Low-Grade Tubular-Mucinous Renal Neoplasms: Morphologic, Immunohistochemical, and Genetic Features

The current classification system of renal tumors is based on morphologic criteria, as supported by genetic findings. We present a group of previously unclassified tumors with similar morphologic and genetic features, suggesting a new entity within renal neoplasms. Seven renal tumors from five patients (ages 31–67 years) were analyzed. All cases were stained with periodic acid–Schiff, Hale’s colloidal iron (HCI), and Alcian blue (AB) at pH 2.5/1.0 with and without hyaluronidase (HA) digestion. Immunohistochemical (IHC) stains were performed for CK8, CK18, CK19, vimentin, villin, Tamm-Horsfall protein (THP), renal cell carcinoma marker (RCC), epithelial membrane antigen (EMA), ulex europaeus agglutinin (UEA-1), soy bean agglutinin (SBA), peanut agglutinin (PNA), and MIB-1. Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) and loss of heterozygosity (LOH) studies were performed on all cases. All tumors showed circumscribed growth, a tubular growth pattern with focal solid areas, no significant nuclear atypia and absence of necrosis, desmoplasia, or inflammation. Abundant extracellular mucin was present. Immunohistochemistry stains support collecting duct origin (EMA+, PNA+, SBA±, CK 8/18/19+, vimentin±, UEA-1−, RCC−, villin−, THP−). The proliferative rate was low (<1%). CGH showed multiple consistent chromosomal losses (−1,-4, −6, −8, −9, −13, −14, −15, −22). Clinical outcome was favorable, with recurrences but no known distant metastases or death of disease. These findings are distinct from all previously classified renal neoplasms. Our data suggest the presence of a unique tumor entity within tumors of probable collecting duct origin: tubular-mucinous renal tumors of low malignant potential.

[1]  G. Kovacs The value of molecular genetic analysis in the diagnosis and prognosis of renal cell tumours , 2004, World Journal of Urology.

[2]  E. Jones,et al.  Mapping a tumor suppressor gene to chromosome 2p13 in metanephric adenoma by microsatellite allelotyping. , 2001, Human pathology.

[3]  V. Reuter,et al.  Contemporary approach to the classification of renal epithelial tumors. , 2000, Seminars in oncology.

[4]  S. Braun,et al.  Polyploidization and losses of chromosomes 1, 2, 6, 10, 13, and 17 in three cases of chromophobe renal cell carcinomas. , 1999, Cancer genetics and cytogenetics.

[5]  G. Bartsch,et al.  Characterisation of a collecting duct carcinoma by cytogenetic analysis and comparative genomic hybridisation. , 1998, International journal of oncology.

[6]  J. Srigley,et al.  Collecting duct carcinoma of kidney. , 1998, Seminars in diagnostic pathology.

[7]  D. Grignon,et al.  Papillary and metanephric adenomas of the kidney. , 1998, Seminars in diagnostic pathology.

[8]  D. Bostwick,et al.  Low-grade collecting duct carcinoma of the kidney: report of 13 cases of low-grade mucinous tubulocystic renal carcinoma of possible collecting duct origin. , 1997, Urology.

[9]  A. Renshaw,et al.  Cytologic and cytogenetic analysis of metanephric adenoma of the kidney: a report of two cases. , 1997, American journal of clinical pathology.

[10]  Holger Moch,et al.  The Heidelberg classification of renal cell tumours , 1997, The Journal of pathology.

[11]  B. Delahunt,et al.  Classification of renal cell carcinoma , 1997, Cancer.

[12]  D. Bostwick,et al.  Simultaneous chromosome 7 and 17 gain and sex chromosome loss provide evidence that renal metanephric adenoma is related to papillary renal cell carcinoma. , 1997, The Journal of urology.

[13]  D. Sidransky,et al.  Molecular differential diagnosis of renal carcinoma: from microscopes to microsatellites. , 1996, The American journal of pathology.

[14]  D. Bostwick,et al.  Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of renal oncocytoma reveals frequent loss of chromosomes Y and 1. , 1996, The Journal of urology.

[15]  W. Böcker,et al.  Komparative genomische Hybridisierung in der Pathologie Eine neue molekularzytogenetische Methode* , 1996, Der Pathologe.

[16]  A. Llombart‐Bosch,et al.  Cytogenetic analysis of three primary Bellini duct carcinomas , 1996 .

[17]  Z. Gatalica,et al.  Metanephric adenoma: histology, immunophenotype, cytogenetics, ultrastructure. , 1996, Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc.

[18]  A. Llombart‐Bosch,et al.  Cytogenetic analysis of three primary Bellini duct carcinomas. , 1996, Genes, chromosomes & cancer.

[19]  F. Mostofi,et al.  Metanephric adenoma. Clinicopathological study of fifty patients. , 1995, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[20]  N. Konishi,et al.  Antigen immunohistochemistry of renal cell adenomas in autopsy cases: relevance to histogenesis. , 1995, Oncology.

[21]  J. Brooks,et al.  Frequent Loss of Chromosome Arms 8p and 13q in Collecting Duct Carcinoma (CDC) of the Kidney , 1995, Genes, chromosomes & cancer.

[22]  E. Schröck,et al.  Specific loss of chromosomes 1, 2, 6, 10, 13, 17, and 21 in chromophobe renal cell carcinomas revealed by comparative genomic hybridization. , 1994, The American journal of pathology.

[23]  M. Varma,et al.  Collecting duct carcinoma of the kidney. , 1993, British journal of urology.

[24]  L. Füzesi,et al.  Collecting duct carcinoma: cytogenetic characterization , 1992, Histopathology.

[25]  A. Imam,et al.  Monoclonal antibody to a proximal nephrogenic renal antigen: immunohistochemical analysis of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded human renal cell carcinomas. , 1989, Cancer research.

[26]  R. Horvat,et al.  Lectin histochemistry of kidney tumours and its pathomorphological relevance , 1985, Histopathology.