Coronary artery stent evaluation by combining iterative reconstruction and high-resolution kernel at coronary CT angiography.

PURPOSE To evaluate stent lumen visualization by combining high-resolution cardiac kernel and the iterative reconstruction (iDose) on an anthropomorphic moving heart phantom and in patients at coronary computed tomography (CT) angiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS We used the moving heart phantom and a 64 detector-row CT, retrospectively gated helical scanning, and image reconstruction. The heart rate was set at nonpulsating condition of 0 beats/min, 50 beats/min, and 80 beats/min. The 120-kV images were reconstructed in synchronization with electrocardiogram data using filtered back projection (FBP) or iDose algorithm and standard kernel/filter (CB) or high-resolution kernel/filter (CD). We measured image noise, the kurtosis, and stent lumen diameter in the phantom study. We also assessed the visual inspections by two radiologists. RESULTS With cardiac motion at 50 and 80 beats/min, the difference of kurtosis improved with CD relative to CB (P < .05). iDose algorithm with level 7 provided lowest noise, with no statistically significance in difference of the kurtosis relative to level 4 (P > .05). Without cardiac motion at 0 beats/min, the stent lumen diameter measurements with CD kernel were better relative to CB kernel (P < .05). In addition, no significant difference was found in stent lumen diameter between iDose level 4 and level 7 (P > .05). CONCLUSION The use of iDose and a sharp kernel allowed improved stent visualization at a lower radiation dose.

[1]  Ernst J. Rummeny,et al.  A clinical comparison study of a novel statistical iterative and filtered backprojection reconstruction , 2011, Medical Imaging.

[2]  S. Furui,et al.  Assessment of Coronary Stents Using 40-Detector Row CT: Comparison With 16-Detector Row CT In Vitro , 2007, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[3]  Rüdiger Blindt,et al.  Coronary Artery Stents in Multislice Computed Tomography: In Vitro Artifact Evaluation , 2004, Investigative radiology.

[4]  Simon Wildermuth,et al.  Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology: first experience. , 2005 .

[5]  Xiangying Du,et al.  64-MDCT coronary angiography: phantom study of effects of vascular attenuation on detection of coronary stenosis. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[6]  W. B. Meijboom,et al.  Multidetector CT for visualization of coronary stents. , 2006, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[7]  C. Herzog,et al.  In vitro evaluation of metallic coronary artery stents with 64-MDCT using an ECG-gated cardiac phantom: relationship between in-stent visualization, stent type, and heart rate. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  Yun Shen,et al.  In vitro measurement of CT density and estimation of stenosis related to coronary soft plaque at 100 kV and 120 kV on ECG-triggered scan. , 2011, European journal of radiology.

[9]  A. Taştan,et al.  Evaluation of coronary stent patency and in-stent restenosis with dual-source CT coronary angiography without heart rate control. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  W. Heindel,et al.  64- Versus 16-Slice CT Angiography for Coronary Artery Stent Assessment: In Vitro Experience , 2006, Investigative radiology.

[11]  Zhonghua Sun,et al.  Multi-detector row CT angiography in the assessment of coronary in-stent restenosis: a systematic review. , 2009, European journal of radiology.

[12]  Gabriel P. Krestin,et al.  High-Resolution Spiral Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography in Patients Referred for Diagnostic Conventional Coronary Angiography , 2005, Circulation.

[13]  C. McCollough,et al.  CT dose reduction and dose management tools: overview of available options. , 2006, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[14]  D. Oncel,et al.  Coronary stent patency and in-stent restenosis: determination with 64-section multidetector CT coronary angiography--initial experience. , 2007, Radiology.

[15]  Rainer Raupach,et al.  64-slice multidetector coronary CT angiography: in vitro evaluation of 68 different stents , 2006, European Radiology.

[16]  Daniel T Boll,et al.  Coronary stent patency: dual-energy multidetector CT assessment in a pilot study with anthropomorphic phantom. , 2008, Radiology.

[17]  K. Bae,et al.  Coronary artery stent patency assessed with in-stent contrast enhancement measured at multi-detector row CT angiography: initial experience. , 2004, Radiology.

[18]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Evaluation of patients with previous coronary stent implantation with 64-section CT. , 2007, Radiology.

[19]  N. Paul,et al.  Perioperative β-Blockers : Use With Caution Perioperative β Blockers in Patients Having Non-Cardiac Surgery : A Meta-Analysis , 2010 .

[20]  J. Leipsic,et al.  Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction: assessment of image noise and image quality in coronary CT angiography. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[21]  Katsuyuki Taguchi,et al.  Combination of a Low-Tube-Voltage Technique With Hybrid Iterative Reconstruction (iDose) Algorithm at Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography , 2011, Journal of computer assisted tomography.