Assessment of Change in Psychoanalysis

A systematic method is presented whereby material from a full course of psychoanalytic treatment is analyzed to assess changes and identify patterns of change. Through an analysis of session notes, changes were assessed using the CHange After Psychotherapy scales (CHAP; Sandell 1987a), which evaluate changes in five rating variables (symptoms, adaptive capacity, insight, basic conflicts, and extratherapeutic factors). Change incidents were identified in nearly every session. Early in the analysis, relatively more change incidents related to insight were found than were found for the other types of change. By contrast, in the third year and part of the fourth year, relatively more change incidents related to basic conflicts and adaptive capacity were found. While changes related to symptoms occurred throughout the course of treatment, such changes were never more frequent than other types of change. A content analysis of the change incidents allowed a determination of when in the treatment the patient’s main conflicts (identified clinically) were overcome. A crossing of quantitative data with clinical and qualitative data allowed a better understanding of the patterns of change.

[1]  R. Sandell Rating the outcomes of psychotherapy or psychoanalysis using the Change After Psychotherapy (CHAP) scales. Manual and commentary , 2015 .

[2]  E. Avdibegović,et al.  Insight in psychotherapy. , 2012, Psychiatria Danubina.

[3]  B. Grenyer,et al.  Psychodynamic change in psychotherapy: Cycles of patient–therapist linguistic interactions and interventions , 2011, Psychotherapy research : journal of the Society for Psychotherapy Research.

[4]  P. Høglend,et al.  The mediating role of insight for long-term improvements in psychodynamic therapy. , 2010, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[5]  Steffen Walter,et al.  The synchronization of plan activations and emotion-abstraction patterns in the psychotherapeutic process: A single-case study , 2010, Psychotherapy research : journal of the Society for Psychotherapy Research.

[6]  S. Ackerman,et al.  Personality and Symptom Change in Treatment-Refractory Inpatients: Evaluation of the Phase Model of Change Using Rorschach, TAT, and DSM-IV Axis V , 2004, Journal of personality assessment.

[7]  T. Grande,et al.  PROGRESSIVE CHANGES IN PATIENTS' LIVES AFTER PSYCHOTHERAPY: WHICH TREATMENT EFFECTS SUPPORT THEM? , 2003, Psychotherapy research : journal of the Society for Psychotherapy Research.

[8]  S. Llewelyn,et al.  Process research in understanding and applying psychological therapies. , 2001, The British journal of clinical psychology.

[9]  J. Ablon,et al.  Psychotherapy process in the National Institute of Mental Health Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program. , 1999, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[10]  G. Gabbard,et al.  Making the case for psychoanalytic therapies in the current psychiatric environment. , 1999, Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association.

[11]  S. Waldron How can we study the efficacy of psychoanalysis? , 1997, The Psychoanalytic quarterly.

[12]  E. Mergenthaler,et al.  Emotion-abstraction patterns in verbatim protocols: a new way of describing psychotherapeutic processes. , 1996, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[13]  W. Lutz,et al.  Evaluation of psychotherapy. Efficacy, effectiveness, and patient progress. , 1996, The American psychologist.

[14]  J. Berry,et al.  Changes in the patient's level of insight in brief psychotherapy: Two pilot studies. , 1994 .

[15]  G. Silberschatz,et al.  Measuring the therapist's impact on the patient's therapeutic progress. , 1993, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[16]  S. Pulos,et al.  Comparing the process in psychodynamic and cognitive-behavioral therapies. , 1993, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[17]  Z. Martinovich,et al.  A phase model of psychotherapy outcome: causal mediation of change. , 1993, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[18]  S. Pulos,et al.  How Therapy is Conducted in the Private Consulting Room: A Multidimensional Description of Brief Psychodynamic Treatments , 1992 .

[19]  RM Weinryb,et al.  Karolinska Psychodynamic Profile , 1991, Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica. Supplementum.

[20]  H. Sampson,et al.  Mount Zion Hospital and Medical Center: Research on the process of change in psychotherapy. , 1991 .

[21]  N. L. Drake THE PSYCHOANALYTIC PROCESS: THEORY, CLINICAL OBSERVATION, AND EMPIRICAL RESEARCH , 1988 .

[22]  R. Sandell Assessing the Effects of Psychotherapy , 1987 .

[23]  R. Sandell Assessing the effects of psychotherapy. III. Reliability and validity of 'change after psychotherapy'. , 1987, Psychotherapy and psychosomatics.

[24]  R. Sandell Assessing the effects of psychotherapy. II. A procedure for direct rating of therapeutic change. , 1987, Psychotherapy and psychosomatics.

[25]  H. Blum The curative and creative aspects of insight. , 1979, Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association.

[26]  F. Magnussen The psychotherapeutic process. , 1978, Psychotherapy and psychosomatics.

[27]  A. Paul,et al.  The Psychoanalytic Process A Case Illustration , 1972 .