Degrees of Freedom in Behavior

Coordinated behavior is typically explained in terms of motor programs or coordinative structures. The experiments described in this report suggest that a better explanation may be provided by control theory. In all experiments, subjects controlled the two-dimensional position of a cursor. By varying the disturbances to the two degrees of freedom of cursor movement, it was possible to elicit task-specific, unidimensional movement patterns resembling coordinative structures. Perturbation of one dimension of the movement pattern failed to produce a concomitant response in the other dimension unless there was a link between the degrees of freedom of action and perception. The subjects' behavior was accurately simulated by the behavior of independent feedback control systems. The results show that the problem of coordinating many degrees of freedom of action can be solved by viewing behavior as control of the perceptual consequences of these actions.

[1]  J. Milsum,et al.  Living control systems , 1968 .

[2]  W. T. Powers.  Behavior, the control of perception , 1973 .

[3]  R. Schmidt.  A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. , 1975 .

[4]  M. T. Turvey,et al.  Issues in the theory of action : Degree of freedom, coordinative structures and coalitions , 1978 .

[5]  Stuart Bennett,et al.  A History of Control Engineering 1800-1930 , 1979 .

[6]  A. T. Fuller,et al.  A History of Control Engineering 1800-1930 , 1979 .

[7]  D Goodman,et al.  On the nature of human interlimb coordination. , 1979, Science.

[8]  J. Requin.  Attention and Performance VII , 1980 .

[9]  M. Turvey.  The bernstein perspective I , 1982 .

[10]  M. Gazzaniga.  Handbook of Cognitive Neuroscience , 1984, Springer US.

[11]  J. Kelso,et al.  A Dynamical Basis for Action Systems , 1984 .

[12]  H. Heuer,et al.  Motor behavior : programming, control, and acquisition , 1985 .

[13]  David A. Rosenbaum,et al.  Motor Programming: A Review and Scheduling Theory , 1985 .

[14]  Richard S Marken,et al.  Perceptual organization of behavior: a hierarchical control model of coordinated action. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  J. Kelso.  Pattern Formation in Speech and Limb Movements Involving Many Degrees of Freedom , 1986 .

[16]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1: foundations , 1986 .

[17]  R. Marken.  The nature of behavior: Control as fact and theory , 1988 .

[18]  W. Thomas Bourbon,et al.  Chapter 10 A Control-Theory Analysis of Interference During Social Tracking , 1989 .

[19]  Richard S. Marken,et al.  Spreadsheet analysis of a hierarchical control system model of behavior , 1990 .

[20]  H. L. Teulings.  Human movement control: Computation, representation, and implementation , 1990 .