Student Achievement , 1982 .

[50]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  Collaborative Discovery in a Scientific Domain , 1997, Cogn. Sci..

[51]  H. Cowie.  Social Interaction in Learning and Instruction , 2000 .

[52]  Carol K. K. Chan.  Peer collaboration and discourse patterns in learning from incompatible information , 2001 .