Review and assessment of the nested logit model

The popular hierarchical or nested logit model that has been the recent source of heated discussions in the literature is reviewed and critically examined. The fundamental underpinnings of the model are first presented in a concise and easy-to-understand fashion and then used to assess each controversy in turn. Monte Carlo simulation is also used to examine some problems that are not possible to address by just resorting to the theory. The main conclusion is that all the model hypotheses are both essential and unambiguous and should not be ignored for a correct use of the model in practice.

[1]  G Hyman,et al.  THE NESTED INCREMENTAL LOGIT MODEL: THEORY AND APPLICATION TO MODAL CHOICE --TRANSPORTATION PLANNING METHODS. PROCEEDINGS OF SEMINAR C HELD AT THE PTRC SUMMER ANNUAL MEETING, BATH UNIVERSITY ENGLAND, 7-11 SEPTEMBER 1987, VOLUME P290 , 1987 .

[2]  J. de D. Ortúzar,et al.  Fundamentals of discrete multimodal choice modelling , 1982 .

[3]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  A comparison of elasticities derived from multinomial logit, nested logit and heteroscedastic extreme value SP-RP discrete choice models , 1998 .

[4]  Frank S. Koppelman,et al.  Alternative nested logit models: a response to comments by Andrew Daly on an earlier paper of Frank Koppelman and Chieh-hua Wen , 2001 .

[5]  W. R. Buckland,et al.  Distributions in Statistics: Continuous Multivariate Distributions , 1973 .

[6]  Juan de Dios Ortúzar,et al.  Representation of heteroskedasticity in discrete choice models , 2000 .

[7]  Juan de Dios Ortúzar,et al.  VALUE OF TIME SENSITIVITY TO MODEL SPECIFICATION , 1989 .

[8]  Daniel McFadden,et al.  Modelling the Choice of Residential Location , 1977 .

[9]  M. Ben-Akiva,et al.  The demand for local telephone service: a fully discrete model of residential calling patterns and service choices , 1987 .

[10]  Gary L. Hunt,et al.  Alternative Nested Logit Model Structures and the Special Case of Partial Degeneracy , 2000 .

[11]  J. de D. Ortúzar,et al.  TRAVEL DEMAND AND RESPONSE ANALYSIS - SOME INTEGRATING THEMES , 1982 .

[12]  F. Koppelman,et al.  Alternative nested logit models: structure, properties and estimation , 1998 .

[13]  Catherine L. Kling,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of the Consistency of Nested Logit Models with Utility Maximization , 1995 .

[14]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  STRUCTURE OF PASSENGER TRAVEL DEMAND MODELS , 1974 .

[15]  Juan de Dios Ortúzar,et al.  MODAL CHOICE MODELLING FOR SEVERAL ALTERNATIVES : APPLICATION OF DISAGGREGATE DEMAND MODELS IN SANTIAGO, CHILE , 1985 .

[16]  Alan Wilson,et al.  Calibration and testing of the SELNEC transport model , 1969 .

[17]  Juan de Dios Ortúzar.  On the development of the nested logit model , 2001 .

[18]  H Timmennans,et al.  On the Formation of Travel Demand Models and Economic Evalqation Measures of User Benefit. Environment and Planning, a 9: 285-34 Wilson a G 1971 a Family of Spatial Interaction Models and Associated Developments. Environment and Planning, a 3: 1-32 , 2022 .

[19]  Alan Wilson.  Urban and regional models in geography and planning , 1974 .

[20]  Frank S. Koppelman,et al.  Nested Logit Models Which Are You Using? , 1998 .

[21]  C. Kling,et al.  The Implications of Model Specification for Welfare Estimation in Nested Logit Models , 1996 .

[22]  H. Williams.  On the Formation of Travel Demand Models and Economic Evaluation Measures of User Benefit , 1977 .

[23]  Andrew Daly,et al.  Alternative tree logit models: comments on a paper of Koppelman and Wen , 2001 .

[24]  D. McFadden,et al.  URBAN TRAVEL DEMAND - A BEHAVIORAL ANALYSIS , 1977 .

[25]  D. McFadden.  Econometric Models of Probabilistic Choice , 1981 .

[26]  C. Bhat.  A heteroscedastic extreme value model of intercity travel mode choice , 1995 .

[27]  K. Train.  Recreation Demand Models with Taste Differences Over People , 1998 .

[28]  A. Börsch-Supan.  On the compatibility of nested logit models with utility maximization , 1990 .

[29]  Michel Bierlaire,et al.  On The Overspecification of Multinomial and Nested Logit Models Due to Alternative Specific Constants , 1997, Transp. Sci..

[30]  David A. Hensher,et al.  The Mixed Logit Model: the State of Practice and Warnings for the Unwary , 2001 .

[31]  David A. Hensher.  Understanding travel behaviour: some appealing research directions , 1998 .

[32]  Axel Börsch-Supan,et al.  Recent Developments in Flexible Discrete Choice Models: Nested Logit Analysis Versus Simulated Moments Probit Analysis , 1990 .

[33]  Andrew Daly,et al.  Estimating “tree” logit models , 1987 .

[34]  Marcela Munizaga,et al.  NESTED LOGIT MODELLING: SOME HARD FACTS , 1999 .

[35]  David A. Hensher,et al.  SPECIFICATION AND ESTIMATION OF NESTED LOGIT MODELS , 1999 .

[36]  David A. Hensher,et al.  HEV Choice Models as a Search Engine for the Specification of Nested Logit Tree Structures , 1999 .

[37]  H. Williams,et al.  Behavioural theories of dispersion and the mis-specification of travel demand models☆ , 1982 .

[38]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand , 1985 .

[39]  Catherine L. Kling,et al.  Testing The Consistency of Nested Logit Models with Utility Maximization , 1996 .

[40]  D. Hensher.  Sequential and Full Information Maximum Likelihood Estimation of a Nested Logit Model , 1986 .

[41]  Carlos F. Daganzo,et al.  Technical Note - Two Properties of the Nested Logit Model , 1993, Transp. Sci..

[42]  Marvin L Manheim.  PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS OF SOME FUNDAMENTAL PROPERTIES OF TRAVEL-DEMAND MODELS , 1973 .